Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 StarCraft 2 vs Tiberium Wars

views
     
TSwilsonphua
post Aug 5 2010, 06:25 PM, updated 16y ago

Gear Up. Game On.
*******
Senior Member
2,152 posts

Joined: Nov 2008
Ok just vote....
sioe
post Aug 5 2010, 06:27 PM

~Brainnnnnnnnzzz~
****
Senior Member
619 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: KayEll to MyLucka to the 9th State


NO fight la.... SC II! No doubt!
Cheesenium
post Aug 5 2010, 06:28 PM

Vigilo Confido
*******
Senior Member
4,852 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
Do we really need this kind of thread?

The answer is obvious.
Quazacolt
post Aug 5 2010, 06:28 PM

Riding couple
*******
Senior Member
5,366 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
From: KL Malaysia


QUOTE(wilsonphua @ Aug 5 2010, 06:25 PM)
Ok just vote....
*
in a sc2 sub-forum? are you serious?
radkliler
post Aug 5 2010, 06:37 PM

WUBWUBWUB
*****
Senior Member
985 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
From: Limbo


user posted image
Mgsrulz
post Aug 5 2010, 07:10 PM

30 years of Metal Gear
********
All Stars
14,258 posts

Joined: Mar 2005


should have a "no versus" rule.
valppy
post Aug 5 2010, 07:12 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
39 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
From: non of ur business
why c&c 3 instead of c&c 4?
petrofsky77
post Aug 5 2010, 07:13 PM

Temet nosce
******
Senior Member
1,691 posts

Joined: Jan 2006
From: Neither here nor there



Really? You're serious? No, seriously, I can't tell if you're joking or just pretending to joke ...
noobfc
post Aug 5 2010, 07:16 PM

Peanuts
*****
Senior Member
753 posts

Joined: Jan 2008



kaneeeeeeeeeeeeee
TSwilsonphua
post Aug 5 2010, 07:58 PM

Gear Up. Game On.
*******
Senior Member
2,152 posts

Joined: Nov 2008
QUOTE(valppy @ Aug 5 2010, 07:12 PM)
why c&c 3 instead of c&c 4?
*
because c&c4 tiberian twilight sucks to the max!! no base building and resource gathering wtF!

but seems like SC2 beats c&c3 maybe cause this is a SC2 sub forum
Cheesenium
post Aug 5 2010, 08:04 PM

Vigilo Confido
*******
Senior Member
4,852 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
QUOTE(wilsonphua @ Aug 5 2010, 07:58 PM)
because c&c4 tiberian twilight sucks to the max!! no base building and resource gathering wtF!

but seems like SC2 beats c&c3 maybe cause this is a SC2 sub forum
*
Seriously, are you just dumb or are you trolling here intentionally?
Quazacolt
post Aug 5 2010, 08:26 PM

Riding couple
*******
Senior Member
5,366 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
From: KL Malaysia


QUOTE(wilsonphua @ Aug 5 2010, 07:58 PM)
because c&c4 tiberian twilight sucks to the max!! no base building and resource gathering wtF!

but seems like SC2 beats c&c3 maybe cause this is a SC2 sub forum
*
>seems like

so much win.
ericpires
post Aug 5 2010, 08:33 PM

Arsenal FC
*******
Senior Member
2,657 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
From: Highbury House, 75 Drayton Park, London


Both sux... Dune 2 FTW!!!
radkliler
post Aug 5 2010, 08:44 PM

WUBWUBWUB
*****
Senior Member
985 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
From: Limbo


CnC3 is better than SCII since I don't have to wait 12 years for the same old shit.
user posted image
Grif
post Aug 5 2010, 09:01 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
378 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
From: Kuching, Sarawak


Obvious troll is obvious.
Laguna
post Aug 5 2010, 09:04 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
313 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


Dude it's so easy to choose between those two in terms of graphics ,strategy and units building ^^ Starcraft 2 !!!!
shenshenshen
post Aug 5 2010, 10:53 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,368 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: Kuala Lumpur



sc2....the wait was worth it....
Gormaz
post Aug 5 2010, 11:04 PM

Space Dwarf
****
Senior Member
576 posts

Joined: May 2008
From: Not here


Oh man, if only they took a character of the stature of Kaine and put it into Raynor's (or Mengsk, or Kerrigan... or any big character in the SP campaign) shoes it could have made the story much much better.

Command and Conquers game usually only kept me interested through the story and videos
Mr_47
post Aug 5 2010, 11:11 PM

***NOT MODERATOR *** Post : +10,000,000,00 Warn: 100%
*******
Senior Member
4,337 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Bora-bora u jelly? Special: Age of multi-monitor



bs .... put kane wrath ler
Quazacolt
post Aug 5 2010, 11:35 PM

Riding couple
*******
Senior Member
5,366 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
From: KL Malaysia


QUOTE(Gormaz @ Aug 5 2010, 11:04 PM)
Oh man, if only they took a character of the stature of Kaine and put it into Raynor's (or Mengsk, or Kerrigan... or any big character in the SP campaign) shoes it could have made the story much much better.

Command and Conquers game usually only kept me interested through the story and videos
*
tanya groin kick. left a solid impression to me wwwwwwww
Instant_noodle
post Aug 6 2010, 10:12 AM

nyaaa~~
*******
Senior Member
2,780 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
From: yokumo village
i dun care, and dun mind about the wait, as long as the quality is there and they never add 'forever' in the end of their title and made jimmy kick someone's behind and chew bubble gums... well, he's all outta gums...

btw, how would a supposed-to-be-trilogy-getting-milked-heavily game that started as one of RTS epic game title ends with the supposedly-to-be-all-evil-mythical-characteristic icon turned up to be a good guy after all those ruthless murders and inhumane experiments being done to innocents, walking thru a giant cu--... in mean vagi--... i mean female private part..., compared with SC2?

would one be happy if Deathwing in the next WoW: Cataclysm getting headshot by a drunkard dwarf huntard who accidentally fired a shot after stumbled on his tail???

a game with empty content (like sammy-the-srs) is fine, but anti-climax good game is as bad as telling someone his gear score is not up to par for some encounter in D&D table top.
peinsama
post Aug 6 2010, 10:50 AM

Au fait
*****
Senior Member
725 posts

Joined: Apr 2008
From: Kuala Lumpur


Command and Conquer 3 : Kane's Wrath ftw.
goldfries
post Aug 6 2010, 11:26 AM

40K Club
Group Icon
Forum Admin
44,415 posts

Joined: Jan 2003




wahh got people vote for TW, i'm surprised.
skystrike
post Aug 6 2010, 11:33 AM

back to normal
******
Senior Member
1,279 posts

Joined: Jul 2008
From: behind you...


if u guys realized....protoss mothership is almost same with scrin mothership...
kianweic
post Aug 6 2010, 11:36 AM

Work hard, play hard.
*******
Senior Member
3,809 posts

Joined: Sep 2007
From: Jakarta


Starcraft 2 Wings of Liberty vs C&C3 Tiberium Wars

Really new game vs really old game
aLertz
post Aug 6 2010, 11:39 AM

Overconfidence is a flimsy shield
******
Senior Member
1,111 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
From: TaiPinG / Singapore



no doubt & no fight... doh.gif
SUSsoundsyst64
post Aug 6 2010, 11:40 AM

I'm No-Longer-Noobs
*******
Senior Member
3,725 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: In /hardware/

QUOTE(kianweic @ Aug 6 2010, 11:36 AM)
Starcraft 2 Wings of Liberty vs C&C3 Tiberium Wars

Really new game vs really old game
*
i can consider if...

starcraft 1 vs C&C3 Tiberium Wars biggrin.gif
Quazacolt
post Aug 6 2010, 12:30 PM

Riding couple
*******
Senior Member
5,366 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
From: KL Malaysia


QUOTE(soundsyst64 @ Aug 6 2010, 11:40 AM)
i can consider if...

starcraft 1 vs C&C3 Tiberium Wars biggrin.gif
*
go tell that to the koreans and its a lost cause as well
Cheesenium
post Aug 6 2010, 12:36 PM

Vigilo Confido
*******
Senior Member
4,852 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
QUOTE(soundsyst64 @ Aug 6 2010, 11:40 AM)
i can consider if...

starcraft 1 vs C&C3 Tiberium Wars biggrin.gif
*
Because it has designed by the same lead designer.
Mio4Ever
post Aug 6 2010, 01:29 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
59 posts

Joined: May 2009
Oh, 11 people voted wrongly.
Quazacolt
post Aug 6 2010, 03:49 PM

Riding couple
*******
Senior Member
5,366 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
From: KL Malaysia


QUOTE(Mio4Ever @ Aug 6 2010, 01:29 PM)
Oh, 11 people voted wrongly.
*
rofl this
popcorn513
post Aug 6 2010, 03:54 PM

僕は戦闘機君は航空母艦
******
Senior Member
1,332 posts

Joined: Nov 2005


Should be comparing SC2 vs Warcraft 3, then warcraft 3 will win
TSwilsonphua
post Aug 6 2010, 10:56 PM

Gear Up. Game On.
*******
Senior Member
2,152 posts

Joined: Nov 2008
QUOTE(popcorn513 @ Aug 6 2010, 03:54 PM)
Should be comparing SC2 vs Warcraft 3, then warcraft 3 will win
*
but I thought Warcraft 3 is DotA?
NumbNut
post Aug 7 2010, 12:09 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
87 posts

Joined: Apr 2010
Since you posted this kind of thread in the SC forum so i voted for Tiberium Wax or watsoever.
lohmaikai
post Aug 7 2010, 12:37 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
493 posts

Joined: May 2010



of cos sc2
Angel of Deth
post Aug 7 2010, 12:42 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,242 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
From: Cheras


i realized Blizzard will released StarCraft II as 3 separate package which each package focus only for one race. After i realized this, i won't buy it because they sure thinking lots of fat cash. Wing of Liberty sold 6.5 millions at the first week and still going strong and calculate yourself the possibility of megabucks that they will earn when the other 2 will be released.
lohmaikai
post Aug 7 2010, 12:49 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
493 posts

Joined: May 2010



QUOTE(Angel of Deth @ Aug 7 2010, 12:42 AM)
i realized Blizzard will released StarCraft II as 3 separate package which each package focus only for one race. After i realized this, i won't buy it because they sure thinking lots of fat cash. Wing of Liberty sold 6.5 millions at the first week and still going strong and calculate yourself the possibility of megabucks that they will earn when the other 2 will be released.
*
Because game companies realise expansions/DLC is big bucks $$$$
First get u hooked, then slowly reel u in
Angel of Deth
post Aug 7 2010, 01:00 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,242 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
From: Cheras


Blizzard has been quiet for some years. And they surely has planned this from the very beginning. Why don't they merge all the 3 campaign into 1 package? All the reason i can think is they care about money because they know the millions of fan has wait for a long time for the sequel, hence the long time has generated the hype surrounding the game. No doubt, it is a great game but Blizzard look greedy.

This post has been edited by Angel of Deth: Aug 7 2010, 01:01 AM
InkySliwinky
post Aug 7 2010, 07:07 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
6 posts

Joined: Jan 2009
They/re both quite different ... whats there to compare ...
Grif
post Aug 7 2010, 08:03 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
378 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
From: Kuching, Sarawak


QUOTE(Angel of Deth @ Aug 7 2010, 01:00 AM)
Blizzard has been quiet for some years. And they surely has planned this from the very beginning. Why don't they merge all the 3 campaign into 1 package? All the reason i can think is they care about money because they know the millions of fan has wait for a long time for the sequel, hence the long time has generated the hype surrounding the game. No doubt, it is a great game but Blizzard look greedy.
*
On the bright side, I prefer Blizzard style compared to the abomination that is C&C 4. Let's face it, gaming companies are now about making profits. Not to slave for you for free.
goldfries
post Aug 7 2010, 08:14 AM

40K Club
Group Icon
Forum Admin
44,415 posts

Joined: Jan 2003




cnc4 lousy like silly la. internet connection alone kacau.

game style totally stray from the resource gathering type. the whole game was finished with mostly spamming and occasional careful movement. micromanagement almost non-existent.

multiplayer was mindless.
Quazacolt
post Aug 8 2010, 06:06 AM

Riding couple
*******
Senior Member
5,366 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
From: KL Malaysia


QUOTE(goldfries @ Aug 7 2010, 08:14 AM)
cnc4 lousy like silly la. internet connection alone kacau.

game style totally stray from the resource gathering type. the whole game was finished with mostly spamming and occasional careful movement. micromanagement almost non-existent.

multiplayer was mindless.
*
that actually got me slightly interested.

you know, sometimes you just wanna play/watch something without using your brain at all.
Grif
post Aug 8 2010, 04:35 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
378 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
From: Kuching, Sarawak


QUOTE(Quazacolt @ Aug 8 2010, 06:06 AM)
that actually got me slightly interested.

you know, sometimes you just wanna play/watch something without using your brain at all.
*
This is even more mindless than your average TF2 game. unsure.gif
Cheesenium
post Aug 8 2010, 04:43 PM

Vigilo Confido
*******
Senior Member
4,852 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
C&C4 MP isnt mindless, it's pointless.
TSwilsonphua
post Aug 8 2010, 05:41 PM

Gear Up. Game On.
*******
Senior Member
2,152 posts

Joined: Nov 2008
QUOTE(Cheesenium @ Aug 8 2010, 04:43 PM)
C&C4 MP isnt mindless, it's pointless.
*
Electronic Arts ruins Tiberian twilight



....or maybe, anything with the "Twilight" name in it will suck
kianweic
post Aug 8 2010, 06:21 PM

Work hard, play hard.
*******
Senior Member
3,809 posts

Joined: Sep 2007
From: Jakarta


QUOTE(wilsonphua @ Aug 8 2010, 05:41 PM)
Electronic Arts ruins Tiberian twilight
....or maybe, anything with the "Twilight" name in it will suck
*
Did you buy Starcraft 2?
Quazacolt
post Aug 8 2010, 09:18 PM

Riding couple
*******
Senior Member
5,366 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
From: KL Malaysia


QUOTE(Cheesenium @ Aug 8 2010, 04:43 PM)
C&C4 MP isnt mindless, it's pointless.
*
but i thought EA is good D:
kianweic
post Aug 8 2010, 10:35 PM

Work hard, play hard.
*******
Senior Member
3,809 posts

Joined: Sep 2007
From: Jakarta


QUOTE(wilsonphua @ Aug 8 2010, 05:41 PM)
Electronic Arts ruins Tiberian twilight
....or maybe, anything with the "Twilight" name in it will suck
*
Since you got your answer, perhaps it's time to close this thread.

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0587sec    0.25    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 30th November 2025 - 03:59 AM