Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 The Solid State Storage Thread

views
     
hosealwh
post Sep 23 2010, 01:58 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
35 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
QUOTE(ronaldjoe @ Sep 23 2010, 10:40 AM)
Especially those on Sandforce controller... tongue.gif It just would just die and bye bye.
*
Then consumer grade of SSD and even HDD don't suit you. You need to pay more for enterprise grade drives.
Also, SSD upgrade is perhaps better than even ram upgrade.

Some might say 10 sec program loading reduce to 5 sec loading like not significant but hey if you open programs day to day, how many seconds you have saved?
Especially you are in a rush to do something, what would you feel when something response slow like a snail?
hosealwh
post Sep 24 2010, 05:49 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
35 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
QUOTE(clawhammer @ Sep 24 2010, 01:38 PM)
You basically want to improve the read speed of the OS, applications and games you're running hence you put all of these on the SSD drive. Photos, videos, documents, etc should go to the conventional platter drive. By doing this, everything in Windows would be snappier because of the improved response time from the SSD. Remember that most of the time, the bottleneck is with the hard disk drive, not our RAM or CPU. The SSD helps in this area by reducing the bottleneck.
*
+1 smile.gif
Typically, people keep complaining about SSD's reliability and price but do not actually own a SSD drive. Get 1 and it will change your mind.

To show the performance difference, here is the benchmark screenshot of my own entry level SSD and F3 1TB:

Attached Image Attached Image

Please don't compare to the internet reviews as I just wanted to show my own experience of the performance difference.


Added on September 24, 2010, 5:57 pm
QUOTE(pergilahsayang @ Sep 24 2010, 05:39 PM)
Sometimes when browsing the net related to SSD, i stumble upon some web discussing the issue of "SSD have higher failure rate". Though i do not dig deep into it. The only link im able to recall is:

http://hothardware.com/News/SSDs-Have-High-Failure-Rate/
*
doh.gif Please look at the date of the article and it is very vague. Technology is moving fast and nowadays flash memory has a much higher write cycles already.


This post has been edited by hosealwh: Sep 24 2010, 05:57 PM
hosealwh
post Sep 25 2010, 12:53 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
35 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
QUOTE(zsnipes @ Sep 24 2010, 11:48 PM)
The TRIM run onto the SSD drive because of SSD is using Flash Based.
May I know is our 64GB Thumb Drive (Flash Based) can run the TRIM to refresh its flash memory inside to improve its performance ?
*
AFAIK, TRIM is flash controller based and it needs to be support by OS as well. Basically I don't see a need for thumb drive to have this function as they are not being wrote often as much like SSD.

There are reasons why SSDs are more expensive then thumb drives.

This post has been edited by hosealwh: Sep 25 2010, 12:58 AM

Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0438sec    0.39    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 2nd December 2025 - 07:29 PM