Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 The Solid State Storage Thread

views
     
dtdw
post Aug 26 2010, 04:56 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
425 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(everling @ Aug 25 2010, 01:45 PM)
If its for games, there's less value in getting an SSD RAID setup. A single SSD alone will feel like better than RAIDed HDDs and games have a tendency to be CPU or GPU bottlenecked.
*
QUOTE(saturn85 @ Aug 25 2010, 01:58 PM)
haha, just to minimize the loading time. biggrin.gif
*
yep. ever played sc2 with the stupid loading bar destroying your mood ? sweat.gif

anyway your statement aint very clear for the first sentence compared to your 2nd. i guess it's less value getting HDD raid setup. tongue.gif

ssd raid will shave 1.2 roughly seconds in boot as seen on the video. but it's true you dont need to raid it, unless strike lottery.

wait for 1 more year and it will be USD 0.50 per gigabyte.
dtdw
post Aug 26 2010, 11:54 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
425 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(everling @ Aug 26 2010, 09:17 PM)
If I have done my calculations right, starting next year, it will take about 3 years for the prices to hit about USD 0.50/GB. Assuming Moore's curves, of doubling the transistor count every 18 months, holds out for that long.

It may also take less than 6 years for the prices to hit about RM 0.50/GB.
*
Not sure where i've sourced it but prices are gonna fall to USD 1/gb by end of this year.

This is more than moores law. It's kinda like an explosion. Lightspeed may hit the market way slower, because when enterprise ssd becomes consumer grade = 500mb+ read/write. okay off topic.

Anyway to the person who says let it hit RM 100-200. I'd say when it hit 1gb/dollar, it is a good time to buy. Think of it as PC on steroid.

You've upgraded every single component on your pc, and want it faster. You're willing to spend thousands on cpu. Another thousand on Mobo+Ram combo. Hey, why not add another thousand and put those games and photoshop on steroid ?


Added on August 27, 2010, 12:01 am
QUOTE(samftrmd @ Aug 26 2010, 05:31 PM)
I know that Sims 2 and 3 are HDD intensive games. will SSd improve the items and sound loading and game loading and..... Anyone who has SSD tried before?
*
No ssd yet. But i've had a solution.

Open your case and put your ears at the HDD. If you hear HDD groaning while your' loading a level or in the middle of something, it is seeking data.
If you hear it way lot more, than it's constantly seeking, which would mean, ssd win due to low seeking time.

Most rts games dont seek because when it's loaded the whole thing is thrown it.

RPG seeks. because throwing the whole thing in is insane, imposible. In such situation ssd helps by low seeking time + 275mb read access.

This post has been edited by dtdw: Aug 27 2010, 12:01 AM
dtdw
post Aug 28 2010, 11:01 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
425 posts

Joined: Apr 2006



» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


well we wont know how fast prices can fall. but if based on intel's roadmap, they always do a refresh at the same price. ok mayb not always, but assuming 160 refresh to 300 at the same price as now. which the cheapest i found in forum would be 1.3k ? and they're introducing 600gb. give them a year more and that 300 will be 600 @ 1.3k again .. yep it's fast.

i for one, dont know what the heck is 10k rpm lying around anymore. let the alone the hybrid.

*yea i think it's lightspeak but whatever lol ... i had no interest in that far of a future ..
dtdw
post Sep 1 2010, 09:53 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
425 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


one must rmb that it took years for hdd to fall to this low, partly due to size increase and parts are widely available making reduced manufacturing cost.

ssd has effect on hdd price somewhere or another, since many consider ssd main with 2tb backup.

but you forgot how exp those 20/40/80gb were, and you're dying to get a pay check so that you can buy it, coz you dont have enuf space, or it always die on you once a year. (i'm a victim of dead hdd) lol ..

and then not forgetting the noobish days when you complain the pc is slow, and someone smarter just say " upgrade your ram, buy another stick and shove it in " .. hahah .. and ram aint cheap before ..

so now you have the best option, get ssd, at the exp price you spent on pata hdd, and ram .. and no more complains tongue.gif
dtdw
post Sep 15 2010, 10:41 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
425 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(zsnipes @ Sep 15 2010, 12:48 AM)
Oh, I just using for Windows & Software only, mostly need READING speed.
If I want find a FASTEST READ & WRITE, then it will be headache for me, hard to choose & not much model came with both good read & write speed.
That's why I better look for the BEST READING speed is enough, save my headache. rclxub.gif

I'm still doubt about the realibility of a SDD over HDD.
Anyway, the drive will sit in my casing, & won't move, so, no worry about dropping & spoil for HDD.
I give myself to use a single HDD/SDD maximum to 4 years, then I will replace it to newer drive. For OS & Data drive too.

Someone here say SSD is more reliable & some say opposite.
So, is there any reliable facts to read about ?

thanks.
*
like previous post, it depends. ssd is more prone to write limitation. but it can be considered a myth.

head over to http://www.storagesearch.com/ssdmyths-endurance.html

regarding your faster read > write. Your decision should be based on controllers. There are lots of controllers floating around. intel / indilinx / sandfore / i dont even care. lol . mayb iops matters but i dont have the time to dig for such info.

read and write currently are more or less few MB difference. What you should look at other than controller is maximum achieved by sata 2 or sata 3. the later obviously owns.
dtdw
post Sep 17 2010, 02:41 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
425 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


komag i tot i was hacked ..dam u lol ..

anyway while trying to understand more bout ssd, i stumbled upon pcie interface. ocz has made a revo but it is silent in the market coz ppl r stil skeptic about ssd.

but as nand begin to shrink nm and prices fall, and people are hitting sata3 limit, perhaps pcie will kick in. but it will take another 10 more years. too slow.

the thing about revox2 is that it has already surpased sata3. but x2 price remain unknown whether it will replace x1 with the same price. currently its about .. 400usd for 120gb, not too expensive.

im gonna check if suppliers around LY brings in such model. but its 99.99% unlikely and has to be ordered.

This post has been edited by dtdw: Sep 17 2010, 02:44 PM
dtdw
post Sep 19 2010, 09:27 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
425 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(clawhammer @ Sep 19 2010, 12:17 AM)
People have to start understand that SSD uses NAND and thus it might show a big difference in benchmarks (just like RAM), real world performance is not that noticeable. Do you notice a big difference running DDR3-1333 and DDR3-2000? The answer is "NO", you get good benchmark scores but you don't literally feel it. This is because most of the time, Windows apps and games tends to read multiple small files. If you're talking about reading huge files then yes, the difference is more substantial. RAID-0 would make things a bit faster but not much. Again, it looks good in benchmarks but in real world computing, the difference is minimal. I would say 1-2 secs faster in certain tasks.

What makes the SSD fast is the random access time and if you notice, all SSD's have 0.x ms so they are all more or less the same. Another problem is we have tons of people that does not own an SSD but after reading around the Internet, they start advicing and giving the wrong information. I am one of the early users of SSD and I can tell you that 1 x SSD would be ideal. RAID-0 SSD is only if you have extra cash and don't know what to spend on smile.gif
*
I am one of the many who don't own one yet and start giving advises. lol. but my advice is more realistic and based on lots of sources including YouTube. truth be told some ppl raid it but it kinda slowed it compared to single. for example ncix 8 ssd crysis. so based on that we can advice ppl to be aware of raiding it.
dtdw
post Sep 21 2010, 10:40 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
425 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(Onion-KiD @ Sep 20 2010, 10:42 PM)
Ic... thank clawhammer for explain. because in future 80GB might no enough for store software, was thinking how about raid it to get it to 160GB or just buy another piece (bigger space ofcos).
*
it really depends on what you want. do you want space OR speed ? as far as raiding goes, its on a different level. Its like trying to OC your processor to 4ghz and testing stability for weeks and months.

in short, its like what claw said, waste alot of time. =P

i realise many people here kinda derive from a crossfire/sli background, and thinks raid is the same. even if it is the same, not all sli works like a charm, and at times i'd rather buy a single more powderful card.

one simple advice. get a sandforce controlled 120gb as main, and keep intelG2 as secondary, and ofcourse 1tb whatsoever as overall backup. smile.gif
dtdw
post Sep 22 2010, 10:03 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
425 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(everling @ Sep 21 2010, 07:27 PM)
Two SSDs? blink.gif

You are clearly too rich already and have too many huge applications and games that you need to run at the same time.  nod.gif
*
err lol not me .. i was just telling the person before the post since he already has intelG2. there's two choice : raid it or get a new one. the less hassle and have trim support is to buy a faster main, and keep G2 as not-too-slow-loading-less-intensive-apps .. XD

>billy

impatient is the word. facing office pc with PATA hdd, and going back home with just mediocre SATA hdd, well that makes a very frustrating day. hahah
dtdw
post Sep 23 2010, 10:10 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
425 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(Onion-KiD @ Sep 22 2010, 06:33 PM)
Ah dtdw, I just dreaming dreaming + dreaming and suddenly got question at there. So asking for knowledge ma  cry.gif
pls allow people dreaming and imagines if get another piece and asking to gain knowledge  cry.gif
*
hahah .. dream on(joke)


btw i just read that by raiding it, you gain insane read speeds. some test owned crucial sata3. but the write speeds is .. meh ... rather wait for G3 tongue.gif
dtdw
post Sep 24 2010, 11:37 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
425 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(ronaldjoe @ Sep 24 2010, 10:22 AM)
OCZ Vertex 2 FTW with Sata II
*
i would think so too. and with the recent price cut from a certain seller here. 120gb is at a sweet spot with lowest gb per RM. i think its RM 9 per.

but stil playing a waiting game as it is dropping quite fast. tongue.gif

regarding sc2, without a doubt ssd would save the day.
dtdw
post Sep 24 2010, 12:06 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
425 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


its funny how people just come here and want fast cheap yes no answers. its like asking is intel faster than amd ?
dtdw
post Sep 25 2010, 12:48 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
425 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


the one who quoted 7.5 per gb. hmm that's if u do direct conversion using xe.com I suppose. it's imposible to get that rate.
dtdw
post Sep 29 2010, 10:39 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
425 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(iZZiDeltA @ Sep 29 2010, 01:43 AM)
One more reason to upgrade to ssd now,

http://www.storagereview.com/ocz_onyx_2_ssd_announced

120gb priced at $189 only!
With read write speed up to 270MBps
*
sometimes you just wish you'd born in a tech advanced world eh? latest stuffs can get instantly and no need rugi conversion. and always get rebate rebate. unlike here even after bargain stil so exp. lol
dtdw
post Sep 30 2010, 10:16 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
425 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


yeah ibis ... insane ... price assume also insane .. but if adoption is fast, then price drop will also be fast.

but that just makes me like ocz even more. always inovating.


Added on September 30, 2010, 10:23 am
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


well techs are getting faster but apps are not getting that much heavy-er. so its sure thing it gets fast with a lower cost.

but to reach 10k, it is possible if you buy a new setup compared to just upgrade, coz a few things dont change : monitor, psu, cooling, and hdd.

This post has been edited by dtdw: Sep 30 2010, 10:23 AM
dtdw
post Oct 2 2010, 10:07 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
425 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


i find it hard to believe 700+mb virus scanning. hmm.gif

QUOTE(cstkl1 @ Oct 1 2010, 02:02 PM)
user posted image
*
dtdw
post Oct 4 2010, 10:15 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
425 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(cstkl1 @ Oct 2 2010, 11:44 AM)
ok y??
its actually lower than what i expected ...

please enlightened me

new score keeping this for 24/7 lol
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


well .. because each ssd reads maximum of 300 ? and if just two becomes 600 ?

unless it actually depends on ram as well .. or test suite is flawed.. tongue.gif
dtdw
post Oct 7 2010, 10:20 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
425 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(Boomeraangkid @ Oct 6 2010, 05:56 PM)
a SSD cant effect HDD write speed right? I cant use anything much with 40GB right  laugh.gif
*
nope. and nope. tongue.gif

80gb perhaps. when gen3 comes out, which hopefully adjusted to the price of current 40gb.
dtdw
post Oct 18 2010, 11:57 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
425 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


in 5 years, a new tech will be out to replace ssd, with faster speed and reliability. and drastic drop will not be possible, but each month it drops a few cents maybe. so its ok to say it will drop in 5 years to match the current hdd price.

but it will never catch up, coz hdd will feature 5tb and above, while ssd will not, at the same price. at least until the density of hdd is reaching its limit and prices goes up.
dtdw
post Oct 19 2010, 09:29 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
425 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(everling @ Oct 18 2010, 12:33 PM)
Do you have any new technology in mind?

Because HDDs was the main storage technology for well over two decades. It is only in the last few years that we saw the introduction of SSDs as a serious alternative main storage technology. And it took well over a decade to get Flash technology from thumbdrives into SSDs.

As far as I know, we don't have yet another serious alternative storage method out in the market in some manner at this time. Because of this, I doubt that we would see yet another serious main storage technology to appear by 2016. And even if it did, I doubt that it would be affordable to the masses, like SSDs are now, by 2016.
*
perhaps you are right, it will take very long to replace ssd. but maybe i meant tech that adds speed and reliability on ssd, which is new controller tech which bring reliability and speed, more so than a hdd that only increase the rpm and nothing else.

2 Pages  1 2 >Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0246sec    0.78    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 30th November 2025 - 02:37 PM