Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
7 Pages « < 4 5 6 7 >Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 The Solid State Storage Thread

views
     
owikh84
post Sep 22 2011, 10:44 PM

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



Intel 320s G3 160GB
user posted image
user posted image
owikh84
post Sep 23 2011, 09:55 AM

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



QUOTE(ywkwy @ Sep 23 2011, 09:01 AM)
OK, I've confirm my laptop mobo support SATA 3 and Im going to get the Crucial M4 128GB SSD from bhphotovideo.. Anyone want to share the shipping cost?
*
U can open a proper sale thread in Garage Sales/ Bulk. Still got one week to go before the promo ends.
owikh84
post Sep 23 2011, 11:06 AM

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



QUOTE(riku2replica @ Sep 23 2011, 10:31 AM)
Judging from the speed, it looks like Sata 2 SSD speed.
*
Yes, G3 is based on SATA2.
So u wont see 500MBps on this unless ure going to raid it.
owikh84
post Sep 28 2011, 06:00 PM

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



QUOTE(iaknesnah @ Sep 28 2011, 03:47 PM)
i believe someone said it before m4 garbage collection is not as good as intel. but i also believe someone also said crucial make the ssd for intel?? hmmm hmm.gif
*
Couldn't be true coz Crucial SSD is made by Micron in SG.
owikh84
post Oct 10 2011, 11:12 PM

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



Crucial and Intel SSDs are more reliable.
U don't need those unstable SF based SSDs.
owikh84
post Oct 10 2011, 11:30 PM

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



QUOTE(kelvin_hata @ Oct 10 2011, 11:14 PM)
can giv more information?  biggrin.gif
*
Sandforce vs Marvell

QUOTE(owikh84 @ Apr 28 2011, 12:34 AM)
I'd say C300 128GB is the best SSD in the market atm.
4K Random Read is the most important thing for 97% of users, primarily at QD1.
The C300 is still the fastest at 4K reads from QD 1 to 4 and it stands its ground with 4K writes as well, even beats out the newer M4.
[attachmentid=2182448]
*

owikh84
post Oct 18 2011, 11:34 AM

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



QUOTE(iaknesnah @ Oct 18 2011, 11:04 AM)
So SandForce has officially identified the BSOD bug, and released some firmware. OCZ is getting it first.

http://www.anandtech.com/show/4973/sandfor...available-today

hope this can really solve the problems for good
*
Good news if it is true that the latest FW will fix the BSOD bug since it's been a year after the launch.

I'm going to grab some SF-based SSDs if it's fixed.



owikh84
post Oct 26 2011, 09:11 AM

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



Samsung SSD 830 listed on Samsung website

user posted image

Desktop Kit or Laptop Kit
64GB: $129.99 w/Norton Ghost 15
128GB: $229.99 w/Norton Ghost 15
256GB: $429.99 w/Norton Ghost 15
512GB: $849.99 w/Norton Ghost 15
http://www.samsung.com/us/computer/solid-state-drives

64GB and 128GB are available @ newegg

QUOTE
2.5" 7mm (Ultraslim) Form Factor
Up to 520MB/s Sequential Read Speed
Up to 320MB/s Sequential Write Speed
80K IOPS Random Read Speed
30K IOPS Random Write Speed
owikh84
post Oct 27 2011, 09:12 AM

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



The RMA of the SSD


- Intel 0.1% (against 0.3%)
- Crucial 0.8% (against 1.9%)
- Corsair 2.9% (against 2.7%)
- OCZ 4.2% (against 3.5%)

Intel confirms its first place with a return rate of the most impressive. It is followed from Crucial, which significantly improves the rate but it must be said that the latter was heavily impacted by the M225 - the C300 is only reached 1%. The return rate for failure are up against Corsair and OCZ especially in the latter confirmed by far his last position. 8 SSDs are beyond the 5%:

- 9.14% 2 240 GB OCZ Vertex
- 8.61% 2 120 GB OCZ Agility
- 7.27% 40GB OCZ Agility 2
- 6.20% 60GB OCZ Agility 2
- 5.83% 80 GB Corsair Force
- 5.31% 90GB OCZ Agility 2
- 5.31% 2 100 GB OCZ Vertex
- 5.04% OCZ Agility 2 3.5 "120 GB

Note the courage of Corsair Force 80, who came to be inserted between cousins ​​OCZ based SandForce ...

Source
owikh84
post Oct 28 2011, 08:31 AM

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



QUOTE(alpha_numeric182 @ Oct 27 2011, 09:51 PM)
What about the Crucial M4 64GB? Is it worth the extra few ringgit?
*
M4 is doing great at random 4k usage in the QD1-3 range where most desktop activities take place.
user posted image

Updated top NewEgg Sellers:
user posted image

owikh84
post Nov 2 2011, 05:30 PM

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



QUOTE(rudolfjie @ Nov 2 2011, 05:23 PM)
Hi everyone, new to this threat, nice discussion  around here

Just get an OCZ Agility 3 64GB, so far quite happy with the performance....until now when i bench with AS SSD, what my results are 190m/s read & 98m/s write.. all sifu sifu here know why? is'it normal?

or should i use others benchmarking software?

Thanks in advance
*
I think u put the SSD on SATA2 port, supposed to install it on SATA3 to get the max speeds.
owikh84
post Nov 3 2011, 03:22 PM

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



QUOTE(iaknesnah @ Nov 3 2011, 03:09 PM)
lol better use chrome then. btw i tried using firefox its ok on my side.. rclxub.gif
*
i got this laggy FF problem after trying that optimization tips/tweaks. rclxub.gif
btw, i'm on raid0 Crucial M4's
owikh84
post Nov 3 2011, 03:29 PM

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



QUOTE(iaknesnah @ Nov 3 2011, 03:24 PM)
LOL thats wierd.. i am on raid 0 320 series but no laggy.. also after the tweaks biggrin.gif


Added on November 3, 2011, 3:25 pmbut i've been using chrome all this while. just tried downloading FF last few days and playing with it but seems ok here
*
Don't know why bro maybe it's becoz i direct the download to my HDD.
I will try point it to my SSD and see how by tonight.
owikh84
post Nov 9 2011, 04:45 PM

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



QUOTE(mizi28 @ Nov 9 2011, 12:04 PM)
thx for answering,i googled crucial M4,i dont see any statement/advertisement says M4 support TRIM,does it supports TRIM?
*
M4 is TRIM supported
user posted image

QUOTE(feunul @ Nov 9 2011, 04:32 PM)
My problem is finish.
this is my latest Corsair force3 120 GB benchmark..
*
how did u solve your issue? hmm.gif
owikh84
post Nov 10 2011, 12:53 PM

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



QUOTE(mizi28 @ Nov 10 2011, 12:33 PM)
joining SSD camp.first time SSD user here
*
Nice! Pls share some benchmarks drool.gif
flash FW to the latest version 009 if it's not, to get 20% improvement.

This post has been edited by owikh84: Nov 10 2011, 12:53 PM
owikh84
post Nov 11 2011, 03:42 PM

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



I believe u need to do some windows tweaking to get results like this:

user posted image
owikh84
post Nov 11 2011, 03:53 PM

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



QUOTE(mizi28 @ Nov 11 2011, 03:47 PM)
latest result after installing m/b driver

what kind of tweaking should i do?
*
Impressive! now those are the correct speeds

SSD Optimization

owikh84
post Nov 11 2011, 05:03 PM

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



QUOTE(kelvin_hata @ Nov 11 2011, 04:42 PM)
M4 is the faster speed in 4k smile.gif

too bad.. my sponsor is not crucial sad.gif
*
in fact Crucial owns any SSD in 4K
4K Random Read, primarily Q1 is the most important thing for 97% of users.

user posted imageuser posted image

This post has been edited by owikh84: Nov 11 2011, 05:04 PM
owikh84
post Nov 20 2011, 10:16 AM

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



good news for SSDs in raid



QUOTE
SSDs in RAID Get TRIM, Don't Lose Performance Anymore
Those who did, though, may have noticed a particular line that says “this release will not enable the TRIM on RAID0 feature, but it will be added in the next RST 11.5 release. Contact your RST AE representative with questions.”
SOS
owikh84
post Dec 7 2011, 04:19 PM

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



Intel 520 Series SSD to Utilize SandForce Controller

QUOTE
The new Intel 520 Series SSD will be backed by Intel's 5-year warranty, upholding to Intel's long-standing reputation on reliability. This does question if Intel has modified the SandForce SF-22xx controller's firmware with its own "tweak" to help with its widely known random BSOD issues. The original release of the Intel 520 Series SSD was slated for November, now come and gone. This leaves us to believe the drive is set to be released any time--but based on the information provided by Softpedia, it looks more like a Q1 2012 release date.


5 years on SF controller notworthy.gif

7 Pages « < 4 5 6 7 >Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0259sec    0.56    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 2nd December 2025 - 11:57 AM