Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Hardware The New MacBook/MacBook Pro/Air Users Thread v6, Share your joy and hopefully no pain :)

views
     
Eithanius
post Aug 18 2010, 01:37 AM

::+::KukuNius(tm)::+::
*******
Senior Member
3,952 posts

Joined: Apr 2005
From: Sector 1921B, Delta Quadrant


user posted image

This post has been edited by Eithanius: Aug 18 2010, 01:37 AM
Eithanius
post Aug 18 2010, 02:49 AM

::+::KukuNius(tm)::+::
*******
Senior Member
3,952 posts

Joined: Apr 2005
From: Sector 1921B, Delta Quadrant


QUOTE(doctorpopcorn @ Aug 18 2010, 02:01 AM)
Just got my 2.53GHz i5 15" MacBok Pro two days ago. So far so good. Loving it. I'm proud to join the cult that is Apple Fanboi-ism. =p
*
I'm curious... On what grounds did you opt for 2.53GHz i5 and neither 2.4GHz i5 nor 2.66GHz i7...?

I don't mean to offend you, the reason I asked was that a lot of ppl think of 2.53GHz spec stuck right in the middle of 2.4GHz and 2.66GHz - with most opt for basic 2.4GHz with plans to upgrade on every MBP revisions, and 2.66GHz for them to last few years. 2.53GHz model however to these ppl are a waste of money as it brings very minute performance superiority over 2.4GHz, having similar amount of RAM and VRAM. A 180GB difference in HDD capacity and a 0.13GHz processing speed do not even justify the additional RM 600 (retail price) over the 2.4GHz model.

This post has been edited by Eithanius: Aug 18 2010, 02:59 AM
Eithanius
post Aug 19 2010, 12:11 AM

::+::KukuNius(tm)::+::
*******
Senior Member
3,952 posts

Joined: Apr 2005
From: Sector 1921B, Delta Quadrant


QUOTE(doctorpopcorn @ Aug 18 2010, 11:09 PM)
Yeah I actually had this dilemma when i was buying the MBP. I know the extra .13 GHz would have just a slight impact on boot time, file transfer time, video rendering time, etc., but for some reason i valued the 500GB HDD highly and thought that plus the slight superiority in processing power was worth the 600 bucks.

Having said that, I understand where you're coming from. And I'm now thinking if i made a mistake in getting this model. But what the heck, the money's been spent and I'm happy with it. So yeah.
*
Don't worry, you'll still get plenty of fun with an MBP... biggrin.gif
Eithanius
post Aug 21 2010, 11:13 AM

::+::KukuNius(tm)::+::
*******
Senior Member
3,952 posts

Joined: Apr 2005
From: Sector 1921B, Delta Quadrant


QUOTE(Howard Tan @ Aug 21 2010, 10:16 AM)
Hi,

What do you guys mean when you say there's no full screen on Safari? Mine looks like this.
*
As in you click on the green button on the top left, right before you do the one below...

QUOTE(Howard Tan @ Aug 21 2010, 10:16 AM)
Have you tried clicking on the three diagonal lines at the bottom right of the window and dragging it all the way to fit your screen?
*
Eithanius
post Aug 21 2010, 11:27 AM

::+::KukuNius(tm)::+::
*******
Senior Member
3,952 posts

Joined: Apr 2005
From: Sector 1921B, Delta Quadrant


QUOTE(Howard Tan @ Aug 21 2010, 11:23 AM)
Yea, the green little button does not bring it to full screen, it just expands big enough to show the entire webpage, so use the three diagonal lines at the bottom right of the window.
*
There are also reasons as to why Apple did not implement the full-screen feature... useful to me for multitasking and drag-and-drop feature...
Eithanius
post Aug 27 2010, 08:40 PM

::+::KukuNius(tm)::+::
*******
Senior Member
3,952 posts

Joined: Apr 2005
From: Sector 1921B, Delta Quadrant


QUOTE(cRazYee @ Aug 27 2010, 08:36 PM)
when you mirror, definitely it will blur
big screen will follow small screen resolution
nothing to do with mac, this is how computer works
*
and there's no way for the smaller screen to handle the optimum resolution of the larger screen, other than the optimum resolution designed for that smaller screen size, so the larger screen will have to "give way" to the smaller resolution of the smaller screen, hence the blurry effect on the external display...

This post has been edited by Eithanius: Aug 27 2010, 08:41 PM
Eithanius
post Aug 30 2010, 05:58 PM

::+::KukuNius(tm)::+::
*******
Senior Member
3,952 posts

Joined: Apr 2005
From: Sector 1921B, Delta Quadrant


15" Core i7, unplugged, running Safari, moderate wireless browsing, 50 - 70% brightness, some other apps running in the background without triggering the nVidia card, I can manage 6 hours...
Eithanius
post Sep 6 2010, 10:22 AM

::+::KukuNius(tm)::+::
*******
Senior Member
3,952 posts

Joined: Apr 2005
From: Sector 1921B, Delta Quadrant


QUOTE(diners @ Sep 6 2010, 09:31 AM)
and i wonder why mine is only 20months but dropped till 77% with only 50 cycles?
*
20 months with only 50 cycles... of course lar... electron tarak bagi jalan, battery pun karat... i did 40 cycles in just 3 months, and for that also I considered plugging it too much to power too often already, not good in the long run...
Eithanius
post Sep 22 2010, 11:00 PM

::+::KukuNius(tm)::+::
*******
Senior Member
3,952 posts

Joined: Apr 2005
From: Sector 1921B, Delta Quadrant


QUOTE(mememe12 @ Sep 22 2010, 10:46 PM)
since u guys tok about download manager.. i feel Download Them All in firefox is very useful.. it can download files from those site like megaupload/rapidshare and etc.. i tried other download manager like Speed Download, cannot do like what DTA can..

but i prefer to use Google Chrome, is there any alternative that can replace DTA at Firefox?
*
What features on DTA that you can't leave without Firefox...? I'm sure you can copy the download links and download manually using DTA...

One thing I don't like about DTA is the inability to control download speed, unlike Speed Download which I can control the bandwidth, so that my Screamyx have room for other users in my household...

This post has been edited by Eithanius: Sep 22 2010, 11:01 PM
Eithanius
post Sep 23 2010, 01:22 AM

::+::KukuNius(tm)::+::
*******
Senior Member
3,952 posts

Joined: Apr 2005
From: Sector 1921B, Delta Quadrant


QUOTE(dvlzplayground @ Sep 23 2010, 12:15 AM)
because DTA is a firefox plugin, not a standalone app. closing firefox meaning closing DTA as well. so far it's my favourite smile.gif but yala, sometimes i quit firefox forgetting that im downloading something haha
*
Nah... it's not that bad once you get used to it... I'm using Safari with DTA, problem is just manual assignment of downloads to DTA.., most of the time I assign heavy downloads via DTA on my desktop PC, I don't need to strain my MBP hdd too much... tongue.gif
Eithanius
post Sep 23 2010, 02:08 AM

::+::KukuNius(tm)::+::
*******
Senior Member
3,952 posts

Joined: Apr 2005
From: Sector 1921B, Delta Quadrant


QUOTE(dvlzplayground @ Sep 23 2010, 01:47 AM)
i've been using it or about 2yrs still havent got used to it haha. DTA doesnt support safari 5 doesnt it?
*
Nope...
Eithanius
post Oct 8 2010, 05:06 PM

::+::KukuNius(tm)::+::
*******
Senior Member
3,952 posts

Joined: Apr 2005
From: Sector 1921B, Delta Quadrant


QUOTE(cRazYee @ Oct 8 2010, 03:01 PM)
i dont wan to do that
i need a software to proper control it
*
http://superuser.com/questions/82282/disab...closed-lid-mode

And if you're competent enough for the last part to mess with kext... tongue.gif

Personally I don't give a damn about any (redundant) software to sleep the display. Just close the damn bloody lid, use my external keyboard to wake it back up, then open the lid again. whistling.gif

I've also contacted Cody Krieger of gfxCardStatus to recommend him implementing such feature on his little piece of software, he's looking into it.... tongue.gif
Eithanius
post Dec 9 2010, 10:50 PM

::+::KukuNius(tm)::+::
*******
Senior Member
3,952 posts

Joined: Apr 2005
From: Sector 1921B, Delta Quadrant


hmm... I've got a Core i7 already, just gotten another 4GB delivered yesterday bump it up to 8GB... next stop - SSD... rclxm9.gif
Eithanius
post Dec 10 2010, 08:36 AM

::+::KukuNius(tm)::+::
*******
Senior Member
3,952 posts

Joined: Apr 2005
From: Sector 1921B, Delta Quadrant


QUOTE(soonwai @ Dec 9 2010, 11:54 PM)
Lots of i7 users here. I've got the MBP i7 too with 8GB Ram and 256mb SSD. Only thing I regret was I didn't get the hi-res screen.
*
I had the same problem... All thanks to Apple for making it just an option... doh.gif

Btw, is that an Apple-configured SSD that you've got...? Or a third-party brand...? Do you download heavily on that SSD, or do you have a backup HDD volume where you download to - like a HDD fitted in an OptiBay or equivalent...?

I've read somewhere that writing extensively on SSD will decrease its performance, and Mac OS X doesn't support TRIM function.

This post has been edited by Eithanius: Dec 10 2010, 08:40 AM
Eithanius
post Dec 11 2010, 02:35 AM

::+::KukuNius(tm)::+::
*******
Senior Member
3,952 posts

Joined: Apr 2005
From: Sector 1921B, Delta Quadrant


QUOTE(soonwai @ Dec 10 2010, 09:40 PM)
Sure can, it'll make the MBP 13" fly.

Cost me RM1870 from the distributor. Low Yat still 2k plus, I think, for 250GB. Let me know if you want one.

Yeah, it's expensive, someone told me that I can buy another notebook for that price, but at least I'm comfy with 250GB. At the very minimum, 160GB. Anything less than that is just not enough.


Added on December 10, 2010, 9:50 pm
The hi-res screen would have been nice but I couldn't wait for Apple to deliver. Since I was already at the Apple shop, I just bought it.  3 weeks later, they came out with the 2.8Ghz option. Grrr.

As for the SSD, it's 3rd party, mine's a Corsair F240. It was an impulse buy. I went to get the OCZ Vertex 2 but they didn't have that at the time, had to wait 2 days. Corsair was in stock so got that on the spot. Both have the same chipset, almost same performance. OCZ is supposed to have better firmware but what the heck.

I do some download, not too much. The MBP is my workhorse. It's paired with a 500GB Passport Studio FW800 drive for storing my work when I'm on the go. I do a lot of work at Starbucks. :-) Everything is then synced back to a 2TB Studio II at home.
*
2.8GHz is just a very minor speed bump and not worth the money. I'd rather invest on an SSD. Speaking of which, OWC is offering a 240GB SSD for around 1.8k including shipping. Throw in the OptiBay for a secondary HDD would bring it to 2K. I was about to invest on that until I read about upcoming 3rd-gen SSD probably available by end of Q1 2011... Looks like I have to wait a little longer while using my current Momentus XT.
Eithanius
post Dec 12 2010, 12:10 AM

::+::KukuNius(tm)::+::
*******
Senior Member
3,952 posts

Joined: Apr 2005
From: Sector 1921B, Delta Quadrant


my plan will either be 120GB or 240GB SSD on HDD bay + 500GB HDD on OptiBay + external SuperDrive

no point having so many SSDs as my downloads will wreck the SSD sooner or later with too many rewrites...
Eithanius
post Dec 12 2010, 01:28 AM

::+::KukuNius(tm)::+::
*******
Senior Member
3,952 posts

Joined: Apr 2005
From: Sector 1921B, Delta Quadrant


QUOTE(ergo_etc @ Dec 12 2010, 12:44 AM)
Just bought myself Macbook Air, the base 3299 model. Was told by the epicenter guys that it would take 2-3 weeks to get the 4Gb version, so I just pay and left.

Now, i saw the online store says it takes only 3 days! grrrr.....
*
3 business days to ship from their factory... and probably a few more days to get to you...

QUOTE(natzakaria @ Dec 12 2010, 01:12 AM)
and of coz epicenter people are geniuses
*
If you don't understand how Apple and it's resellers work, just shut up ok...? whistling.gif
Eithanius
post Dec 12 2010, 12:12 PM

::+::KukuNius(tm)::+::
*******
Senior Member
3,952 posts

Joined: Apr 2005
From: Sector 1921B, Delta Quadrant


QUOTE(natzakaria @ Dec 12 2010, 08:35 AM)
and that is NOT 3 weeks right as quoted by the epicenter geniuses
so Eithanius I suggest YOU shut you trap since your level of knowledge is at par with those morons
*
can you quote me which part says not 3 weeks...?

and read cRazYee's post again ok... then shut the f*** up... because you really know nuts about how apple works...

This post has been edited by Eithanius: Dec 12 2010, 12:14 PM

Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0475sec    0.72    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 1st December 2025 - 01:40 PM