QUOTE(FidelisGVR @ Aug 13 2010, 06:06 PM)
I actually spend 10 minutes thinking what to reply here.. 
Actually, both Razer and SS are rock-solid gaming eqs. But, having owned gears from both sides i have to say, 60% of my purchase probability lies with Razer.
Why? They got bling bling mang..
For me, i always feel like i'm buying something more than just a gear with Razer.
EDIT: think of it this way, if you will.
SS = German cars. Purpose built, high performance.
Razer = Lamborghini. They've got the looks that matches the performance.
Well what's the use of looks when the performance fails? It's like the same argument: what's the use of graphics when gameplay sucks? IMO both SS and Razer have lousy quality control.Actually, both Razer and SS are rock-solid gaming eqs. But, having owned gears from both sides i have to say, 60% of my purchase probability lies with Razer.
Why? They got bling bling mang..
For me, i always feel like i'm buying something more than just a gear with Razer.
EDIT: think of it this way, if you will.
SS = German cars. Purpose built, high performance.
Razer = Lamborghini. They've got the looks that matches the performance.
Aug 13 2010, 07:46 PM

Quote
0.0174sec
0.73
7 queries
GZIP Disabled