QUOTE(intoxicat @ Apr 4 2017, 09:42 AM)
I am afraid you miss the issue here, whether the property does well or otherwise in an integrated development is not the issue here.
The issue is, when you have charged a purchaser premium on the selling price due to the future incorporation of a mall, but subsequently renege in delivering this promise.
Perhaps, to make you understand the issue better, BBCC is being sold today with Mitsui Fudosan managing their mall and TRX with Lend Lease managing their mall. Purchasers of either project, have expectations that their properties would be easily rented out due to presence of footfall. How would these purchasers felt, if the mall that was promised is to be deferred indefinitely after VP?
We were based here at Icon City for a few months and based on our conversations with the many buyers they bought in the property here due to the connectivity and infrastructure (the many access ramps) and the concepts such as the Gourmet Street stratified retail lots (which is not a mall) and the urban park. Many prospect tenants would love to see the park as the other side offers less desirable view or highway. A well known property guru almost bought into the Gourmet Street too.
In fact some didn't even know there was a shopping mall here, unless perhaps the much much later buyers.
In terms of pricing, I feel that it's on the high side judging by the surrounding demographics and the location itself. There are many other issues pertaining to the infrastructure of the roads too (not all ramps will be done in Phase 1). It is also not easily "connected" to Bandar Sunway, if that would happen, then we would have many student prospect tenants.
We have assisted to close a few rental deals here but due to our internal issues I am no longer able to continue my business here.
This post has been edited by accetera: Apr 4 2017, 10:07 AM