Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Yes YTL WIMAX - Yes 4G

views
     
oumind
post Aug 30 2010, 09:54 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
388 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
From: lrtwey
QUOTE(JinXXX @ Aug 22 2010, 06:02 PM)
so when launching ? can pakai one or.. don wan later become another p1 which over promote and cannot deliver shit
*
Broadband service is a capital intensive biz. monkeyking, if you want to make a difference in MY broadband industry, suggest to your big boss to form a consortium with Digi, izzi and P1 to run a shared broadband backend infrastructure
oumind
post Nov 5 2010, 08:53 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
388 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
From: lrtwey
QUOTE(ronn77 @ Nov 5 2010, 08:37 AM)
you guys are comparing the existing lousy P1 with the new players from YTLE. If you know this company well, they will not roll out something which they do not have the confidence in. YTL is already proven to be the brand that you can trust as all the projects they bring out will be a quality one, unlike some company that give empty promises without caring their company goodwill. They will get my subscription for sure due to it's own branding, unlike TM or Unifi which is doomed to fail in the future as you're getting half of what you're paying.
*
Mr. Lee, please train your forumers. This is too obvious !
oumind
post Nov 6 2010, 11:30 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
388 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
From: lrtwey
QUOTE(g5sim @ Nov 6 2010, 10:47 AM)
for those who blame 'net hoggers' for the state of the internet service, i just want to tell you all that stop is the be smart. When TMNut. Celcom.Digi.Umobile.P1 etc sale market a a 4MB download broadband product, 100% customers who pay for the services should get maximum 4MB download for everything, 24x7 p0rn download included. the problem is not the 'net hoggers' when some users dont get 4MB as they pay for, its the service providers and the policy makers that they pay in the parliament to turn a blind eye on this. So dont be stupid by blaming other internet users. Your money do not go to them. you money go to the bank account of the service providers. Get them and again dont be stupid by blaming other users. get the policy maker that you vote into office to push for 90% average consistent market speed policy (which mean, if a service policy market and sale a 2MB broadband, 100% of the subcribers should get consistent average of minimum 90% (1.8MB) every milisecond for the entire duration of service for all type of usage - p2p sharing included. Its a pipe dream? If its a pipe dream and the service providers should be jailed for "fraud".
*
TIME broadband is asking subscribers to pay more.

Price of TIME 1.5Mbps plan is RM128 per month. TIME is good in providing consistent retail broadband service based on my experience.

Price of Streamyx 1Mbps plan is RM88-RM99 per month

Basically subscribers (as a group) have to pay what they get. The question is who pay more relative to usage?
Streamyx model - everyone shares the cost. Price is relatively lower. This works as long as heavy users are kept in certain percentage.
TIME model - everyone pays premium price. Price is relatively higher but you use whatever you subscribe



oumind
post Nov 21 2010, 02:29 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
388 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
From: lrtwey
QUOTE(wiind @ Nov 21 2010, 02:14 PM)
@monkeyking u sounds like a YES spokesperson  icon_idea.gif
*
Kudos must be given to monkeyking for turning a few info threads to PR campaigns. More interesting is mods allow these threads to 'survive'.


To all ISPs and telcos, if you deliver a superior service to your target markets, all these techniques are superfluous because Malaysia-based broadband subscribers are still looking for their ideal ISPs. Those who are willing to pay premium price already found their 'solutions'. Others are still searching better deals.

Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0456sec    0.44    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 7th December 2025 - 02:26 AM