my unifi at ttdi area down since last thursday!!! >.< anyone else with the same prob?
Unifi Official TM UniFi High Speed Broadbrand Thread V6, News: RM200 for installation after Sept
Unifi Official TM UniFi High Speed Broadbrand Thread V6, News: RM200 for installation after Sept
|
|
Aug 9 2010, 10:01 AM
|
![]()
Junior Member
34 posts Joined: Jan 2007 |
my unifi at ttdi area down since last thursday!!! >.< anyone else with the same prob?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 9 2010, 10:02 AM
|
|
Elite
195 posts Joined: Sep 2006 |
QUOTE(xmascat @ Aug 9 2010, 10:01 AM) I'm under TTDI but mines running well. It's been running fine without any downtime since April actually, lol. Is your VOIP phone or IPTV working?This post has been edited by rizvanrp: Aug 9 2010, 10:03 AM |
|
|
Aug 9 2010, 10:22 AM
|
![]()
Junior Member
49 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(rizvanrp @ Aug 9 2010, 05:34 AM) Full dd-wrt flashing + configuration guide for the TM DIR-615 G1 and Unifi is up -- http://unifi.athena.my/index.php?option=co...id=53&Itemid=65 Bro even when I changed my WAN Port Assignment to vlan1.500 (I'm using Linksys WRT54GS v4.0) still the same I cant seem to connect to unifi. When i telnet to the DDWRT's console I can see that the TX of vlan1.500 got activity but there is nothing on the RX. Meaning it cant seem to detect the tagged traffic. this is my VLAN configuration for port assignment. (vlan0 = LAN, vlan1 = WAN, vlan2 = IPTV) nvram set vlan0ports="0 1 4 5*" nvram set vlan1ports="3 5" nvram set vlan2ports="2 5" nvram set port0vlans="0 18 19" nvram set port1vlans="0 18 19" nvram set port2vlans="2 18 19" nvram set port3vlans="1 18 19" nvram set port4vlans="0 18 19" nvram set vlan2hwname=vlan2 nvram commit reboot btw, do i need to enable tagging on my WAN port? nvram set vlan1ports="3 5" to nvram set vlan1ports="3t 5" This post has been edited by babybee: Aug 9 2010, 10:23 AM |
|
|
Aug 9 2010, 10:25 AM
|
![]()
Junior Member
34 posts Joined: Jan 2007 |
QUOTE(rizvanrp @ Aug 9 2010, 10:02 AM) I'm under TTDI but mines running well. It's been running fine without any downtime since April actually, lol. Is your VOIP phone or IPTV working? |
|
|
Aug 9 2010, 10:58 AM
|
|
Elite
195 posts Joined: Sep 2006 |
QUOTE(babybee @ Aug 9 2010, 10:22 AM) Bro even when I changed my WAN Port Assignment to vlan1.500 (I'm using Linksys WRT54GS v4.0) still the same I cant seem to connect to unifi. Hey babybee, I can't be 100% certain what's going on with your unit unless I take a packet capture of the traffic between the BTU <---> Linksys. However, based on what you're telling me it seems the case is either :When i telnet to the DDWRT's console I can see that the TX of vlan1.500 got activity but there is nothing on the RX. Meaning it cant seem to detect the tagged traffic. this is my VLAN configuration for port assignment. (vlan0 = LAN, vlan1 = WAN, vlan2 = IPTV) nvram set vlan0ports="0 1 4 5*" nvram set vlan1ports="3 5" nvram set vlan2ports="2 5" nvram set port0vlans="0 18 19" nvram set port1vlans="0 18 19" nvram set port2vlans="2 18 19" nvram set port3vlans="1 18 19" nvram set port4vlans="0 18 19" nvram set vlan2hwname=vlan2 nvram commit reboot btw, do i need to enable tagging on my WAN port? nvram set vlan1ports="3 5" to nvram set vlan1ports="3t 5" 1. Your Linksys is sending out untagged traffic on vlan1 despite you setting the WAN port assignment (hence no response) 2. You've selected the wrong port, vlan1 is not your WAN port and tagged traffic is being sent out on something which is not connected to the BTU The reason I say this is because should the BTU side have received any vlan 500 tagged traffic at all, you would have received at least a single ethernet frame (couple o' bytes) as an acknowledgment to your initial PPPoE broadcast. Perhaps you can try creating a bridge (br0) and adding all three vlans in (vlan0,vlan1,vlan2).. then set VLAN tag 500 on br0. After that, use br0.500 as your WAN port assignment and see if it can dial in? I would also try to eliminate the possible problems here so its best that while you're attempting to get PPPoE running.. don't set any port based vlans. This post has been edited by rizvanrp: Aug 9 2010, 11:00 AM |
|
|
Aug 9 2010, 11:02 AM
|
![]()
Junior Member
49 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(rizvanrp @ Aug 9 2010, 10:58 AM) Hey babybee, I can't be 100% certain what's going on with your unit unless I take a packet capture of the traffic between the BTU <---> Linksys. However, based on what you're telling me it seems the case is either : yup its confirmed that vlan1 is my WAN. because when i set back my WAN port assignment to vlan1 not vlan1.500 it will dial up perfectly.... but if i use vlan1 i have to use the DIR615 as the vlan switch. but if i use the vlan1.500 and plug in directly to the BTU it wont work. 1. Your Linksys is sending out untagged traffic on vlan1 despite you setting the WAN port assignment (hence no response) 2. You've selected the wrong port, vlan1 is not your WAN port and tagged traffic is being sent out on something which is not connected to the BTU Perhaps you can try creating a bridge (br0) and adding all three vlans in (vlan0,vlan1,vlan2).. then set VLAN tag 500 on br0. After that, use br0.500 as your WAN port assignment and see if it can dial in? I would also try to eliminate the possible problems here so its best that while you're attempting to get PPPoE running.. don't set any port based vlans. will try the bridging method and see, but i dont see how creating a br2.500 will work... |
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 9 2010, 11:04 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
111 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Selangor |
Did anyone have a list of modem that had been verify that it is working for Unifi?
|
|
|
Aug 9 2010, 11:08 AM
|
![]()
Junior Member
49 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Aug 9 2010, 11:09 AM
|
|
Elite
195 posts Joined: Sep 2006 |
QUOTE(babybee @ Aug 9 2010, 11:02 AM) yup its confirmed that vlan1 is my WAN. because when i set back my WAN port assignment to vlan1 not vlan1.500 it will dial up perfectly.... but if i use vlan1 i have to use the DIR615 as the vlan switch. but if i use the vlan1.500 and plug in directly to the BTU it wont work. Another LYNer here who uses dd-wrt with Unifi (rogue I think) set his WAN port to a bridge interface to get it to work so I'm guessing it can connect through that (as long as all your interfaces are in the same bridge). A while ago when I was writing my Unifi VLAN forwarder, I basically had to analyze PPPoE auth packet captures for 4 hours straight because my application had to rewrite source/dest MAC addresses as well as add a 4 byte VLAN tag after those MACs.. I pretty much know how the BTU will respond to spoofed PPPoE packets so based on that knowledge I'm making those two guesses above.will try the bridging method and see, but i dont see how creating a br2.500 will work... But yeah, I can't be sure of anything until I see an actual packet capture. Hacked hardware like dd-wrt does not always function the way we assume it does :/ If you send a valid PPPoE discovery request but it has no VLAN tag on it, the BTU will ignore it. If you send a valid PPPoE discovery request with a VLAN tag, you will get an acknowledgment from the BTU side. If you send a PPPoE discovery request with the VLAN tag but with an invalid source MAC address, you will get an ack but your session will not progress from there This post has been edited by rizvanrp: Aug 9 2010, 11:12 AM |
|
|
Aug 9 2010, 11:11 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,008 posts Joined: Sep 2005 From: T.T.D.I, Bukit Damansara |
|
|
|
Aug 9 2010, 11:13 AM
|
![]()
Junior Member
49 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(rizvanrp @ Aug 9 2010, 11:09 AM) Another LYNer here who uses dd-wrt with Unifi (rogue I think) set his WAN port to a bridge interface to get it to work so I'm guessing it can connect through that (as long as all your interfaces are in the same bridge). A while ago when I was writing my Unifi VLAN forwarder, I basically had to analyze PPPoE auth packet captures for 4 hours straight because my application had to rewrite source/dest MAC addresses as well as add a 4 byte VLAN tag after those MACs.. I pretty much know how the BTU will respond to spoofed PPPoE packets so based on that knowledge I'm making those two guesses above. i will to use a TAP device and perform a packet capture between the BTU and the DDWRT router later at night... But yeah, I can't be sure of anything until I see an actual packet capture. Hacked hardware like dd-wrt does not always function the way we assume it does :/ will pass you the results once i obtain it... |
|
|
Aug 9 2010, 11:15 AM
|
|
Elite
8,401 posts Joined: Jul 2008 |
@rizzy
Actually how the VLAN tagging interface looks like, just found that my modem also have the function, I dun have unifi but just to help people, but I can see TM are planting the cable in my area ![]() |
|
|
Aug 9 2010, 11:16 AM
|
|
Elite
195 posts Joined: Sep 2006 |
QUOTE(babybee @ Aug 9 2010, 11:13 AM) i will to use a TAP device and perform a packet capture between the BTU and the DDWRT router later at night... W'okay but its easier to use an old hub (which mirrors traffic to each port) or a managed switch with port mirroring will pass you the results once i obtain it... Added on August 9, 2010, 11:18 am QUOTE(blacktubi @ Aug 9 2010, 11:15 AM) @rizzy This is an ADSL2 modem+router combination right? I'm just guessing because it has ATM VC based PVIDsActually how the VLAN tagging interface looks like, just found that my modem also have the function, I dun have unifi but just to help people, but I can see TM are planting the cable in my area ![]() Edit : doh, just saw the ADSL thing up there haha This can only be used with DSL providers which send certain services over VLANs.. can't be used with Unifi. This post has been edited by rizvanrp: Aug 9 2010, 11:18 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 9 2010, 11:19 AM
|
|
Elite
8,401 posts Joined: Jul 2008 |
QUOTE(rizvanrp @ Aug 9 2010, 11:16 AM) W'okay but its easier to use an old hub (which mirrors traffic to each port) or a managed switch with port mirroring This is a all in one router... ADSL, Wifi + Ethernet routerAdded on August 9, 2010, 11:18 am This is an ADSL2 modem+router combination right? I'm just guessing because it has ATM VC based PVIDs |
|
|
Aug 9 2010, 11:19 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
111 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Selangor |
|
|
|
Aug 9 2010, 11:21 AM
|
![]()
Junior Member
49 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(rizvanrp @ Aug 9 2010, 11:16 AM) W'okay but its easier to use an old hub (which mirrors traffic to each port) or a managed switch with port mirroring old hub xda la... donated mine a very long time ago... i will be using backtrack to capture the traffic...Added on August 9, 2010, 11:18 am This is an ADSL2 modem+router combination right? I'm just guessing because it has ATM VC based PVIDs Edit : doh, just saw the ADSL thing up there haha This can only be used with DSL providers which send certain services over VLANs.. can't be used with Unifi. |
|
|
Aug 9 2010, 11:22 AM
|
|
Elite
195 posts Joined: Sep 2006 |
QUOTE(blacktubi @ Aug 9 2010, 11:19 AM) Its only for ADSL based services AFAIK. Like a service provider will be able to do what Unifi does (separate VOIP/Internet/Video) but within an ATM link instead. A VLAN tag is just a 4 byte array of data anyway.. although to you guys it's probably the most annoying 4 byte string since it prevents you from using your own hardware with Unifi QUOTE(babybee @ Aug 9 2010, 11:21 AM) old hub xda la... donated mine a very long time ago... i will be using backtrack to capture the traffic... Backtrack will be fine |
|
|
Aug 9 2010, 11:31 AM
|
![]()
Junior Member
49 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(rizvanrp @ Aug 9 2010, 11:22 AM) Its only for ADSL based services AFAIK. Like a service provider will be able to do what Unifi does (separate VOIP/Internet/Video) but within an ATM link instead. A VLAN tag is just a 4 byte array of data anyway.. although to you guys it's probably the most annoying 4 byte string since it prevents you from using your own hardware with Unifi is the asus rt-n16 a broadcom chipset also? i need to upgrade my WRT54GS soon... its quite aged... haha...Backtrack will be fine |
|
|
Aug 9 2010, 12:49 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
60 posts Joined: Aug 2005 |
i got my UniFi this morning. Speed test result.
![]() I run speed test again. ![]() This post has been edited by vampire: Aug 9 2010, 02:37 PM |
|
|
Aug 9 2010, 12:53 PM
|
![]()
Junior Member
49 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.1110sec
0.28
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 2nd December 2025 - 09:12 AM |