QUOTE(klseet @ Aug 15 2010, 01:32 PM)
Alamak, sound negative news on Broadcom chipset
It's strange, some LYN dd-wrt forumer did recommend Broadcom base, but no response on how to do it:
http://forum.lowyat.net/index.php?act=ST&f...0#entry35317179What about Ralink or Atheros?
I have both WHR-G300N and WHR-HP-G300N, now able to connect internet through:
WHR-G300N Ralink on VLAN2.500
WHR-HP-G300N Atheros on eth0.500
May I know how to setup or "hardcode" command to make vlan2.600 [Ralink] & eth0.600 [Anthros] and map to LAN4?
I'm willing to do any testing even risk of bricking it, I really just want to replace that DIR-615, with such low quality & unreliable product, I can't imagine what will happen after 1 year ....
Appreciate your further advise/guidance here!

Ralink and Atheros can support PPPoE over VLAN interface fine but Broadcom doesn't. Port mapping (or port based VLANs) depends on whether your router can support it in the first place. It's two different issues and it's very hard to find a single router model that can do both of these things at once with dd-wrt. If you really need IPTV, just go with a VLAN switch.
Last night, pr0di9y and I were testing out possible BTU bridging for the Huawei Echolife 850 but in the end I gave up because it simply will not support it. I managed to extract all the passwords from the unit + get full console access (priv exec mode) but no dice

At most, the Huawei can start and handle a PPPoE connection for you but it doesn't seem to be able to bridge the VLAN with a physical port as far as I can tell.
QUOTE(d60x @ Aug 15 2010, 01:33 PM)
Well, my failing dlink has been replaced by TM this morning. Called them last Friday complaining about the unstable dlink, this morning 2 nice chap from TM turn up, and quickly replace the dlink. According to them they are many issues with this router and TM is seeking a quick solution. After 2 hours of heavy used, seems ok so far. I must commend the friendly and helpful attitude of their technicians, its not their fault but TM as a corp.
The moment Unifi launched and we realized they 'locked' us in with this router, everyone already knew this was going to happen :/ I personally blame TM for not giving a damn about functionality and focusing on profitability. BTUs are totally unlocked, anyone can just log in and grab your SIP user/pass through the VOIP network. Same case with the DIR-615. Not to mention the build quality of the hardware which seems to be dropping to the point that even they have to acknowledge that it's a problem.
And now they want to get a new router model to fix this? Just give out new BTUs which strip off all the VLAN tagging once the data is out of the VDSL/Fiber. Let us use our own damn hardware with the service we're paying for.