QUOTE(lost123 @ Nov 18 2010, 02:35 AM)
haha.. sgs not as bad as u say la..
i would say the only thing bad about the SGS is their software implementation.. in terms of hardware, they lead the pack (besides build and flash).
SGS with custom rom and lagfix is fantastic!
who's implement ??..samsung???..
why need lag fix n custom rom??..bcoz of sgs sucks rite...

..just admit terrible lag with stock rom..

Added on November 18, 2010, 2:03 amsamsung should learn build the gud software..baru la matching dgn hardware..haha
Added on November 18, 2010, 2:30 ami like to quote this from others otai forumers...act. a lot things i learn from uncle benny..uncle..u rowk!!..
QUOTE(benny888 @ Nov 16 2010, 12:25 AM)
Cos I want a bigger screen ; so used to the 4.3 of HD2 thought the 4" Galaxy S will be better. Now I am using 5" Dell Streak and I love it though it is not so responsive as the Nexus but is miles ahead better than the Galaxy S.
The only great thing I find about the Galaxy S is the beautiful S Amoled display. Other than that the rest is mediocre - slow launch of programs, miserable file access taking up to 3 to 5 secs, hopeless and unreliable GPS . Have tried to convince myself to keep it updating with lag fix solutions, even Froyo roms etc but still disappointing; any gains were marginal. My unit came with the 3 buttons disabled ( meaning unable to go direct to download mode ) a great inconvenience when comes to flashing roms. Even my HD2 on Android performs better than it
This post has been edited by khalpowers: Nov 18 2010, 02:30 AM