Jun 15 2011, 11:29 PM
QUOTE(justincase @ Jun 15 2011, 04:49 PM)
Many buyers here are so selfish!
Read many comments that you all have paid for the condo...but not the indian people living there.
They have their rights as a citizen too! So what if you have voted in PR, they have to be fair to all, not just people with money.
You have money, you still have a choice. Some people are so poor and physically immobile and you people still have the heart to blame them.
Now what you should do is get the Developer to settle the problem! Demo at the developer's office. Your money is paid to the developer not the state gov.
Now very obvious the developer is using buyers to pressure the gov over problems on their end. Read up reports over the media and find out from the gov why they took this action then you all will understand!
i beg to differRead many comments that you all have paid for the condo...but not the indian people living there.
They have their rights as a citizen too! So what if you have voted in PR, they have to be fair to all, not just people with money.
You have money, you still have a choice. Some people are so poor and physically immobile and you people still have the heart to blame them.
Now what you should do is get the Developer to settle the problem! Demo at the developer's office. Your money is paid to the developer not the state gov.
Now very obvious the developer is using buyers to pressure the gov over problems on their end. Read up reports over the media and find out from the gov why they took this action then you all will understand!
if you have a numbers of squatters vs the number which have abandoned condo
1 - condo have even higher impact
2 - if peter need money, they ask from the bank
the loan is 1120 purchasers to pay & without a house
what i mean here is the gravity of the problem is different
This post has been edited by AbangCorp: Jun 15 2011, 11:30 PM
Quote
0.0290sec
0.15
7 queries
GZIP Disabled