what qualifies as street photography in here? as long as it's being shot at a street?

do you feel that you spend more time looking at the dot than looking at the viewfinder?
that is what i felt and that is why i sold all my manual lenses.

i find that i was spending more time in looking at the dot which i am not supposed to.
i am suppose to be looking at the view and ready to capture the scene

i have no problem with the hair chopped off.
i have more problem with what this photo is trying to tell me. there is no message/story behind it.
the expression of the guy seems interesting to catch my attention but the background is too blur (a fan of 1.4 lens?) and there is not enough information to tell me what is happening.

that is the place to train... hahaa
loads of art students went there to do their assignment back in the 90s with their film camera.

now? the vendors are even more camera immune as digital cameras are so widely used by the public

nothing to be afraid of

why do you say so?

why wanna bring 2 50mm lens?

rx330,
are you there for an assignment?

rx330,
what rollei do you have arr? is it a TLR?

yerr, i dislike it because need to look at the numbers at the back... but a rolleiflex is too expensive nowadays it's not really worth it

rx330,
when you need to advance the film, you have to turn the nob and stop when the film number show the next number. those numbers.

but do becareful when you are carrying 3 cameras with you. if i were you, i will just bring one camera. i do not want to be too busy taking photographs. i would prefer to experience bangkok...

rx330,
the rangefinders you are having are fantastic. why need other cameras?

ohh this is fantastic, naimaD