Aug 17 2010, 11:28 PM
QUOTE(3dassets @ Jul 9 2010, 02:35 AM)
I read about natural selection long time ago that the White people "Neanderthal" are more advanced in gene compared to others "Peking man" and black "African / aborigine" are the most primitive in scientific terms; each of their children can have different colour hair & eyes is the visible fact and their physical build are bigger.
The African look the same, facial features that resembled to the gorilla (no offence) we don't need high education to notice, this is the result of in-breeding.
WHITE are more superior because their culture successfully transfered knowledge through documentation and the first to derive the many systems that govern a society, ask yourself who gave us the education content in our school? The Western civilization other than history even the calendar.
We can't deny the fact however educated we become, in fact, if you look at the map and take African and mix with Chinese, you get brown in the middle and if you ever come across "Chinese-Indian" they look like the Malay. Most of us do think that WHITE or Caucasian do look better and most of the local advertisements prefer Chinese and skin whitening products are top selling cosmetic.
Why Asian can't win the world cup? Blame it on the short gene.
Are you sure about that? From what I know, Neanderthals and Peking men are dead-ends in the evolution from homo erectus. Homo sapiens are the successful descendants of homo erectus, and all humans today are classified as homo sapiens. Africans are also homo sapiens. As long as they can mate with other humans and produce healthy children, then they are the same species. Interbred species usually produce offsprings that are infertile. Mating Africans with any other human produces fertile children.The African look the same, facial features that resembled to the gorilla (no offence) we don't need high education to notice, this is the result of in-breeding.
WHITE are more superior because their culture successfully transfered knowledge through documentation and the first to derive the many systems that govern a society, ask yourself who gave us the education content in our school? The Western civilization other than history even the calendar.
We can't deny the fact however educated we become, in fact, if you look at the map and take African and mix with Chinese, you get brown in the middle and if you ever come across "Chinese-Indian" they look like the Malay. Most of us do think that WHITE or Caucasian do look better and most of the local advertisements prefer Chinese and skin whitening products are top selling cosmetic.
Why Asian can't win the world cup? Blame it on the short gene.
Caucasians are taller in general now because of better nutrition. A survey of their height from two thousand years ago showed that it oscillated depending on the nutrition available at that time. Some times, the average was only 5' 3" and other times, almost 6'. Link Measurements made from ancient Chinese armour showed that many of the people were above 6' at certain points in times, especially during the peak of the dynasties. Ancient Romans described ancient Chinese as tall people. If you look at the Japanese, the younger generation is the tallest in Asia and have heights comparable to the average mediterranean European. In the past, just 1 or 2 generations ago, they were widely considered to be shorties.
Having different colour eyes has nothing to do with genetic superiority. Those are probably mutated genes that have survived, since brown eyes are the norm for most of the world. Same with the hair. Link
What do you mean by their culture successfully transferred knowledge through documentation? Many civilisations invented writing, maybe on their own and successfully transferred knowledge throughout the ages. Education content in school? Maybe what we learn now has a lot to do with the West, but the West expanded a lot on the work done by other cultures and civilisations before them that came into decline. One of the reasons the West is so dominant now is because they expanded a lot and dominated other civilisations over the last few hundred years. Maybe you can claim that being aggressive and claiming to want to spread "civilisation" to be a cultural superiority, but then many aggressive cultures have failed after initial successes.
Why Asians can't win the world cup? Poverty, lack of infrastructure, lack of good coaching from a young age, focus on education instead of sports, etc. Lots of factors to consider.
Here's the average height of the teams in the last world cup. As you can see, the 2 finalists are shorter than the Koreans on average, and only slightly taller than the Japanese and N. Koreans.
QUOTE
Average height
Serbia are the tallest team, followed by Greece and Denmark. I never knew Greeks are this tall. Chile are the shortest team, with Korea DPR and South Africa the other two teams below 178 cm.
1 Serbia 185.957
2 Greece 185.261
3 Denmark 184.87
4 New Zealand 184.739
5 Germany 184.478
6 Nigeria 184.087
7 Slovakia 184.043
8 Slovenia 183.87
9 Australia 183.783
10 Switzerland 183.261
11 Cameroon 182.652
12 Brazil 182.609
13 Korea Republic 182.478
14 Algeria 182.174
15 France 181.957
16 England 181.739
17 Portugal 181.478
18 Italy 181.261
19 Netherlands 181.087
20 USA 181.087
21 Côte d'Ivoire 180.957
22 Paraguay 180.913
23 Spain 180.913
24 Uruguay 180.522
25 Japan 178.783
26 Ghana 178.435
27 Argentina 178.043
28 Honduras 178
29 Mexico 178
30 South Africa 177.913
31 Korea DPR 177.739
32 Chile 176.478
Looking only at the first 11 (going by shirt numbers):
1 Greece 186.273
2 New Zealand 186.091
3 Germany 185.364
4 Denmark 185.273
5 Nigeria 185.182
6 Slovenia 184.818
7 Switzerland 184.818
8 Australia 184.545
9 Serbia 183.364
10 Slovakia 182.818
11 Algeria 182.727
12 England 182.727
13 Brazil 182.636
14 Uruguay 182.545
15 Netherlands 181.364
16 Italy 181.273
17 Korea Republic 181.273
18 France 181.091
19 Portugal 180.545
20 Paraguay 180.455
21 USA 180.273
22 Cameroon 180
23 Ghana 180
24 Honduras 179.636
25 Spain 179.636
26 Côte d'Ivoire 179
27 Argentina 178.364
28 Mexico 177.727
29 Chile 176.909
30 Japan 176.818
31 Korea DPR 176.364
32 South Africa 176.182
Serbia are the tallest team, followed by Greece and Denmark. I never knew Greeks are this tall. Chile are the shortest team, with Korea DPR and South Africa the other two teams below 178 cm.
1 Serbia 185.957
2 Greece 185.261
3 Denmark 184.87
4 New Zealand 184.739
5 Germany 184.478
6 Nigeria 184.087
7 Slovakia 184.043
8 Slovenia 183.87
9 Australia 183.783
10 Switzerland 183.261
11 Cameroon 182.652
12 Brazil 182.609
13 Korea Republic 182.478
14 Algeria 182.174
15 France 181.957
16 England 181.739
17 Portugal 181.478
18 Italy 181.261
19 Netherlands 181.087
20 USA 181.087
21 Côte d'Ivoire 180.957
22 Paraguay 180.913
23 Spain 180.913
24 Uruguay 180.522
25 Japan 178.783
26 Ghana 178.435
27 Argentina 178.043
28 Honduras 178
29 Mexico 178
30 South Africa 177.913
31 Korea DPR 177.739
32 Chile 176.478
Looking only at the first 11 (going by shirt numbers):
1 Greece 186.273
2 New Zealand 186.091
3 Germany 185.364
4 Denmark 185.273
5 Nigeria 185.182
6 Slovenia 184.818
7 Switzerland 184.818
8 Australia 184.545
9 Serbia 183.364
10 Slovakia 182.818
11 Algeria 182.727
12 England 182.727
13 Brazil 182.636
14 Uruguay 182.545
15 Netherlands 181.364
16 Italy 181.273
17 Korea Republic 181.273
18 France 181.091
19 Portugal 180.545
20 Paraguay 180.455
21 USA 180.273
22 Cameroon 180
23 Ghana 180
24 Honduras 179.636
25 Spain 179.636
26 Côte d'Ivoire 179
27 Argentina 178.364
28 Mexico 177.727
29 Chile 176.909
30 Japan 176.818
31 Korea DPR 176.364
32 South Africa 176.182
This post has been edited by thesoothsayer: Aug 17 2010, 11:31 PM
Quote
0.0165sec
0.24
6 queries
GZIP Disabled