if im not mistaken,the cover ur looking for is think tank hydrophobia..here are the links..

http://www.thinktankphoto.com/categories/c...ain-covers.aspx

Hoit..kasi upload big size of my picture...
small2 size aje lah... kamon2,u know u want it..faster2 and get a VR2 la..

gambar kak nurul tu u need to bump some saturation la bro..da mcm hantu pulak skin tone die..btw,ok what the outcome for our DIY white screen with kain kapan..

side note : izit me alone,or kak nurul sister tu mcm photostat copy or her?/..

super side note : picture of me showing my boxer tu jgn post mane2 pulak tau..

---

Added on July 20, 2010, 9:53 amnormal la..back in the film day, f/0.95 lens is quite abundant. now u can still found it bundle up together with used film camera on sale in Photomalaysia

This post has been edited by zackskate666: Jul 20 2010, 09:53 AM

no need to use filter for ur 50mm f1.8 lah..summore a UV filter isnt useful at all bcoz our camera already have built in UV canceler..for protection,no need la oso,its just a rm350++ lens...a cheap filter will only make ur picture quality degradable.

dont worry..slowly,with every mistake,there will be a window of improvement..keep testing with PP and more shots..

hear that ise,somebody requesting moar picture of your girl..come faster we do photoshoot with your girl la..what say you??

awal bli kas0t raye bang..org cimb mmg masyuk...

try to shoot fashion show using the 5dmkII then tell me again whether you hate d700 or not..when you've familiar+get used with the 51 focus point of the d700,after that use the clustered point of the 5dmkII,you come back to me again..5dmkII iso handling is superb,this i cant denied it..d700 cant fight with it..But in other terms,it still loses (but different people different POV)..as the raw size of 1 picture taken by 5dmkII and d700 is very-very a big different..(but this only trouble those who like to shoot raw,like myself..hehe)

as i said,depends on the shooting subject la right..shooting with 9/3 focus point,means u need to recomposed back the shots right?..try to do that during fashion show shots..but again,as i said its between the clustered focus point of the 5dmkII in the middle with the 51 points of the d700..dont compare d700 with ur d90(9) or d60(3) lah.and it varies with what type of shots ur taking.if wedding/potrait/landscape,then 5d or any other camera can do the job right..if the 5dmkII have the focus point like the 1D mkIII or like the 51 points of the nikon counterpart,then having a cheap battery grip(canon accessories tend to be more pricier than nikon..from here they make the money again) then we can get a very-very superb camera within the price of 6k-7k...but again,there's a marketing reason why they plan it to be that way,and why the PRO body have all the things the 5d/d700 lacks off..

yeah true..no need to compare between this and that..but,all those statement i've stated is based on personal experience handling and using the camera and also the picture its produce.i dont simply go to any review and directly take what is their verdict between those two..

even though in my statement i've said that the 5dmkII outshine d700 in iso handling,no way in a million years u all will see me jumping ship..nikon camera is the best in term of built,ergonomics and user friendly..really hope the d700 replacement will be something that have the similar iso handling like the d3s

that face is untouched or u already applied 77 layer of your skII?..because i see it like too soft compare with other part of the body/picture.

wah...triple layer chin..hahaha....

just comparing the weight..u didnt follow up with photo comparison between those two??..