it's unfair to compare D90 with 550D lah sayang.
different category
Photography Nikon D90 V8, Nikon mid-high range DSLR
Photography Nikon D90 V8, Nikon mid-high range DSLR
|
|
Aug 4 2010, 06:32 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,637 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
it's unfair to compare D90 with 550D lah sayang.
different category |
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 5 2010, 05:16 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,637 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Aug 5 2010, 05:28 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,637 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
joe mcnally had to buy all his equipment using his own 'hard earned' money. hahahaa
whereas for greg norman, canon practically FEDEX their latest equipments to him for free |
|
|
Aug 9 2010, 08:45 AM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,637 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(gnome @ Aug 9 2010, 01:46 AM) Ahhh icic...that explains it 35 and 50 are too similar in my opinion. just 2 steps forward or backward gets you to these 2 focal length.btw still trying to decide which prime lens to get, atm already narrow down to 3 candidate. Nikon 35mm F2, 50mm F1.4D and 85mm F1.8. Choices oh choices if you were planning to go all primes... get the 24, 50, 85 or 35, 85, 135 hehee |
|
|
Aug 14 2010, 09:25 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,637 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Aug 14 2010, 09:58 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,637 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(celciuz @ Aug 14 2010, 09:32 PM) dont use lenspen. i have this and it works like a charm peca formula multi coated lens cleaner or if you were into branded stuffs... carl zeiss i do not have experience with this though |
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 22 2010, 12:37 AM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,637 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Aug 23 2010, 08:25 AM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,637 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(zackskate666 @ Aug 23 2010, 02:47 AM) as i said,depends on the shooting subject la right..shooting with 9/3 focus point,means u need to recomposed back the shots right?..try to do that during fashion show shots..but again,as i said its between the clustered focus point of the 5dmkII in the middle with the 51 points of the d700..dont compare d700 with ur d90(9) or d60(3) lah.and it varies with what type of shots ur taking.if wedding/potrait/landscape,then 5d or any other camera can do the job right..if the 5dmkII have the focus point like the 1D mkIII or like the 51 points of the nikon counterpart,then having a cheap battery grip(canon accessories tend to be more pricier than nikon..from here they make the money again) then we can get a very-very superb camera within the price of 6k-7k...but again,there's a marketing reason why they plan it to be that way,and why the PRO body have all the things the 5d/d700 lacks off.. hmm,i think you are putting the 5D mk2 at a turf where it do not perform best. why don't you compare both cameras shooting landscape? |
|
|
Aug 24 2010, 10:53 PM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,637 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0519sec
0.26
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 16th December 2025 - 04:24 AM |