the prime95 halted..
don't worry no kaboom
AMD® Socket AM2&AM3 Overclocking V23, It has come!Bulldozer heat is around us.
AMD® Socket AM2&AM3 Overclocking V23, It has come!Bulldozer heat is around us.
|
|
Jul 5 2010, 03:22 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
8,753 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
the prime95 halted..
don't worry no kaboom |
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 6 2010, 09:37 AM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
8,753 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Jul 6 2010, 12:12 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
8,753 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
so any orientation no problem edy..
|
|
|
Jul 6 2010, 03:32 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
8,753 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(clon12 @ Jul 6 2010, 02:17 PM) Then how do i see whether mine is c3 or c2? if let say it bsoded, so i just go back to bios and change to my best settings without system failure? u can check using cpu-zEdit: I've opened my casing, change its position to my desk (photos of my casing will be uploaded soon) and ran some stress test with 3.4GHz. Temperature were better than yesterday! [/SPOILER] ![]() I think with this temp i can go around 3.6-3.8 GHz but must I keep my casing open? >< not stable just change the settings |
|
|
Jul 6 2010, 03:34 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
8,753 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
anything and the revision too..
|
|
|
Jul 7 2010, 09:43 AM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
8,753 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(-pWs- @ Jul 7 2010, 02:56 AM) the default speed is higher than 1055T?this for oem only right.. |
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 7 2010, 10:21 AM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
8,753 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
the multiplier is there.. but when set higher than default..
the multiplier stuck @ highest default setting in windows.. |
|
|
Jul 7 2010, 11:30 AM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
8,753 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
using ati gpu? i notice latest driver tend to crash..
|
|
|
Jul 7 2010, 09:51 PM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
8,753 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
aik rog can set ar..
i tried with asus 88 evo last time can set higher multiplier in bios.. but in windows just set to default |
|
|
Jul 8 2010, 01:30 PM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
8,753 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(blue16 @ Jul 8 2010, 01:13 PM) hi guys try play with ram trfc..is this OC a good one? or can improve i'm using 800mhz andi didnt use 667mhz(333mhz) to start my RAM overclocking jst start from 400mhz directly wif the timing shown in the picture i try to put down to 333mhz, but i cant exceed 260mhz cpu clock duno y i use x10 x3 ( reduce my MB temp ?! ) p/s : CPU temp jst fine, it never exceed 58'c, using CM hyper 212 + please advise ![]() |
|
|
Jul 8 2010, 04:43 PM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
8,753 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
must try first la.. no need keep asking..
now must senang kira.. 5 cents.. |
|
|
Jul 9 2010, 10:36 AM
Return to original view | Post
#12
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
8,753 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(saturn85 @ Jul 9 2010, 02:16 AM) i not sure what comment is this.. not helping any..multiplier often referred to cpu multiply to fsb.. to get cpu speed.. divider normally is for fsb:ram bus ratio.. let's think of this normal circumstances.. the ratio would be.. 1:2 where 200:400 200 = cpu fsb 400 = ram <-- this is where the ram can achieve 800mhz becoz of ddr u need to multiply to 2.. what if we raise the fsb to 290 by using that ratio (DIVIDER)? it can be.. (290 x 2)/1 = 580 thus 1160mhz.. can ur ram withstand this condition? so lower that ratio might HELP.. shall i calculate.. 200:333 what the hell is this.. how i calculate my ram if i were to raised my fsb.. 200:333 is equal to 3/5 how? 200/333 ~ 0.6 = 6/10 = 3/5 = 3:5 so if the fsb is 250 the ram speed would be (250 x 5)/3 = 417 ~ 833mhz.. and not only that.. u need to play with the voltage and the advance timings.. |
|
|
Jul 9 2010, 10:52 AM
Return to original view | Post
#13
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
8,753 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
why need that HP ram if expensive?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 9 2010, 11:17 AM
Return to original view | Post
#14
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
8,753 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
actually 1700mhz.. but not tighten it up..
i just thinking the high bandwidth ram in amd system is not helping much either.. more or less.. pay for a useless cause.. |
|
|
Jul 9 2010, 11:21 AM
Return to original view | Post
#15
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
8,753 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
gskill not stated any.. i think relabeled.. just noticed D3 in the glance..
and again it's small chip.. might be good on temp also.. |
|
|
Jul 9 2010, 11:49 AM
Return to original view | Post
#16
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
8,753 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Jul 9 2010, 12:14 PM
Return to original view | Post
#17
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
8,753 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(saturn85 @ Jul 9 2010, 11:55 AM) sorry bro. no offence..i just mean no need care about the motherboard is using multiplier concept or divider concept. although their implementation are different, but they will give same result. just like: base clock x dram multiplier = dram clock 200 x 2 = 400mhz base clock / dram divider = dram clock 200 / (1/2) = 400mhz and the multiplier or divider, usually will be in ratio form, that is: base clock : dram clock = 1:2 i donno where u get that ram multiplier.. what about other ratio? i'm sure it's derived from the fsb:ram ratio.. it's actually 1:2 not just multiply by 2.. just that the answer is correct because it was divided by 1.. normally we refer the multiplier to the cpu.. |
|
|
Jul 9 2010, 02:33 PM
Return to original view | Post
#18
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
8,753 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
don't worry.. oc just for fun not a must..
just that learning in the correct way will yields better result.. after sometimes we know what to understand.. it takes times.. |
|
|
Jul 9 2010, 03:18 PM
Return to original view | Post
#19
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
8,753 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(saturn85 @ Jul 9 2010, 12:32 PM) newer amd phenom architecture using dram multilplier. some board have 1,2,3,4,5,6 or what ever should refer to..older amd athlon architecture using dram divider. 1- 400 (1:1) 2- 667 (3:5) 3- 800 (1:2) 4- 1066 (3:8) 5- 1333 (3:10) 6- 1600 (1:4) what ever it is... it's still came from that fraction.. 1- 1 2- 1.67 3- 2 4- 2.67 5- 3.33 6- 4 crazy jargon same like fsb and htt.. so just multiply that value with fsb will get the ram speed (don't forget to multiply by 2 for ddr) easier isn't it.. but lost the concept.. Added on July 9, 2010, 3:18 pm QUOTE(-pWs- @ Jul 9 2010, 03:08 PM) for u is the must X6.. if not i baling boom.. This post has been edited by 8tvt: Jul 9 2010, 03:18 PM |
|
|
Jul 9 2010, 04:49 PM
Return to original view | Post
#20
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
8,753 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
is 9.5 cannot?
|
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0554sec
0.51
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 29th November 2025 - 02:56 PM |