QUOTE(MNet @ Jan 16 2011, 10:52 AM)
Haha
How about like this.
Initial car price is 100k but car dealer want to "support" your idea of islamic banking.
Car dealer rise the car price to 130k.
Then car dealer reduce the car price to 110k to islamic bank.
End up car buyer loss in this case.
If the car company intentionally wants to increase their price due to the implementation of the 0% interest rate offered, the islamic bank has the right not to purchase from them. The bank can tell their client that the car company has increased the price of the car but however it is up to the client. The car company wants to cheat the bank is not the problem of the bank as long as the bank does not cheat their clients.
In your case, I could only see that the car company is cheating. Not the bank nor Mr. A
Added on January 16, 2011, 6:21 pmQUOTE(Fall guy @ Jan 16 2011, 04:07 PM)
Whatever amount that has to be paid back is quite the same for conventional or islamic banking.
This is the proof that all so called Islamic bank is not Islamic.
Added on January 16, 2011, 6:26 pmQUOTE(deodorant @ Jan 16 2011, 05:19 PM)
no difference from normal loan. the title is still in my name (and not the bank's name). of course, even with conventional loan you never really "own" the house until you've finished paying, cos if you stop paying the bank will repossess it

@am_eniey personally as someone who doesn't really follow closely riba and all these islamic banking terms & requirements, I fail to see any effective difference in today's islamic products. take my housing loan for example. Yes, the wording and structure is changed such that the bank is not charging me interest, instead now the bank is buying the property and re-selling it to me at a higher price.
however, in the legal docs the bank never really buys the property. the s&p is still only between me and the previous owner.
the 'profit sharing' portion is still based on a %'age that is still pegged to BLR (ok ... technically it's pegged to BFR and not BLR. But since BFR is also in turn pegged to BLR ... what's the difference?)
so in conclusion i can't help but be skeptical. as far as i'm concerned, these loans have removed the "word" interest from their literature but have not removed the concept of interest - it's no different from taking a bottle of champagne, re-packaging it as 'sparkling juice,' and selling it. the base product is still non-halal!
again, I must re-iterate that i know nuts about islamic banking requirements - i'm just saying what my perception is, so feel free to correct me.
I agree with you. Especially with the champagne part. It's just the same. Not Islamic at all. Words and methods are altered to attract/lure more clients. The result is still the same. Borrower must pay more than the the amout borrowed. To make it easy for you, in Islamic term of borrowing is simple. Borrow 1000, pay 1000 disregarding the value. Borrowing however is not encouraged.
This post has been edited by am_eniey: Jan 16 2011, 06:26 PM