maybe 50 - 250mm like dat...
jz to become peeping tom...
hehe...

wow...very cute le..ur puppy?

75-300 also not bad..

yeah my puppy... so hard take photo.. keep walking around. haha.

---

Added on July 4, 2010, 7:05 pmROAR!!!!!



This post has been edited by Mikeshashimi: Jul 4 2010, 07:05 PM

is 75 -300mm sharp enuf...?

hi guys, i'm thinking of getting into the alpha scene but i'm not really sure which should i invest in. my budget range is around the same price as the a350 twin lens kit and the a550 single lens kit, but i was aiming to go for a model that can satisfy me in the long run, current camera i'm using is a bridge camera, the panasonic dmc-fz50, had basic understanding of photography from this camera and thinking of an upgrade

This post has been edited by Borneo928: Jul 4 2010, 07:24 PM

depend lo...what is definition of sharp?...

here my example of my noob shoot...

Camera SONY DSLR-A550
Exposure 0.005 sec (1/200)
Aperture f/8.0
Focal Length 160 mm
ISO Speed 200
Exposure Bias 0 EV
Flash Off, Did not fire



amera SONY DSLR-A550
Exposure 0.013 sec (1/80)
Aperture f/8.0
Focal Length 280 mm
ISO Speed 200
Exposure Bias 0 EV
Flash Off, Did not fire


my opinion...it is acceptably sharp, along with its price tag....that price, is that sharpness lo..


if wan super damn crazy nice sharp...

buy this..

Sony SAL-300F28G Telephoto 300mm f/2.8 APO G SSM Autofocus Lens for Alpha & Minolta Maxxum Series
Price RM20,990.00

miniature effect :

Hehe need the teleconverter somemore if want a longer range..
Using 1.4x means..
75-300 x 1.4 = 105-420mm (:
If use longer teleconverter than sure will b :yummy: more bokehlicious
(Peeping Tom, to the joy!)

Danbo on the left is the mirror image of danbo on the right. Look at the screw in front of danbo's chest.

the picture quality will be further reduced as well?

yup, u are right there...the thing is the mouth..danbo nvr smile

if i recall reading somewhere, anylens that is over F4(eg: F5.6), using TC will make it unable to AF (too dark), so u can only MF with TC+ >F4 (not sure correct or not, correct me if i am wrong)

tc works best with F2.8 lense (AF purpose) other then that, if MF is not a problem, then there is no problem at all

---

Added on July 4, 2010, 8:32 pmor was it after the aperture multiply with the TC should not more then F8?

something like
F4 x 2x tc = F8 (cant AF)
F5.6 x 1.4x tc = F8 (cant AF)

---

Added on July 4, 2010, 8:41 pmahpingko, there are 2 types one TC (of what i read and know of)(and one is extensiob tubes, which is glassless, meant for marco, not tele)

the generic has less glasses and more clearance to fit into any lenses. (each lenses the rear sometimes pops out, hence only generic TC can be use)

the other is the dedicated (sony's TC and Tamron SP-model) which has more glasses, less clearance (limited lens can fit it) and very little quality loses

This post has been edited by ieR: Jul 4 2010, 08:42 PM

Mikeshashimi : cute puppy . wait me back to campus nex week spam more cat picca

ahpingko : for that amount of money to get the 300mm f2.8 i rather get few prime Zeiss or 5D mk2 and some L

went jalan-jalan at taman just now...


This post has been edited by mastering89: Jul 4 2010, 09:31 PM

love the color. looks like old film.

You can get a 50mm f1.0 for that amount too. At least it doesn't hurt your back. LuLz.

my noob attempt to do tilt shift...

my old picture....using digital camera..

ahping, can teach me how to do that?

signither : thank you saya budak baru belajar, test deviantart punya saja

vikingw2k : damn exp . i tot before this 1.0 L cost more than 5k but that is too much . a legendary lens to own

another from km28mm f2.8


This post has been edited by mastering89: Jul 4 2010, 09:55 PM

Here's the real stuff.


The 50mm f1.2 already like RM5k. How can the f1.0 be around 5k?

enhanced version....