Photography The Sony Alpha Thread V42!, The Orange Legion
|
|
 Jul 1 2010, 10:17 PM
|
 
Senior Member
4,480 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: The capital of Soviet Sarawak - Pusak City   
|
QUOTE(mastering89 @ Jul 1 2010, 10:10 PM) i think depends on what effect you want. images produced by film slr mostly is because of the type of film used. if use lomography film like velvia, sensia , x-pro and others. and some say that have to do with the processing step also. i love heartpartrick's photos boyzone : i found somewhere selling rm2.2k (body only) but forgot the link sorry    really stunning |
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 1 2010, 10:23 PM
|
Senior Member
2,816 posts Joined: Sep 2008
|
QUOTE(boyzone @ Jul 1 2010, 10:10 PM) huh? RM2.4k ? i get my a550 with kitlens at a damn damn attractive price... A700 is Rm2999 ... shit.. really make hard to make decision ...   |
|
|
Jul 1 2010, 10:37 PM
|
Junior Member
158 posts Joined: Jun 2010
|
sony a550 body only is about 2.2k...
|
|
|
Jul 1 2010, 10:37 PM
|
|
Senior Member
1,874 posts Joined: Dec 2005 From: Malacca
|
wow...
how attractive izit...? btw... stil searching for tamron 17-50... if anione spot it... can let me know... hehe... |
|
|
Jul 1 2010, 10:46 PM
|
 
Elite
6,075 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 3.1553587,101.7135668
|
|
|
|
Jul 1 2010, 10:49 PM
|
|
Senior Member
2,816 posts Joined: Sep 2008
|
QUOTE(Str33tBoY @ Jul 1 2010, 10:37 PM) wow... lesser than the lowest price u ever get for 550 body only.. how attractive izit...? btw... stil searching for tamron 17-50... if anione spot it... can let me know... hehe...  |
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 1 2010, 10:53 PM
|
|
Senior Member
1,874 posts Joined: Dec 2005 From: Malacca
|
how much...?
btw... bro brainded one seems not very reasonable ler... This post has been edited by Str33tBoY: Jul 1 2010, 10:55 PM |
|
|
Jul 1 2010, 10:58 PM
|
Senior Member
3,065 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
i just compare with my tamron 17-50 vs sony 50mm 1.4mm prime lens is awesome then tamron 17-50 sharpness 50mm win
|
|
|
Jul 1 2010, 11:05 PM
|
|
Senior Member
2,816 posts Joined: Sep 2008
|
i saw lwliam selling his Sony SAL 75-300 f/4.5-5.6 AF with F/R lens cap + hood in alphanatics!!!..price so good..
http://www.alphanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f...=196357#p196357 but, i will like to use to shoot nice bokeh and portrait..this lens is good? |
|
|
Jul 1 2010, 11:07 PM
|
|
Senior Member
4,480 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: The capital of Soviet Sarawak - Pusak City
|
55-200 is sharper
 but 75300 have longer reach |
|
|
Jul 1 2010, 11:08 PM
|
|
Elite
6,075 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 3.1553587,101.7135668
|
QUOTE(ahpingko @ Jul 1 2010, 11:05 PM) i saw lwliam selling his Sony SAL 75-300 f/4.5-5.6 AF with F/R lens cap + hood in alphanatics!!!..price so good.. the sample pics attached in the post are all taken using that lens http://www.alphanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f...=196357#p196357 but, i will like to use to shoot nice bokeh and portrait..this lens is good? |
|
|
Jul 1 2010, 11:08 PM
|
|
Senior Member
3,065 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(ahpingko @ Jul 1 2010, 11:05 PM) i saw lwliam selling his Sony SAL 75-300 f/4.5-5.6 AF with F/R lens cap + hood in alphanatics!!!..price so good.. Good, u saw my GT girl album, half is using 75-300 hahahahttp://www.alphanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f...=196357#p196357 but, i will like to use to shoot nice bokeh and portrait..this lens is good? |
|
|
Jul 1 2010, 11:08 PM
|
|
Senior Member
2,816 posts Joined: Sep 2008
|
QUOTE(kopitiam @ Jul 1 2010, 11:07 PM) 55-200 is sharper i saw review say it is sharp ..but from 200mm above is soft d...i scare i regret...lol...coz i actually looking for prime 50mm 1.8...but i saw his price quite same wif that prime... but 75300 have longer reach |
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 1 2010, 11:10 PM
|
|
Elite
6,075 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 3.1553587,101.7135668
|
most of the pics shown are taken at the far end of the lens, sharp also wat...
|
|
|
Jul 1 2010, 11:11 PM
|
|
Senior Member
4,480 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: The capital of Soviet Sarawak - Pusak City
|
  taken using my 55-200 |
|
|
Jul 1 2010, 11:12 PM
|
Senior Member
4,053 posts Joined: Jun 2009 From: Kuching
|
depends la on how sharp u want.
IMHO, i dislike the 75-300... and ill take the 55200 over the 75300 anyday. |
|
|
Jul 1 2010, 11:13 PM
|
|
Elite
6,075 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 3.1553587,101.7135668
|
  75-300mm |
|
|
Jul 1 2010, 11:13 PM
|
|
Senior Member
4,480 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: The capital of Soviet Sarawak - Pusak City
|
QUOTE(ahpingko @ Jul 1 2010, 11:08 PM) i saw review say it is sharp ..but from 200mm above is soft d...i scare i regret...lol...coz i actually looking for prime 50mm 1.8...but i saw his price quite same wif that prime... with telephoto lens u can take pics from afar aka candids |
|
|
Jul 1 2010, 11:14 PM
|
|
Senior Member
2,816 posts Joined: Sep 2008
|
QUOTE(lwliam @ Jul 1 2010, 11:10 PM) most of the pics shown are taken at the far end of the lens, sharp also wat... honestly good?..QUOTE(Mikeshashimi @ Jul 1 2010, 11:12 PM) depends la on how sharp u want. why le?..reason?...IMHO, i dislike the 75-300... and ill take the 55200 over the 75300 anyday. i really not so pro in this...my need is just nice sharp clear pic..with nice bokeh effect..if can zoom far far, sure good lo...last time i go shoot for sunrise..without zoom...adui..the sun looked so small..  |
|
|
Jul 1 2010, 11:14 PM
|
|
Senior Member
4,480 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: The capital of Soviet Sarawak - Pusak City
|
QUOTE(lwliam @ Jul 1 2010, 11:13 PM) » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « 75-300mm  |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: |  0.0265sec
 0.66
 6 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 8th December 2025 - 01:29 AM |
Quote