49 seems to be pretty cheap. i thought it was going to be 60 bucks. i hope the patches will be sold here before the premiership starts.

yeah im sick and tired of all those morons condemning terry. yeah he might be a little out of way at times like when there were rumors about him going to city. in the end he kept all our backbone key players in the squad and won the double. who did he do this for? Chelsea FC. hell, he could go to any other huge club and win championships, but he did it for us anyways.

yesterday's attempt at a second block, diving with his head really touched me.

there's only one England captain and thats JT.

Carlo knows how to utilize Anelka in his game plan.
It's shame that Domenech tried to play him as a lone striker for France which was not working. He should asked Carlo how to utilize Anelka

no worry for the torres articles..it is awkward if we do bring two main player from our own rival

now, this is better news

Chelsea eye for Tunisian Germanish

but we talking about 60mil possible deal..to be no 2..or no 3...striker..not so good for me..if we sign Torres to be no 1 striker..after DD left then i'm totally back the transfer...

We need one more CM...this part is more important than striker department...

i dont see why we need another playmaker. if i was the coach. i wouldnt trade frank lampard for any other play making midfielder in the world.

fab isnt even close to comparing with frankie.

Prefer Bastian...

i dun think DD want to leave a double champs for an ambitious club with no UCL nex season..

Credit to SuperBlueLions from here http://myespn.go.com/s/conversations/show/...812/sort/oldest

"Winners:

EPL
1954-55, 2004-05, 2005-06, 2009-10

FA Cup (if you dont know the oldest cup on the planet)
1969-70, 1996-97, 1999-00, 2006-07, 2008-09, 2009-10

Uefa Cup Winners Cup
1970-71, 1997-98

Super CUp
1997-98

Chelsea was the first team on the planet to wear numbers on the shirts, thats why during the legendary South American tour of 1929 the were called "Los Numerados", The Numbered Ones. Chelsea is big in south america.

Thats a bit of history, but the fact is that ALMOST EVERY team in EPL has history, for gods sake its birthplace of football. Every team has something, some happy, some tragic, Some may have won more, some less, but each one is unique in its way.

Lets not forget there are teams with more past wins doing great, and those that nobody wants to play for (Leeds) For example Steue Bucharest has won more CL than Chelsea, do any of the players want to play there "because of the history", or do they knock on Red Star Belgrade door ? The fact is that the BIG 4+City are the richest clubs in EPL, so its their history on the spot, it could be any other, QPR, Newcastle, Nottingham Forrest and then their history would be on the spot.

We can argue here for years, but the fact is that players want to be part of history, they want to be history, and only a strong team, good facilites, great staff and a good manager can do it. "

I just post it here because it explains well about the 'history' thing. So whenever rival clubs taunt us about history, here is the answer ^^

well someone still living in the past... can not blame them even more to educate them... sigh

yeah. you never know when the likes of JT and Lampsy will play until. they are very disciplined in training, their fitness level is still in very good condition at this age.