yeah i somehow think that 8 hours is a good one, but if u want to know for sure, u would probably need to go for a solid 24 hours .
QX9650 Overclocking, Run OCCT 4hours++ Considered Stable?
QX9650 Overclocking, Run OCCT 4hours++ Considered Stable?
|
|
Jun 21 2010, 01:34 AM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,196 posts Joined: Oct 2007 |
yeah i somehow think that 8 hours is a good one, but if u want to know for sure, u would probably need to go for a solid 24 hours .
|
|
|
Jun 21 2010, 04:10 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,196 posts Joined: Oct 2007 |
79C considered ok laa .
no need to fork out thousands of dollar on WC just to get a reading of 60C . yes it'll give u more headroom for OC but i dont think its worth it that much . ur doing great with ur OC there . just try to see if u could go with lower vCore . |
|
|
Jun 23 2010, 11:07 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,196 posts Joined: Oct 2007 |
haiyark that's like ur saying any car can drive at 100 but y buy mercedez instead ?
its because of the safety liao . please remember than unstable overclock might be harmful to your hardware as well . example, auto restart and such, can affect ur hardware . i'd say a solid 8 hours is a good stress test . but my low end rig failed after 10 hours . now that is stressful to me T_T possibly unstable ram . |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0148sec
0.38
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 2nd December 2025 - 01:00 PM |