QUOTE(hako @ May 27 2010, 01:21 PM)
It depends on your needs actually, if you are really serious about flash photography and got extra bucks, go for F58AM, or maybe F42AM Photography The Sony Alpha Thread V41!, The Orange Legion
Photography The Sony Alpha Thread V41!, The Orange Legion
|
|
May 27 2010, 05:02 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
451 posts Joined: Jun 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 27 2010, 05:46 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
451 posts Joined: Jun 2005 |
Why HSS is disabled on the F58AM when the head is set to bounce ?
|
|
|
May 28 2010, 01:35 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
451 posts Joined: Jun 2005 |
QUOTE(fansoption @ May 28 2010, 01:10 PM) you can try this technique as well, the same one but using photoshop stacking with photoshop This post has been edited by gizmo_pony: May 28 2010, 01:38 PM |
|
|
May 29 2010, 12:40 AM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
451 posts Joined: Jun 2005 |
|
|
|
May 29 2010, 03:00 AM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
451 posts Joined: Jun 2005 |
QUOTE(albnok @ May 29 2010, 02:29 AM) Gouki: Sony 50mm F1.8 DT SAM has a MFD of 34cm. ooopppss sorry my bad, this is the correct one http://www.glaringnotebook.com/default.asp?id=1427 .. right ? already askd them to amend the linkfansoption: Good to see you're exploring other shots with macro! I like #1 #4 and #5. gizmo_pony: Eh the link wrong lah! |
|
|
Jun 2 2010, 09:14 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
451 posts Joined: Jun 2005 |
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « alluring laa ! |
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 2 2010, 09:38 PM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
451 posts Joined: Jun 2005 |
QUOTE(mastering89 @ Jun 2 2010, 09:29 PM) gizmo_pony : seriously sedap no matter how pricey it is, people will still buy one, the important thing is SEDAP i'm still confused with colors of food, cant balance true color and what i saw on the table. i think the color is quite dull, and maybe slightly underexposed, my 2 cents |
|
|
Jun 2 2010, 09:47 PM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
451 posts Joined: Jun 2005 |
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « waaa, nice details on broccoli, love all the colors ! what lens did you use bro ? Added on June 2, 2010, 9:48 pm QUOTE(lwliam @ Jun 2 2010, 09:36 PM) mastering, for food, your white balance MUST be correct. easily done with us alphas, coz can custom WB on a white card or tissue at restaurants. then overexpose by 1/3 stop, that should be fine other brands cannot use custom WB ?This post has been edited by gizmo_pony: Jun 2 2010, 09:48 PM |
|
|
Jun 2 2010, 10:51 PM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
451 posts Joined: Jun 2005 |
QUOTE(mastering89 @ Jun 2 2010, 10:16 PM) lwliam : owh, forgot about the custom WB . 1st rule, make sure you are not too hungry ! OR else you'll finish the food in no time without taking any good pictures gizmo_pony :the picture was underexposed and i edited abit. not very good at editing, hilang habis color of the koay teow can give tips to compose in food photography?? are there rules or anything like no fork and spoon or something? I am no sifu, but I think it's important to control the depth of field make sure not too shallow , and the food must not be too cluttered. You can try frm different angles, rearrange the food, and make sure the lighting is good |
|
|
Jun 2 2010, 10:58 PM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
451 posts Joined: Jun 2005 |
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « Go finish your study, at the same time, learn photography from sifus here. |
|
|
Jun 2 2010, 11:06 PM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
451 posts Joined: Jun 2005 |
QUOTE(GooD_DaY @ Jun 2 2010, 10:57 PM) But having the fact of sitting in the office is giving me quite a lot of pressure Yes bro William is absolutely correct, don't think too much about your future, it will make u mad Well I know it's not an easy job as I read about you guys' posts, compo, lighting, everything, yeah it's really a headache, I think because I work as Sony promoter as a part time job while waiting my SPM results attracted me to this expensive interests, and oh yeah I'm 18 this year |
|
|
Jun 3 2010, 12:34 AM
Return to original view | Post
#12
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
451 posts Joined: Jun 2005 |
anybody here owns 70-300G ? is it worth to upgrade from beercan to this G lens ?
|
|
|
Jun 3 2010, 12:49 AM
Return to original view | Post
#13
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
451 posts Joined: Jun 2005 |
the flash zoom is according to lens focal length OR 35mm equivalent focal length in aps-c body ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 3 2010, 02:47 PM
Return to original view | Post
#14
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
451 posts Joined: Jun 2005 |
QUOTE(mintii @ Jun 3 2010, 02:38 PM) interested in used A200 ? PM me ok ! selling cheap2 one, I leave in muar summore, but only can sell to you after 14th July when I get back Added on June 3, 2010, 2:49 pmanybody here has 70-300G ? how's the lens compare to beercan ? the IQ ? This post has been edited by gizmo_pony: Jun 3 2010, 02:49 PM |
|
|
Jun 3 2010, 03:06 PM
Return to original view | Post
#15
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
451 posts Joined: Jun 2005 |
QUOTE(Kul | Mo0 @ Jun 3 2010, 02:59 PM) good poison u think i should let go beercan for this lens ? i am afraid of missing the constant f/4 aperture Added on June 3, 2010, 3:08 pm QUOTE(8tvt @ Jun 3 2010, 03:04 PM) yup, I read about it somewhere too, I am worried about the constant aperture my beercan (not bigbeercan)This post has been edited by gizmo_pony: Jun 3 2010, 03:08 PM |
|
|
Jun 3 2010, 03:13 PM
Return to original view | Post
#16
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
451 posts Joined: Jun 2005 |
|
|
|
Jun 3 2010, 03:36 PM
Return to original view | Post
#17
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
451 posts Joined: Jun 2005 |
QUOTE(8tvt @ Jun 3 2010, 03:21 PM) owh u comparing with a different league of lens.. sorry for the confusion, actually I just love the f/4 constant aperture, too much i just don't get.. first u afraid missing the constant aperture then u worry about it? I will let go my beercan then, when I get back in july |
|
|
Jun 3 2010, 03:45 PM
Return to original view | Post
#18
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
451 posts Joined: Jun 2005 |
|
|
|
Jun 3 2010, 03:48 PM
Return to original view | Post
#19
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
451 posts Joined: Jun 2005 |
QUOTE(8tvt @ Jun 3 2010, 03:43 PM) yup that's make it a best buy.. I finally realize that 210 is not sufficient for my skodeng habit, + CA is quite a problem for old minolta lens, including the beercan.but why need 70-300? i'm targeting on budget 70-300.. coz need more.. maybe tamron/sigma.. but not much discuss about it.. not good? |
|
|
Jun 3 2010, 03:55 PM
Return to original view | Post
#20
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
451 posts Joined: Jun 2005 |
QUOTE(8tvt @ Jun 3 2010, 03:50 PM) so anyone wants to book my beercan ? PM me ok, mine is crossed XX version regarding flash, the zoom function is according to the lens focal length itself, or 35mm equivalent ? just want to know Added on June 3, 2010, 3:58 pm QUOTE(lwliam @ Jun 3 2010, 03:52 PM) aish, don't make me confuse maa This post has been edited by gizmo_pony: Jun 3 2010, 03:58 PM |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0509sec
0.62
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 29th November 2025 - 08:22 PM |