for a very long time i din post pic here...just to share my excitement with all the alpha bro and sis here.

mod, if u feel that this pic have some 18SX element, feel free to delete it...
This post has been edited by ahtsong: May 25 2010, 09:27 PM
Photography The Sony Alpha Thread V41!, The Orange Legion
|
|
May 25 2010, 09:26 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,106 posts Joined: Mar 2008 |
I do not have fisheye to posion u guys but very nice photos, aqiera and cjlai
for a very long time i din post pic here...just to share my excitement with all the alpha bro and sis here. ![]() mod, if u feel that this pic have some 18SX element, feel free to delete it... This post has been edited by ahtsong: May 25 2010, 09:27 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
May 25 2010, 09:45 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,106 posts Joined: Mar 2008 |
lwliam, Moo, cjlai, zstan: thanks...
zstan: yup, healthy is more important than anything for a new born BB now-a-day, too much virus/disease floating around. |
|
|
May 25 2010, 09:52 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,106 posts Joined: Mar 2008 |
|
|
|
May 25 2010, 10:23 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,106 posts Joined: Mar 2008 |
QUOTE(ieR @ May 25 2010, 10:18 PM) resize, crop, + pp on the face a bit to remove those pimples. No major PPtaken using a A700 remote without tripod (forgot to bring, just use 2 object to hold my A700 in vertical position) using 50mm 1.4, no flash fire, sun light from the window on the right thus color burn on my leg |
|
|
May 25 2010, 10:32 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,106 posts Joined: Mar 2008 |
|
|
|
May 25 2010, 10:37 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,106 posts Joined: Mar 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 25 2010, 10:44 PM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,106 posts Joined: Mar 2008 |
|
|
|
May 25 2010, 10:57 PM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,106 posts Joined: Mar 2008 |
lwliam, ieR: this is a public, we have no right to stop anyone posting here, but we have the right to ignore...
|
|
|
May 25 2010, 11:05 PM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,106 posts Joined: Mar 2008 |
QUOTE(lwliam @ May 25 2010, 10:53 PM) hahahha, ahtsong, feel sorry for u wehh.. ppl are just too cruel here... maternity shots dont come along often, do try to shoot more when there's an opportunity. QUOTE(ieR @ May 25 2010, 11:02 PM) normal la... mouth ppl's one >.< but i scare u angry me for misunderstanding ma... no worry bro...i won be angry, but use to it since Sony Alpha Thread still < version 10..... |
|
|
May 25 2010, 11:39 PM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,106 posts Joined: Mar 2008 |
Moo u can do better with ur 50mm or 70200...
|
|
|
May 25 2010, 11:43 PM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,106 posts Joined: Mar 2008 |
QUOTE(zstan @ May 25 2010, 11:40 PM) haha.... ya...there is no custom WB in 450D, and the user friendly menu in alpha bring me in this family (i was once consider 450D and A350)iso, aperture and shutter ok.. but the WB..already fixed..5500K means 5500K...in a300..still can custom set a bit...eg. for sunny..still can +3 or -3...erm hope u get what i mean..dont really know how to put it in words.haha..the a300 more user friendly then correct la! and the shooting mode..also all fixed..unlike a300..still can custom adjust even in vivid/potrait mode..very simple..the 450D wan adjust need go through quite a hassle... but i think u play 450D before i dun think i need to explain more.. conclusion: i won leave my a300 anymore!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! unless really no choice. Added on May 25, 2010, 11:42 pm i will point my gun(if i have one) to the security guard and ask him let me in the yacht area. |
|
|
May 26 2010, 12:59 AM
Return to original view | Post
#12
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,106 posts Joined: Mar 2008 |
zstan: awesome, keep it up
|
|
|
May 29 2010, 10:20 AM
Return to original view | Post
#13
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,106 posts Joined: Mar 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 12 2010, 08:23 PM
Return to original view | Post
#14
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,106 posts Joined: Mar 2008 |
ahpingko: nice work....
|
|
|
Jun 14 2010, 06:37 PM
Return to original view | Post
#15
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,106 posts Joined: Mar 2008 |
|
|
|
Jun 14 2010, 08:20 PM
Return to original view | Post
#16
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,106 posts Joined: Mar 2008 |
QUOTE(Kul | Mo0 @ Jun 14 2010, 06:51 PM) guess so...as this is a common issue on 1680Added on June 14, 2010, 8:26 pm QUOTE(Mikeshashimi @ Jun 14 2010, 08:06 PM) see 1st la.. my 50mm gone. haha... i never really actually use that lens.. im not too keen on portraiture... so saving up.. still puzzled on what my next lens is, whether ill get the huge ranged 18250, the wider end 16105, the dual-usage sp90 (portrait and macro) or Tammy 1750 f2.8.... haiz.... for me...i like the 16105, coz i use more on travel...1750 is a very nice 2.8 lens, very good for wedding and indoor 18250.....mm...just get 16105 will be more useful, u will like what 16mm can do. SP90, no comment as i don shoot macro nor model. This post has been edited by ahtsong: Jun 14 2010, 08:26 PM |
|
|
Jun 14 2010, 08:32 PM
Return to original view | Post
#17
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,106 posts Joined: Mar 2008 |
QUOTE(Mikeshashimi @ Jun 14 2010, 08:28 PM) 1)i like the wide end also.... 1. the wide end really useful, not only that, the sharpness, color and contrast, not far from 1680CZ ( i don like CZ due to it's range and gear common issue)2) im thinking of getting this and keeping my 55200 coz IMO the 55200 is very sharp for a telephoto lens. 3) what i like is the range. 4)sp90, the practicality in the sense i can use for both macro and portrait. 2. agree the 55200 is a very nice and light telephoto 3. since u keep ur 55200, u won need this, 55200 can pair with 16105/1750 4. as i said...no comment as this totally dif purpose from the above 3 out of 1,2 and 3, u should only choose one of them. This post has been edited by ahtsong: Jun 14 2010, 08:34 PM |
|
|
Jun 14 2010, 09:09 PM
Return to original view | Post
#18
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,106 posts Joined: Mar 2008 |
|
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0519sec
0.57
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 29th November 2025 - 09:14 AM |