ok. ill assume i get it. haha

Bottom line is. What ever you see on a lens (24mm / 50mm / 100mm etc) remains whatever it is when used on a FF camera. And when used on APSC camera the focal length is multiplied by 1.5

guys~ ieR is in KL now~ he will be going back to east msia on wed night~ he ask if u guys interested to have a TT with him tomoro at KLCC~

---

Added on May 31, 2010, 11:46 pmand multiply by 2 for micro 4/3 sensor~

This post has been edited by Gouki: May 31 2010, 11:46 PM

Why no ppl comment my pic geh?

Why no ppl comment my pic geh?

sifu is in da house

oh, i love the car! hard to find those cars nowadays... but better pray hard that it doesnt rain.. if not hancur la

This post has been edited by lwliam: May 31 2010, 11:51 PM

Sad only love the car hahaha

ppl ask comment bout the pic la, not car lol

but i komen also wadddd

pic #3 abit soft? of the forum problem

1- dont get the message
2- nice but should be more exposed.
3- clone out the thing at the background.
4-??
5- too tight.
6 & 7- nothing to comment
8- the bear was'nt ready
9- again, too tight.

i cincai only.

see more at this link http://picasaweb.google.com/108957830200602813623/20100531#

no one interested to have a TT with bro ieR at klcc?

if yes, mind anyone to do a headcount and organise with ieR? i have his number~ best if u guys call him n organise one~ coz i got sorethroat and lost my voice so hard to speak on the phone~

Ahahah Wrong again.. No, i don mean E3 is fullframe and I don mean to put this Zuiko lens onto a fullframe camera like A900.

cause the spec of the zuiko lens r confusing..I thought they do not Name their lens focal length base on 35mm fullframe camera.. Instead they name it by following their own system (as if the e3 is their fullframe, n all their lenses when mount on their camera will be in FF angles)

er.. okey final observation.. make it simple, if i get this wrong again i think i will give up :

This lens:
* ZUIKO DIGITAL 25mm F2.8
50mm
(35mm camera equivalent)


This Zuiko lens mount on E-3 has the same ANGLE of view/Zoom as when a Sony 50mm lens mount on A900. Tell me this is Absolutely correct!

This post has been edited by clivengu: Jun 1 2010, 12:06 AM

I think shoot wedding is no suit me, i back to macro is better haha

okla, i give proper one la...

your intention of the shots are more on detail shots.. hence the tight angles, and they are pretty well executed. just that for the bride's gown and heels are a bit off target, there is no detail shown in either of the pic, be it the fancy arrangements on the gown flowers, or the laces on the heels.

the shot on the car is good, i like that one.

no.3, i love the side lights on the bride, but it could use some fill light from the front, a small amount will do, nothing which cant be done with some proper photoshopping.

no.6, skin tone's a bit dull, can be PP-ed as well.

again, i love the reflection of the groom on the side mirror. but could be better if its shot a bit wider to show a bit of the surroundings, it would show a nice out of focused background either.

#8, could use a better angle and add a bit more of the background by shooting a bit more wider

#9 is ok...

great to hear ieR is here.. too bad.. occupied tomolo...
1 thing i m curious after i see so many wedding pics by u all. y have to shoot the high heels? have any norms or culture or tradition behind it?

hahhaha, yes NOW it is correct. someone correct me, but as far as i know, all lens focal length are determined by 35mm standards, no such thing as olympus' own focal length standard etc etc

In my humble opinion (after looking at your shots in picasaweb... this is my opinion la)

nearly all your photos are too tight. Not much of the surrounding revealed... just the main subject filling the frame.

But what do I know about wedding shooting... Im just a noobie

This post has been edited by Banzai_san: Jun 1 2010, 12:13 AM

thank thank thank, maybe i shoot too much macro shot haha