what i mean is include the object for reference sake inside the photo WHEN capturing the photo... its like capturing a pyramid alone compared to someone standing beside the pyramid to be taken pic of... then only u will know exactly HOW big the pyramid is.. its to show perspective...

for example:

---

Added on June 15, 2010, 10:11 pmthe ant pic can be done the same way, take a leaf as comparison perhaps? or a coin, or something that ppl would easily get a mental image of when seen.

This post has been edited by lwliam: Jun 15 2010, 10:11 PM

ohhhhh...i see..ok will take that in mind when taking similiar shots...

but moving objects will prove to be another challenge..

here's another original picture..maybe can show the true size better?

err..not really happy with today's shots..but well..perhaps i need more practices on landscaping..lol



iso100
210sec
F/14

This post has been edited by achew: Jun 15 2010, 10:57 PM

dont be so humble lar, master yoda~ its oredi a very good shot for us young padawans here~

fuyoh....the sky is breathtaking!!!!!!!!!!!!!

couple portraits...



seriously need some C&C .. thanks !

i personally think a tight framing for this picture works better.

my 2 cents.

---

Added on June 15, 2010, 11:21 pmand a little bit of glare from the sun/or PP will do wonders IMO.

This post has been edited by zstan: Jun 15 2010, 11:21 PM

Some newbie shot for C&C... thanks

i dun really know how to pp flare...
dunno where to put

@noel

ur first pic if u focus the building IMO the picture will have a greater effect. my 20 cents.

or maybe u emphasising the tree?

i respect ur style.

@noel, come jalan jalan at melaka? lolz? when? shud had ask me out

a badly pp-ed flare will look horrible. you have to take account where the light source is coming from, the angle it strikes the lens front element and from what source.

bad example.

deleted.

This post has been edited by zstan: Jun 15 2010, 11:42 PM

this would fall into my list of badly pp-ed glare/flare/what-not. with a light that strong, the shadows falling on the subject is still normal? the eyes are still open that big?
the main light source is clearly coming from the rear of the subject... how would the flare/glare/what-not be on the front of the subject?

if it's like the one zstan pp-ed, well, i prefer sticking to original...
no offence ya..

anyone noe hw the easy way to do frame using cs5?
i spent like 1 hour doing the damn thing

@achew, is that a hdr?looks awesome!

@noellee69, nice compo =)

what kind of frame u want? normal black frame? ctrl+alt+C

ya..normal black frame with wording like the one in my pic

---

Added on June 15, 2010, 11:49 pmone more question, how to insert 'love' shape using cs5?

This post has been edited by d4rkholeang3l: Jun 15 2010, 11:49 PM

you'd probably need a brush set for that

d4rkholeang3l : sorry i play with your pic