Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 About thermal paste/compound, This might be a stupid question

views
     
TSEdison83
post May 20 2010, 02:26 PM, updated 16y ago

No Games No Life.
******
Senior Member
1,374 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
From: Red Comet




What the good thermal paste for air cooler?
i mean an advance thermal paste available on the market

as for another question, thermal conductivity W/mK, the more lower the better or the higher the better?

Tuniq TX-3 is ok?
mfiazl
post May 20 2010, 02:50 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
29 posts

Joined: Jan 2007


yeah tunix-tx3 is the best value for money..
TSEdison83
post May 20 2010, 03:41 PM

No Games No Life.
******
Senior Member
1,374 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
From: Red Comet




doesnt need to be value for money
wat about the best?
coz thermal paste arent exactly that expensive
mfiazl
post May 20 2010, 04:07 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
29 posts

Joined: Jan 2007


i did some research when i was looking for thermal paste.
tunix-tx3 was one of the best. i bought one n satisfied.

u can google and compare of all the thermal paste u can find/buy.
then decide
TSEdison83
post May 20 2010, 04:36 PM

No Games No Life.
******
Senior Member
1,374 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
From: Red Comet




if i always google then there will be no topic to discuss
*no offence*

how about the thermal conductivity? the lower the better or the higher the better?
darkskies
post May 20 2010, 04:56 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,336 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: 特別壱参番対ゴミ人間調査隊大将



usually the more u google the more confuse u'll get. Any sifus here might as well enlighted him with your experience. I've been doing research on thermal paste and most of them gave different type of chart. Some say tunix some say mx some say ocz. Most of the webbies even show totally different top 1 thermal compounds results. Google might be a good source but none of them will point u the right direction.

This post has been edited by darkskies: May 20 2010, 04:57 PM
mfiazl
post May 20 2010, 04:57 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
29 posts

Joined: Jan 2007


dont worry, none taken.

the higher thermal conductivity, the better it transfer heat between the cpu and heatsink.

for example tuniq tx4 has 6.53w/mk

TSEdison83
post May 20 2010, 06:58 PM

No Games No Life.
******
Senior Member
1,374 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
From: Red Comet




the old CM nano fusion has higher then.... 7+w/mk

thx for the help
alexooi17
post May 28 2010, 01:01 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
569 posts

Joined: Nov 2007


anybody can clarify that cm nano fusion is the best out there ?(available in MY)
SSJBen
post May 28 2010, 01:30 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


The problem with nano fusion is that it is quite mucky.
It'll also have a burn-in time before it works nice.

Wherter its the best or not, I don't think it is.
Tuniq TX-3 is arguably the best still.
AlexLai
post May 28 2010, 01:31 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,531 posts

Joined: Feb 2009
From: Kajang, Selangor



If you can live with it's thick consistency, TX-3 is perhaps the best you can get.
:3mushy:3
post May 28 2010, 02:41 PM

<--~(--+<[o]>+--)~-->
*******
Senior Member
4,723 posts

Joined: Apr 2008
I don't fancy expensive stuffs, just a generic thermal paste works for me. Based on previous builds, the improvement gained was too insignificant, at most 4-5 degrees that I could live without it.
DarkSilver
post May 28 2010, 02:42 PM

Idiosyncrasy
Group Icon
Elite
10,501 posts

Joined: Oct 2009
From: Tamriel


Definitely Tuniq TX-3 or TX-4. Because their performance is great and have very short curing time too. On top of that, they're cheap as well.
Take note that Tuniq TX-3 or TX-4 are not Electrical Conductive which make them safe to be applied on every surfaces.
angrysnail
post May 28 2010, 02:45 PM

SuperStars
******
Senior Member
1,413 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
From: Damansara



tuniq tx-3 4 sure..it the best for me,easy to apply as well..
hadoupening
post May 28 2010, 03:04 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
476 posts

Joined: Jun 2009
From: Altador


TX-3, just very slightly a bit hard to apply, but seems to work quite well. Also, might be just my imagination, but it seems to spread easier and more evenly after applying just a little pressure.
alexooi17
post May 28 2010, 04:57 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
569 posts

Joined: Nov 2007


but for me,i find that tx3 is quite thick..isnt it ?mx2 more dilute.

btw,anybody seling tx-4 here ?

This post has been edited by alexooi17: May 28 2010, 05:02 PM
SSJBen
post May 28 2010, 06:27 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(alexooi17 @ May 28 2010, 04:57 PM)
but for me,i find that tx3 is quite thick..isnt it ?mx2 more dilute.

btw,anybody seling tx-4 here ?
*
MX2 is more expensive, and TX-3 is a better performer... arguably that is.
I don't think TX-3 is too hard to apply really.
angrysnail
post May 28 2010, 06:31 PM

SuperStars
******
Senior Member
1,413 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
From: Damansara



yeah,its a bit thick..i can't use card to spread it..apply a bit and directly put a heatsink to spread it..
DarkSilver
post May 28 2010, 07:09 PM

Idiosyncrasy
Group Icon
Elite
10,501 posts

Joined: Oct 2009
From: Tamriel


I apply scattered around the CPU Surface 1st, then, I use the HSF to spread it. Works like a charm.
Don't eject a whole lump of Thermal Paste in 1 point only. Make it scattered everywhere on the CPU Surface. Easier to spread.
AlexLai
post May 28 2010, 07:11 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,531 posts

Joined: Feb 2009
From: Kajang, Selangor



I had to use a piece of stiff card to spread it around the CPU. After that everything is smooth sailing.

2 Pages  1 2 >Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0191sec    0.24    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 8th December 2025 - 01:28 PM