QUOTE(slimey @ May 19 2010, 03:11 PM)
much higher....since the technology for it is new....hence the materials for it is expensive since there's no large scale production of it...
also, investors are more willing to put their money on more proven systems than a relatively new system
nope.....the sun still don't shine at night... also there's cloudy days....rain all leading to unstable power supply and hence it is hard to calculate how many solar power stations are needed to power a certain industry or population.
unlike fossil fuel based you can increase or decrease output at will.
energy is not stored....it is just sent to the grid as it is produced.....
very bad if we cannot store energy and use a unstable power supply
no need to compare with fossil fuel based actually...
efficiency not high enough to balance the high startup cost and deliver cheap electricity at the same time.....hence the attractiveness of this system to investors is low
attractiveness will increase when the fossil fuel price increase and government incentive is given to develop it.
Added on May 19, 2010, 3:16 pm
that's some seriously high power demand you are talking about..... efficiency and storage issues apply here.....most likely you will need more power from external sources...
but...no doubt that installing that could lower the electricity bills..... as for attractiveness to put solar cells on the roof...depends on how much time is needed to offset its initial cost and the mentality of the people and the cost of electricity per unit...
Well I actually work as an Solar Design Engineer out here in California. Interestingly, what I found was Photovoltaics is actually not new technology, it actually has been around for almost a hundred years. It is true that initial start up costs are high, however, the system has a life-span of 25 to 30 years, and your ROI in Malaysia would be about half of that (Actually, I'm going to say this depends on how much of a utility bill you get in the first place). In California, there are government based and utility based incentives to help balance the cost of Solar systems here and ROIs can go from 4 to 7 years depending on the size of the system. Though, it would be unfair for me to point on California's case. also, investors are more willing to put their money on more proven systems than a relatively new system
nope.....the sun still don't shine at night... also there's cloudy days....rain all leading to unstable power supply and hence it is hard to calculate how many solar power stations are needed to power a certain industry or population.
unlike fossil fuel based you can increase or decrease output at will.
energy is not stored....it is just sent to the grid as it is produced.....
very bad if we cannot store energy and use a unstable power supply
no need to compare with fossil fuel based actually...
efficiency not high enough to balance the high startup cost and deliver cheap electricity at the same time.....hence the attractiveness of this system to investors is low
attractiveness will increase when the fossil fuel price increase and government incentive is given to develop it.
Added on May 19, 2010, 3:16 pm
that's some seriously high power demand you are talking about..... efficiency and storage issues apply here.....most likely you will need more power from external sources...
but...no doubt that installing that could lower the electricity bills..... as for attractiveness to put solar cells on the roof...depends on how much time is needed to offset its initial cost and the mentality of the people and the cost of electricity per unit...
It is true that power is not produced during the night, however you would be surprised that power can still be produced in cloudy weather, though production may be halved or even more. However, all these would have already been taken into account in the first place when sizing a system, so your building/house would be covered. Also, do keep in mind that renewable energy systems will definitely not take over current forms of energy, but it would actually mitigate the amount of coal being burnt, hence making KL's skyline more visible at times.
Efficiency of panels range from 18 to 20 percent and its bound to only go higher. Especially with the recent boom in the European market again due to large incentives and not forgetting the large American market. Prices on PV panels are now so competitive due to the over production in China.
Jun 6 2010, 09:07 PM

Quote
0.0170sec
0.21
6 queries
GZIP Disabled