Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 46 Inch LCD or LED Tv?, Looking for opinions

views
     
TSjackanarchy99
post May 17 2010, 10:31 PM, updated 16y ago

New Member
*
Junior Member
4 posts

Joined: Oct 2007
I've scouted for some HD Tvs but I'm caught between spending almost 7K for a 46inch LED tv or just get an LCD tv. I'm looking for opinions, recommendations for any brands.
opjust
post May 17 2010, 11:57 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
721 posts

Joined: Sep 2009


if u are willing to spend 7k-8k.. better u get a LCD 55inc tv.. much more worth it... toshiba zv model is one of them.. value for ur money
TSjackanarchy99
post May 18 2010, 12:59 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
4 posts

Joined: Oct 2007
QUOTE(opjust @ May 17 2010, 11:57 PM)
if u are willing to spend 7k-8k.. better u get  a LCD 55inc tv.. much more worth it... toshiba zv model is one of them.. value for ur money
*
I'm debating that. But would it be a better investment based on picture quality and all? I'm thinking the LED would be better in the longrun but I'm still thinking if it's a good idea or not.
low98944
post May 18 2010, 01:11 AM

...oooOOOooo...
*******
Senior Member
5,533 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
From: Area 51
Want to join the Dark side? tongue.gif Came and join Plasma. tongue.gif

Cabut...
rick780
post May 18 2010, 09:06 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
38 posts

Joined: Feb 2009


pioneer kuro?
baowen
post May 18 2010, 09:15 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,048 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
From: Klang


definitely LED TV bro, if you got 7~8K budget to spend on a TV, get LED because none of the LCD or plasma can on par with LED performance/quality.

Just depend on whether you are enough on 42" LED tv or you want bigger TV.

paskal
post May 18 2010, 10:58 AM

armchair commando couch potato
*******
Senior Member
2,801 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Darul Aman
let me repharase that..

QUOTE(baowen @ May 18 2010, 09:15 AM)
definitely LED LCD TV bro, if you got 7~8K budget to spend on a TV, get LED LCD TV because none of the LCD or plasma can on par with LED LCD TV performance/quality.

Just depend on whether you are enough on 42" LED LCD tv or you want bigger TV.
*
you do know that the LED TV is just LCD TV with LED backlight, right?
whether it's worth the premium is up to you.
baowen
post May 18 2010, 11:19 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,048 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
From: Klang


yes, but the performance/quality/color/respond time/contrast ratio/ none of the LCD or plasma can beat LED LCD tv.

if you stand in front of LED LCD TV / LCD TV / PLASMA TV, you already can tell the different.


eMKs
post May 18 2010, 11:24 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
647 posts

Joined: Jan 2010
From: Klang
QUOTE(baowen @ May 18 2010, 11:19 AM)
yes, but the performance/quality/color/respond time/contrast ratio/ none of the LCD or plasma can beat LED LCD tv.
*

Plasma can beat LED/LCD easily
enriquelee
post May 18 2010, 11:29 AM

Don't ask for more, ask for COKE
********
All Stars
10,510 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Atlanta

QUOTE(baowen @ May 18 2010, 11:19 AM)
yes, but the performance/quality/color/respond time/contrast ratio/ none of the LCD or plasma can beat LED LCD tv.

if you stand in front of LED LCD TV / LCD TV / PLASMA TV, you already can tell the different.
*
Agree with you. Definately go for LED. But i think respond time LCD and plasma could be as good as LED.

QUOTE(eMKs @ May 18 2010, 11:24 AM)
Plasma can beat LED/LCD easily
*
Elaborate more. If not stop spaming!
lionelzc
post May 18 2010, 11:35 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
333 posts

Joined: Apr 2008


From what I know is that LED TVs cost a lot more that LCDs and plasma now.

For fast objects, go plasma.

Better picture, LCD.

Since LED Tvs are LCDs using LED backlight, you save more on electricity (theoretically)
baowen
post May 18 2010, 11:38 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,048 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
From: Klang


QUOTE(eMKs @ May 18 2010, 11:24 AM)
Plasma can beat LED/LCD easily
*
show me evidence that plasma can beat LED LCD TV

yes it might able to beat LCD TV in some way( LCD only 50~100hz while plasma 400~600hz which mean face pace action, plasma beat it)

in color wise/PQ/respond time/contrast ratio, plasma hardly reach the level smile.gif
V12Kompressor
post May 18 2010, 11:44 AM

No carrots here
*******
Senior Member
2,141 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
From: Muddy Banks


Putting a huge Plasma in the living room will require better cooling and more electricity will be used for the air conditioner to work harder trying to keep the temperature of the room low.

Condition is made worst when the house is using spotlights and other halogen lamp as lighting.
lionelzc
post May 18 2010, 11:47 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
333 posts

Joined: Apr 2008


QUOTE(V12Kompressor @ May 18 2010, 11:44 AM)
Putting a huge Plasma in the living room will require better cooling and more electricity will be used for the air conditioner to work harder trying to keep the temperature of the room low.

Condition is made worst when the house is using spotlights and other halogen lamp as lighting.
*
Really?

This is news to me.

So in terms of energy usage,
plasma>lcd>led.

Correct me if I'm wrong.
mcchin
post May 18 2010, 11:58 AM

SLAVA UKRAINI !
*******
Senior Member
3,902 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: Sin Lor, B'worth,Pg.
anyone knew about the blue light hazard
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-energy_visible_light


art6969
post May 18 2010, 12:06 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,520 posts

Joined: Jul 2009
From: Are Lock Stuck, France
QUOTE(eMKs @ May 18 2010, 11:24 AM)
Plasma can beat LED/LCD easily
*
hahaha are u make a joke or what?

Plasma right now same as rubbish.... we bought tv to see movie/program not our face coz of it reflection issue
eMKs
post May 18 2010, 12:12 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
647 posts

Joined: Jan 2010
From: Klang
This thread could be another battle for plasma vs lcd. I think there is several thread out there for this one.
The downside of the Plasma is on IR issue, power consumption, glare. You can ask all sifu here, most of them using plasma. Performance wise, plasma win. But overall aspect, up to personal taste.
anchovies93
post May 18 2010, 01:49 PM

newbie
*****
Senior Member
902 posts

Joined: Apr 2009
From: Feel like i'm in Mars


I go for plasma myself. Like the other forumer say, most of the sifu here using plasma. Makes you wonder why.

The 2010 plasma models look interesting. Gonna get one myself.

If u can, get pioneer kuro.

Just my 2 cents
-kytz-
post May 18 2010, 02:35 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
12,573 posts

Joined: Nov 2008
LED LCD can beat Plasma?That's joke of the year...

Ever heard of Pioneer Kuro Plasma? sweat.gif doh.gif



This post has been edited by -kytz-: May 18 2010, 02:36 PM
TSjackanarchy99
post May 18 2010, 05:54 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
4 posts

Joined: Oct 2007
QUOTE(-kytz- @ May 18 2010, 02:35 PM)
LED LCD can beat Plasma?That's joke of the year...

Ever heard of Pioneer Kuro Plasma? sweat.gif  doh.gif
*
Yeah I've heard of the Kuro, I'm interested in that although I'm not sure how the price is right now. All I have a references for the Kuro almost 3 years ago, when LCDs and Plasmas cost a fortune.

LEDs have super picture quality, I've been told to stay away from Sony cause they're way too expensive and they under-deliver. Philips has good LCD tvs but the new Samsung LED tvs have amazing picture quality. I'm actually buying for the long run and not having to replace it in 5 years or so.

2 Pages  1 2 >Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0228sec    0.69    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 20th December 2025 - 02:48 AM