ipv6 is a conspiracy of the west to control the media. when it is implemented, all things will have ip, even your TV. ipv4 is enough, seriously

lol.

I think each node can have the /128 prefix.

for ISP process the connectivity to v6 it is straighforward. but to implement as a whole, production..that is one pain in the @$$ process (back to my lengthy explanation earlier)

no fret on v6, even point to point connection where in v4 we use /30 in v6 (based on latest RFC) a point to point connection must use /64 subnet. why, that is what suggested by the RFC's.

end user might see it as a big fuss, but for some ppl it is achievable by having correct knowledge and as of know, the knowledge on v6 is evolving....

the challenge now is actually ..there is yet a solid standard to implement v6 unlike v4, thats the reason the RFC's keep on changing...

on the other hand, NAT is one of the solutions which they thought can overcome the v4 problem (i forgot which year but its about 8 years back)...but NAT is just ...well..in my word as a network guy..problematic for ISP level...it may be feasible for small scale..but not for anything big....

as of now, the RFC suggested the ISP to leased /48 subnet for each node.

let me break it down,

ISP will get /32 allocation ~  /32 subnet will have 2^16 (65536) of /48 subnet

each node will get /48 allocation ~ /48 subnet will have 2^16 (65536) of /64 subnet.

and each /64 subnet is equivalent ipv4 ^2 (which is double the number of current entire v4)

the number is freakingly large....
anyway my company v6 allocation address 2404:b8::/32..its not TM tho..but you can google it up... as of now, maintain the entire core network alone

damn, dumb faggot gomen people not doing shit to migrate to IPv6

i think so

with fews years of ip remaining, they should already pressing panic button for migration to go too full swing

lucky Kal-El not here today
this is very essential to every network guys, including me

you die if basic network 7 layer also forgot