QUOTE(West Wing @ Dec 30 2010, 10:37 AM)
From my own opinion,...........
EMF create disturbance as it oscillate and ultrasonic humidifier also oscillate. .....and as far as my layman knowledge, oscillation create high pitch sound and do cause disturbance to animals. But 2 ultrasonic humidifiers sold to me as sample units are OK and swiftlets still stay and increment is good. So far so good but maybe some experts here do have different opinion on the matter forwarded by me. Oyes, someone did told me that the mist from the ultrasonic humidifier isn't safe for human being as the fine mist can carry diseases airborne, anyone care to forward their knowledge on the matter. Therefore if without any negative feedback from the forum here , I assume that these Ultrasonic Humidifiers is safe for BH .......unless someone disagree. A little experiment from me to share for anyone interested to know.............
Google Ultrasonic humidifier hazards and you will find something very interesting.........EMF create disturbance as it oscillate and ultrasonic humidifier also oscillate. .....and as far as my layman knowledge, oscillation create high pitch sound and do cause disturbance to animals. But 2 ultrasonic humidifiers sold to me as sample units are OK and swiftlets still stay and increment is good. So far so good but maybe some experts here do have different opinion on the matter forwarded by me. Oyes, someone did told me that the mist from the ultrasonic humidifier isn't safe for human being as the fine mist can carry diseases airborne, anyone care to forward their knowledge on the matter. Therefore if without any negative feedback from the forum here , I assume that these Ultrasonic Humidifiers is safe for BH .......unless someone disagree. A little experiment from me to share for anyone interested to know.............
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m087...n50/ai_7650971/
Ultrasonic Humidifiers May Be a Health Hazard
BOISE: Ultrasonic humidifiers that aerosolize water pose a health hazard if tap water is used in them, since minerals and other materials dissolved in the water may be released as particles small enough to be inhaled deep into the lungs.
That is the conclusion of researchers from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. V. Ross Highsmith and Charles E. Rodes from the agency's Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, and Richard J. Hardy of Morrison-Knudsen Engineers in Boise, Idaho studied the impact on indoor air quality in Boise homes when public tap water was used with several types of humidifiers -- ultrasonic, cool-mist, and steam.
Humidifiers are frequently used in winter to alleviate symptoms caused by dry, heated air -- such as chapped lips and irritated throats and noses. Ultrasonic units use electronic transducers to propel water into the air in fine spray; "cool mist" humidifiers use a spinning rotor to drive water through a ring of staggered screens, forcing it into droplets; steam units heat water, causing it to evaporate into the air.
The researchers found that an ultrasonic humidifier run in a kitchen for only six to eight hours raised the particles concentration of the air to four times the 24-hour outdoor particle level allowable by the EPA (which has no particle standards for indoor air quality). When the ultrasonic humidifier was operated in a closed bedroom, the resulting particle concentration in the air was nearly 50 times the EPA's outdoor standard.
Compared with the ultrasonic humidifiers, the cool-mist units generated less than one-third the respirable particle concentration, and a steam unit generated no measureable increase in aerosolized fine particles. The researchers emphasized the potential for ultrasonic humidifiers (and to a lesser extent cool-mist humidifiers) to disperse into the air such harmful waterborne impurities as aluminum, asbestos, and lead.
################################################################################################################################
http://www.nytimes.com/1988/12/22/us/healt...nal-health.html
HEALTH; Personal Health
By Jane E. Brody
Published: December 22, 1988
Millions of buyers of ultrasonic humidifiers who thought they had finally found a safe and effective way to add moisture to the home in the winter heating season have something new to worry about.
Scientists at the Environmental Protection Agency have discovered that the ultrasonic machines can fill household air with tiny particles of minerals and pieces of microorganisms that can be inhaled deep into the lungs, where they may cause allergies or illness.
The potential hazard of ultrasonic humidifiers may come as a bit of a shock to those who bought the machines in the last five years because they are whisper quiet, energy-efficient, effective moisturizers that, unlike cool-mist humidifiers, did not breed harmful microorganisms and spew them into the air.
The new finding explains a number of complaints from consumers who have reported that the use of an ultrasonic humidifier produced a chronic cough or allergic symptoms in one or more household members.
The problem is especially severe when consumers use ordinary mineral-laden tap water to fill their humidifiers and when the machines are not cleaned each day to keep bacteria and molds from accumulating. Particle levels in a closed bedroom could exceed the Federal standard for particles in outdoor air by nearly 50 times, the study showed.
******************************************************************************************************
The mist is so fine that it can be inhaled deep into the lungs.......takutlah because the mist includes very fine impurities. What is the long term effect on humans? Better be safe than sorry? Would switching it off a few hours before we enter the BH helps? Bear in mind that the fine particles get suspended in the air for a considerable length of time.
Ask yourself if you want to breathe in air that has 50 times more particles concentration than outdoor air? This is JEREBU that cannot be seen but is omnipresent in Ultrasonic Humidified BHs. Don't be fooled by our eyes.
The ultrasonic humidifiers were popular in the US in the 80's and 90's but not anymore. Should we be adopting it for our BHs?
Sorry folks, I have doubts and questions but no answers. I KNOW WE SHOULDN'T BELIEVE EVERYTHING FOUND ON THE INTERNET.
This post has been edited by coolandy: Dec 30 2010, 01:23 PM
Dec 30 2010, 12:52 PM

Quote
0.0197sec
0.38
7 queries
GZIP Disabled