QUOTE(Vagrant @ May 7 2010, 05:08 PM)
So for a start, here are the case:
1. A 12 year old kid, home schooled, from North Korea. no access to internet.
2. The father of the 12 year old kid, Lighthouse keeper, hereby called as A
3. The employer of A
4.-------
5. The employer of B
6. The father of the 11 year old kid, sewage cleaner, hereby called as B
7. An 11 year old kid, home schooled, from Liberia, no money for internet.
The connection here, is on the assumption that the connection is best and least through the outside world by going through their father and the employer of their father. Now try connect employer A and employer B, you have to make assumption that all possible of employer A (for lighthouse keeper in north korea and their respective employer) must know employer B ( for all the employer of all sewage cleaner in Liberia)
I choose lighthouse keeper and sewage cleaner as a demonstration of the nature of their work, you could replace it with any work that requires a huge amount of time separated from the society.
As with any thought experiment, our imagination is the limit so I will try to give you a best case scenario to connect #3 to #5.
Lighthouse operators are usually connected to the shipping business. They provide coastal guideposts for ships.
Liberia is also connected with ships. It maintains a popluar maritime registry where it makes money.
There is a possible intersection point. #3 may at one time met #5 when he delivered oil to Pyongyang on a Liberian registered tanker. People connected to the same industry do cross paths. They may have met on shore break. #5 may have quit the shipping, went into self employment where he hired B.
So point #4 can happen under those circumstances.