Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

RTS Starcraft 2 V3.0, Anticipated Launching Date July 27, 2010

views
     
MYNAMEISJASON
post May 5 2010, 03:02 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
107 posts

Joined: Aug 2006


They added the gigantic map editor + new maps which resulted in a larger patch, what so bad with letting it patch a little bit longer.
MYNAMEISJASON
post May 5 2010, 05:37 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
107 posts

Joined: Aug 2006


eh, it only took me 2+ hours to patch version 9 and 10 with a 2meg connection, how could it take so long? blink.gif
MYNAMEISJASON
post May 30 2010, 07:40 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
107 posts

Joined: Aug 2006


QUOTE(Cheesenium @ May 30 2010, 04:08 PM)
No company survive from being generous?

Why is Valve still around then? If Valve is being greedy, i dont think they will give out almost countless contents for TF2, and L4D2 or make your existing PC Steam games also work on a Mac without buying another separate mac only copy.

Just imagine the amount of revenue that Valve could get if they purposely make the PC version of TF2 only work on PC,and vice versa for Macs,considering the fact that there are getting more and more Mac users out there who also want to play games on it.

Every company has to think about it's profits, but the way Activision Blizzard is doing, thats way too much.People will know it sooner or later when they start making more and more crap. Then,they will feel the pain just like what happen to EA and THQ a few years back.
*
Then don't buy the game, simple as that biggrin.gif . Once news comes out that Starcraft 2 fails to meet its hype like MWarfail2, sales is gonna stumble for them cause they have no console fanbase to back them up.

This post has been edited by MYNAMEISJASON: May 30 2010, 07:40 PM
MYNAMEISJASON
post May 31 2010, 02:33 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
107 posts

Joined: Aug 2006


I don't think its fair to completely dismiss cheese's criticism, I've been playing SC1 rather long and I still think SC2 is going a decent direction in gameplay but spiraling into a technical mess like MW2, Bnet 2.0 is in a rather disappointing state to replace LAN even for a beta. doh.gif

user posted image


This post has been edited by MYNAMEISJASON: May 31 2010, 02:36 AM
MYNAMEISJASON
post May 31 2010, 02:43 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
107 posts

Joined: Aug 2006


QUOTE(Quazacolt @ May 31 2010, 02:39 AM)


so when i can get mai ff13 dubbed? wwwwwwww


Added on May 31, 2010, 2:41 am

nice post edit. however for the sake of it, compare:
vs

"Do you like the direction BNET 2.0 is taking?"

see what i mean by QQs?
*
Can you speak with proper English, I don't get what "QQ's " mean doh.gif
MYNAMEISJASON
post May 31 2010, 02:47 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
107 posts

Joined: Aug 2006


QUOTE
Say that blizzard is a restaurant, Starcraft 2 is the food they serve and battlenet 2.0 is the waiter that brings you the food.

Now the food is hands down awesome, it's the best thing you've ever ate, in fact it's so good your mouth orgasms when your tongue touches that culinary delight.

How ever the waiter is a d***.

He doesn't allow you to talk to any one else at the table, but you can whisper to some one close to you as long as no one else hears what you're saying (no chat channels).
When you see some friends of yours at the next table he doesn't allow you to get up and go to them unless you order the exact same thing you've ordered at your table once you reach their table (no xrealm)
If you want salt on your food you have to pay extra, if you want pepper you have to pay extra, if you want to use the napkin, you have to pay extra, if you want a tooth pick, you have to pay extra, if you want to go to the bathroom you have to pay extra (map marketplace).
While you order the waiter places a microphone under your table in order to gather personal information about you, information that he will use to make statistics and sell to other restauranats.
Sharing food between you and your loved one is completly forbidden since there have been case where people would eat for free by doing this (no lan)
The plates, knives, forks and the dinner table are filled with adds.
At the end of the lunch you can't see the whole bill, just the first 2 items you've baught and how much the overall price is, but not the price for the individual items (no world wide ranking)

Now would you WANT to go again to the same restaurant? Even if the food is good?

Would you really be surprised if some one would say "let's not go here anymore untill they fire that waiter?"

Here's a quote from teamliquid front page
MYNAMEISJASON
post May 31 2010, 03:05 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
107 posts

Joined: Aug 2006


QUOTE(Quazacolt @ May 31 2010, 02:56 AM)
the first 3 lines more than summarizes his opinions. however the rest are just (for the most part) nonsensical criticisms.
and again, the main thing is the problem with bnet 2.0, and/or people's problem with the publisher

NOT sc2, NOT with blizzard.

again people: differentiate the difference between publisher, and developer, and activision blizzard vs blizzard.
*
Well if Blizzard can't fix Bnet 2.0, its basically their problem (which I have plenty of faith they will fix it).

The map marketplace is also a big fat joke, do they really have to show their greed that obviously doh.gif I can't imagine myself playing python,destination,trialthon and all the proleague maps for a fee, which oddly resembles another game released by the same publisher.
MYNAMEISJASON
post Jun 3 2010, 11:41 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
107 posts

Joined: Aug 2006


QUOTE(evofantasy @ Jun 3 2010, 01:53 AM)
1.
lol...
it was modified out of the source engine from HL2, not HL1...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Source_engine
gosh u cant event get ur facts rite...

2.
do u know it cost to come up writters for plot, designer for single player campaign, unit design, cutscene rendering...
that 2004 engine is called source engine (its not brand new for TF2, its brand new for HL2)...
so did i mention anything wrong?
it was not develop from scratch (same as the previous engine it tried to use GoldSrc)...
don't tell me engine development doesn't cost $$$...
and do note, a game engine is inclusive of physics as well as AI...
thus a new engine is much more expansive then reusing a old engine...
u do know that the subsequent sc2 (expansions) is cheaper (announced before) because they dun have to develop everything from scratch...

wut valve did was just rebundle everything and sell it back...
it uses other games for what the game itself is lacking...
all u QQers happily mention TF2 over and over again (not orange box) till it gets stale...
dun compare apple with oranges as i've mentioned multiple times...

i just lol where u just have to whine about EVERYTHING
thank god the majority does not think like u...
else every company would have to be doing charity or reusing old engine to make cheaper games...
seriously, go stick to ur orange box and not QQ about every possible news about sc2...
if u are not sick of it, we are...
*
Dude, don't be retarded, the orange box came out with 3 new games at the same time along with 2 old games.
New: TF2, Portal and Episode 2
Old:HL2, Episode 1

Even SC1 didn't cost that much during launch, I'm still disappointed they raised the price just like MW2 when sales on PC is already bad enough and had to split it into 2 expansions just to milk more money out of it.

Anybody watched the entire altitude SC2 competition?
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


QUOTE
Get girl first then worry about parents later.

Here what the top player in SC1 says
QUOTE
Q: Then it seems like you won’t even have time to see your girlfriend after becoming a progamer. Why do you need to maintain this intense practice schedule?
-We need to give up a lot. We need to give up everything that belongs to ourselves, only then can you becomes rank 1, 2. I too gave up everything before coming here. I haven’t even thought about getting a girlfriend. I don’t even see my friends often, only occasionally during holidays. Every day is practice.


This post has been edited by MYNAMEISJASON: Jun 3 2010, 11:48 AM
MYNAMEISJASON
post Jun 3 2010, 01:19 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
107 posts

Joined: Aug 2006


QUOTE(evofantasy @ Jun 3 2010, 12:42 PM)
the difference was blizz have their own game engine that is working great as a results...
TF2 used source engine and only did improvement on some area like facial expression...
the other aspect of the engine remained the same...

more like the hybrid as the next generation of xel'naga since the xel'naga are not immortals...
*
I sincerely do not find starcraft 2's engine on release very impressive, its very modifiable but still lacks behind in terms of visual quality and technical stability as in demanding slightly higher requirements compared to what it can deliver (lets say when compared to dawn of war 2 which looks better and runs better). There is no doubt though blizzard will improve it in oncoming patches though.
MYNAMEISJASON
post Jun 4 2010, 02:17 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
107 posts

Joined: Aug 2006


Here's what the semi progamers think about imba strategies in the game
QUOTE
Do you think there are still “unbeatable” or “overpowered” strategies?

Machine:
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


Incontrol:
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


IdrA:
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

LzGamer:
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


Artosis:
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


Jinro:
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


and what they think about B.net 2
QUOTE
Any thoughts on the lack of chat channels, LAN, and server segregation?
- Hide Spoiler -
Machine:
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

IdrA:
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


Artosis:
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


Jinro:
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


This post has been edited by MYNAMEISJASON: Jun 4 2010, 02:21 PM
MYNAMEISJASON
post Jun 5 2010, 04:02 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
107 posts

Joined: Aug 2006


What Blizzard has to say to complaints

QUOTE
Thanks for the collection of feedback and the constructive tone. Always appreciated.

We're fully aware of the concerns that are being discussed in the various threads, on fansites, detailed through kitten videos, etc. and we're in the midst of working on a comprehensive address that should hit most of the major concerns. Just a heads up.


Even blizzard knows battlenet 2.0 is still super broken, lets see how they fix it
MYNAMEISJASON
post Jun 21 2010, 01:22 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
107 posts

Joined: Aug 2006


Stayed up whole night just to watch the games, tired as hell now sad.gif
MYNAMEISJASON
post Jun 22 2010, 11:48 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
107 posts

Joined: Aug 2006


Might as well wait a while for the price to drop, it wouldn't hurt to see how blizzard would patch the game and fulfill their promises.

QUOTE
Exclusion of the rights of the users to their own created content
ă…‡Blizzard's terms state that all of the user created contents and their rights belong to Blizzard Entertainment
*User created content is defined as the contents in and outside the game created by the users themselves.
*Contents of the game created by users
- Decided by whether the content is made of aspects in the game. Example) A replay, UMS map. These are made with the images and music in the game, so they are considered contents of the game.
*Contents out of the game created by users


I still don't buy the fact that the marketplace was designed to allow users to "sell" their maps without Blizzard making any profit whatsoever, its just a big fat lie for them to earn more money. But since this term has been removed due to Korean Fair Trade Commission as they see how unfair this term is, I would presume the marketplace will not be selling maps anymore since nobody is going to buy Blizzard maps anyway (cause the maps suck so badly).

This post has been edited by MYNAMEISJASON: Jun 22 2010, 11:49 AM
MYNAMEISJASON
post Jun 22 2010, 02:18 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
107 posts

Joined: Aug 2006


QUOTE(yeehai @ Jun 22 2010, 02:12 PM)
Well.. some people may like it and some don't. And some people may think wait a little bit longer to see whether has better offer or not. This doesn't entitle them to received such a comment as "stupid" nor "Talking crap". It is all our own choices and we are here to share opinion.. If we are not free to share opinion and thoughts here then what good is here to forum?  Peace.......
*
He's referring himself as stupid, kindly pardon him
MYNAMEISJASON
post Jun 23 2010, 02:39 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
107 posts

Joined: Aug 2006


QUOTE(JuzJoe @ Jun 23 2010, 12:34 PM)
Thanks for the link!

Anyway after reading the quote from Blizzard I just wanna nip-pick alil on the quote and analyse:
@ the bolded sentense, does that mean that we can't choose which region to play on the fly just like the old battle.net? We have to pick which region. Wonder if it require extra payment etc.
*
Might as well wait, waited for like 10 years, a few months won't hurt anyway.
MYNAMEISJASON
post Jun 24 2010, 02:33 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
107 posts

Joined: Aug 2006


QUOTE
The blizzard had media day for starcraft 2 today, and they have announced few things.

1. Starcraft 2 will be free for WOW players. While you have the wow subscription on the battle.net account, you can just play starcraft 2 for free. (so its not wow subscription anymore, its battle.net 2.0 subscription)

2. There will be no package for Starcraft 2, Blizzard will only sell digital download copy. the price will be around $59

3. If you don't want to buy package, you can also buy Starcraft 2 subscription, one day subscription will be about $2 and one month will be $10

4. There won't be Adult version (if you didn't know, they cut all the scenes and made it teen version)

5. There won't be collector's edition

What do you guys think? I feel sorry for Korea. Well wow players will love this policy

So many people wanted blizzard to announce the collectors edition for Korea today.. now blizzard took out the regular package from them.. Seriously, digital download sucks..
I know that package market is dead in Korea, but I also know that many people would still buy blizzard's game.

Darn, that sure is a smart way to earn money from the Koreans greedily lol biggrin.gif

This post has been edited by MYNAMEISJASON: Jun 24 2010, 02:34 PM
MYNAMEISJASON
post Jun 29 2010, 04:43 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
107 posts

Joined: Aug 2006


QUOTE(talexeh @ Jun 29 2010, 04:35 PM)
In pro-gaming, BOs can be a very big deciding factor. Look at Bisu when he came back from Thailand hibernation. Fuah... BW fans were proclaiming the return of P god (something like that) but it only lasts a few games once his so-called heavily-innovated BO was dissected to nothing.

In pro-gaming world, you can be pretty sure that almost everyone have more or less the same level of micro & macro as you so you gotta rely on something else to get yourself ahead. Micro-macro can be trained up & will remain with you all the time but a particular BO can only be used until someone is able to come up with a perfect counter.
*
Thanks to a function called replay biggrin.gif
MYNAMEISJASON
post Jun 29 2010, 08:30 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
107 posts

Joined: Aug 2006


I still think BO's are more important in SC2, since the individual unit ai has been improved so much where you just attack move and the melee units almost auto surround for you while range unit chase and fire. blink.gif

This post has been edited by MYNAMEISJASON: Jun 29 2010, 08:32 PM
MYNAMEISJASON
post Jun 30 2010, 02:46 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
107 posts

Joined: Aug 2006


QUOTE(evofantasy @ Jun 30 2010, 02:05 AM)
^
fail...
l2focusfire
*
you are the fail man doh.gif
I've sc1 for so long and you're telling how to focus fire, don't act like everyone else here are idoits please. doh.gif
MYNAMEISJASON
post Jun 30 2010, 03:08 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
107 posts

Joined: Aug 2006


QUOTE(evofantasy @ Jun 30 2010, 03:05 AM)
bolded for the failness
*
Try playing SC1 and attack moving a bunch of zerglings into zealots, you'll see what happens

2 Pages  1 2 >Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0481sec    0.37    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 3rd December 2025 - 07:27 AM