QUOTE(camillenoir @ May 19 2010, 02:23 PM)
nah, azazel's point is totally legit.
it is much more convenient for keepers to just release animals into the wild rather than face legal consequences. plain and simple.
if they (wildlife people) had any idea on the real issue at hand, they would've figured out that much by now.
besides, who cares about some kids making RM10 out of a boxie when it can save their asses thousands of RM?
Well, I do agree that to save thousands of RM in fines, the best and easiest way is to release into the wild.
I would do that too. Still thinking what to do with my 2 Juvi Ambos.
Personally for me, if i release my pet turtles into the wild ( ie. the pond ), I would love for them to live there, procreate and have lots of babies.
Call me crazy, but since childhood, I have always had this fascination with creating a colony of turtles or fishes in a pond/area....if anyone spoils my plan then I will be annoyed.....anyway that's just me and my crazy idea.
I also feel sorry for those Ambos kept under deplorable conditions at those pet shops near my house...many lost some scutes and badly diseased and without water.
Hope that with INTESA all these stuff will be phased out. But should not penalise the true pet lovers...Sigh.
Point 2:-
Releasing invasive species is not recommended. Bad for the ecosystem.
My personal experience, the pond used to have a self sustaining colony of gambusia (guppies), catfish and soon hock about 3 years ago.
Then someone released jaguar cichlids and flower horn into the pond.
Now, not a single guppy is left.
Even the local ghost shrimps, which I used to easily get 5 to 6 shrimps in 1 scoop, now I get 1 shrimp with 6 to 7 scoop of the net ( I am not kidding ).
After that, someone released peacock cichlids, now other than the peacock cichlids, I seldom see the anglers catch the flower horns and jaguar chilids for the last 1 year.