Go live in the wilds. Perhaps you may aquire their strength.
Science Why Are Monkeys SO Strong, scientific explanation needed
Science Why Are Monkeys SO Strong, scientific explanation needed
|
|
Apr 30 2010, 10:24 AM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,515 posts Joined: Mar 2010 |
Go live in the wilds. Perhaps you may aquire their strength.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 30 2010, 03:20 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,515 posts Joined: Mar 2010 |
What does that means, Befitozi? If we try to use less brains we will go stronger?
|
|
|
Apr 30 2010, 03:42 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,515 posts Joined: Mar 2010 |
Well, I was thinking along the lines of "jocks nothig but muscles", Befitozi.
|
|
|
Apr 30 2010, 03:53 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,515 posts Joined: Mar 2010 |
Wooh, that means decendents of linebackers will evolved to be gladitors in due time.
|
|
|
May 2 2010, 11:29 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,515 posts Joined: Mar 2010 |
Orang asli, many gennerations but they are still orang asli not apes. Evalotion, most amusing ...heheheheh!!
|
|
|
May 3 2010, 09:22 AM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,515 posts Joined: Mar 2010 |
Wow, you are so sensitive. Is that how your defend your ideas/beliefs? If it makes you feel better Befitozi, you have my apology, but that does not mean I will believe in Darwin's stuff.
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 3 2010, 12:16 PM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,515 posts Joined: Mar 2010 |
Proven? You mean people actually saw monkey evolve into humans?
|
|
|
May 3 2010, 03:54 PM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,515 posts Joined: Mar 2010 |
I did not expect science to be based on circumstantial evidence.
|
|
|
May 3 2010, 04:19 PM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,515 posts Joined: Mar 2010 |
CleverDick,
Making deduction that we come from monkeys sound circumstantial to me. |
|
|
May 3 2010, 04:36 PM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,515 posts Joined: Mar 2010 |
CleverDick,
They contribute to conclude (there is the circunstantial part). Added on May 3, 2010, 4:39 pmBy the way CleverDick, the BBT has many underlying assumption. These assumptions given current level of science is accepted. Newton thinks the most basic is atom and cant be split. People then had theor assumptions. Some mordern scientist prove Newton wrong. Then we had a new level of knowledge and assumption This post has been edited by faceless: May 3 2010, 04:39 PM |
|
|
May 3 2010, 04:50 PM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,515 posts Joined: Mar 2010 |
CleverDick, enough had been said. We can continue without end. Suffice to say, you still will not be able to convince me evolution is a fact. Nor will I be able to convince you evolution is based on circumstantial evidence.
Robert, nice one. I guess those who believe in evolution can accept that we all came from the one cell animal. Not me. |
|
|
May 3 2010, 05:05 PM
Return to original view | Post
#12
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,515 posts Joined: Mar 2010 |
Thanks CleaverDick. I had enjoyed the discussion.
|
|
|
May 3 2010, 05:08 PM
Return to original view | Post
#13
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,515 posts Joined: Mar 2010 |
Perhaps, lim00b but I had enough. Put in CleaverDick's words, I will not try to stop the world from going round.
|
| Change to: | 0.0205sec
0.65
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 26th November 2025 - 02:02 PM |