Only thing limiting it is the 10/100mbps port on the Fiberhome. Biz packages have the same Fiberhome modem if I'm not mistaken.

Even if there was an exploit TMNet can monitor you and such a hack would be a breach of your contract's T&C. I don't think it's worth doing it.
Can we direct our efforts towards configuring other routers for use with Unifi?

Ok, I meant the hack to uncap it and get 100 Mbps. That would only get one in trouble with Tmnet and account suspended at the very least I suspect.

u r from which Seksyen ??
I from Seksyen 8.. saw TM contractors digging hole for the past few month.. 
btw Kota Damansara using which exchange ??

Anyway, getting back on track. Having my dir-615 replaced then writing a guide on how to get it working with your own hardware It'll be up in a few days I guess

Finally, Moogle you found it. But which shop carries these routers?. Quite expensive routers for normal user.

OMG, I managed to connect to the internet directly to VDSL modem provided by TMnet, I may throw DIR615 already.

Default Setting by TMNET to my Condo :

(a) VDSL Modem (Locked by TMnet as a Bridge) --> Dlink DIR615 (as PPPOE Dialer) --> 1) IPTV & 2) Internet
Now, after I gained access to their VDSL modem, I can opt either of these two settings :
(1) VDSL Modem (PPPOE Dialer) --> PC directly

(2) VDSL Modem (Bridge) --> MY OWN WIRELESS ROUTER (PPPOE) --> Internet
OBSERVATION : TMNET purposely locked their devices and force end-user to use their DIR615 router for monitoring reason as highlighted by Rizvanrp.

F*** Tmnet. Very Sick GLC.

BTW, I really wanna thank RIZVANrp, I use the same method Rizvan did for my Cisco RVS4000 by setting "TRUNK" in VLAN Setting of the VDSL Modem which they/TMnet locked in default.

Are you in High rise building or Landed Property?. If High rise building much easier, we can unlock their setting in VDSL Modem. If Landed Property, I believe they provide BTU unit which you can only can access thru DIR615 secondary admin password as what Rizvanrp did.

If you just use the secondary router as a wireless switch/AP, the stress will still be on the DIR-615 as it's performing the network address translation and handling the PPPoE connection.

http://www.smallnetbuilder.com/lanwan/lanw...riefly-reviewed

Here biggrin.gif  I was looking at LYN pricelists and I agree its kinda of hard to find a gigabit wireless N router with full dd-wrt support. As you can see, the GS105E supports VLAN tagging and port mirroring. So the setup would be.. Fiberhome modem -> GS105E (Port 1). Then you set up VLAN ID 500 on port 2 and VLAN ID 600 on port 3. Port 2 will then be able to connect into *any* Wireless router with a WAN/Internet port that supports PPPoE connections. Port 3 would hook up into the STB for IPTV access.

This is what I'm guessing should work based on my tests. The Fiberhome modem basically sends 2 VLANs over the same Cat5 cable so your hardware has to assign each VLAN to a different port in order to use the services.

About the forum thread, what the guy means is basically dd-wrt has no software support for VLANs on gigabit switches. Which is weird because tweiyang11 is using the WRT310N.. maybe the GUI says it supports VLANs but it doesn't actually work? Anyway.. if you dont want to risk flashing your router, you will need a piece of hardware to handle the VLAN tagging and I think the GS105E switch is capable of doing that @ the cost of 60USD. Gonna pick one up soon and test it out

The second way is what I tested and confirmed yesterday, which is using the dir-615 as a vlan switch/bridge. It will perform the VLAN tagging only (putting very little if not no load at all on the dir-615) and enable you to use any router you want with Unifi.

hi riz, i'm noob (1st posting) interested in unifi signup, been reading past posts to catch up. 

moogle (hi!) asked abt your earlier smart switch suggestion, wouldn;t that be cleaner in case the 2ndary (and unofficial) acct gets bumped for whatever reason since vlan tagging is the only (?) issue here ?  yes addit $$ needed for switch but don;t need to touch dlink/backdoor for most ordinary users like me

fiberhome-> smart sw -> generic router -> sw (or another smart sw ?)

unless i am missing something u covered in a post earlier then ok my bad (pls enlighten ?). or too simplistic... ? tks

TM said it is aware of the situation and is preparing an official response.

I get the price cheaper than rm770, and can be further discount if bulk purchase. if somebody need this router too, we can make a bulk purchase and request for further discount. now im considering between dir825 and WNDR3700 =.=

dir825 - cheaper, lifetime warranty, dd-wrt.
WNDR3700 - pricey, 2 years warranty, dd-wrt, and seems like performance better than dir825

pm me for bulk..

@dr3nchippo

I'm aware of 7.01 firmware routers and you have nothing to worry about. If you notice your 7.01 firmware, the login page lists all the accounts on the system. In the latest 7.05, it doesn't do that because they want to 'hide' the secondary operator account.

You only have 'admin' and 'user' on your 7.01 beta tester firmware. 7.05 customer firmware has 'operator' and 'admin' so you have nothing to worry about, just don't update to 7.05 haha