QUOTE
The first Schedule of the Solicitors Remuneration Order 1991 sets out the fees based on the purchase price of the property as follows:-
1.5% on the first RM150,000
0.7% on the next RM4,900,000
0.25% on the remainder
For the schedule for legal fees it is advisable to consult your lawyers for the present calculation of the legal fees.
All transfer of property is subject to Government Stamp Duty. Rate of Stamp Duty is based on the value of property.
1% on the first RM100,000
2% on the next RM400,000
3% on the next RM1,500,000
For the schedule for stamp duty it is advisable to consult your lawyers for the present calculation.
I am thinking on a possible loophole in avoiding RPGT.1.5% on the first RM150,000
0.7% on the next RM4,900,000
0.25% on the remainder
For the schedule for legal fees it is advisable to consult your lawyers for the present calculation of the legal fees.
All transfer of property is subject to Government Stamp Duty. Rate of Stamp Duty is based on the value of property.
1% on the first RM100,000
2% on the next RM400,000
3% on the next RM1,500,000
For the schedule for stamp duty it is advisable to consult your lawyers for the present calculation.
Example,
I buy a property at RM240k, sell it after 3 years for RM300k. Under RPGT, I am required to pay RM60k x 5% = RM3,000
If I marked up the SPA price at the point of purchase to RM300k. My extra cost is RM420(RM60k x 0.7%) + RM1,200(RM60k x 2%) =RM1,620.
I effectively reduce the RPGT to 2.7%.
However this is constrained to several assumptions like selling the prop within 5 years, prop appreciates at the rate of the markup margin, etc.
If this is a viable option, is there any chance for the government to ban SPA markup?
Apr 27 2010, 08:14 PM, updated 16y ago
Quote
0.0187sec
0.38
5 queries
GZIP Disabled