Still, i do find the 3D version to be more captivating, with its depth of field and effects.... the main idea of a 3D movie is to show depth perception, and its relation to each other in the scene. Backgrounds and foreground scenes in 3D are NOT supposed to be sharp and clear..... just as our eyes cant focus on everything we see, only what we are focusing on will be clear and the rest are blur.... if u get a chance to watch 3D again.... the main subjects in focus are sharp, clear and full of details and the background and foreground will be blur.... (with exception of Clash of the Titan, 3D clarity and depth sucked)...
So far, the best 3D movie is How To Train A Dragon, with Avatar coming in 2nd.... the worst? Clash of the Titan.... which also stars Sam Worthington....
My 2 cents.... just watch 3D for the depth and distance, not on clarity of the whole scene....
Added on April 25, 2010, 7:27 pm
QUOTE(gilbertlhl @ Apr 25 2010, 07:20 PM)
True, as many cinemas are still using 35mm film (with grain noise, dirt specks) on lighted projectors.... where as HT setups are running on pure digital images to digital FullHD panels....Even as digital screen halls are matching up the the PQ of FullHD panels, there are too few of them in MY currently...
This post has been edited by Poadster: Apr 25 2010, 07:27 PM
Apr 25 2010, 07:23 PM

Quote
0.0185sec
1.30
7 queries
GZIP Disabled