Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Audio Technica Headphones/Earphones Fan Club V3, Bring it up all....AT Fans..

views
     
awyongcarl
post Feb 20 2011, 07:40 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,870 posts

Joined: Dec 2004


QUOTE(jayxunned @ Feb 16 2011, 11:01 PM)
Need help here, Someone is actually mislead one of my friend. I have introduce an AD-700 for him for a gaming purpose and that guy keep telling him that a Logitech G930 is far more better than AD-700 like how many times with those wide surround sound. I wonder Logitech is a closed headset, why would it be far better soundstage than AD-700?

I was LOL hard for a moment. And he kept lecturing me about the Dolby Certified thing that G930 has and compared it to Cinema Dolby. I said man, you can't compare Cinema Sound to a headphone SQ. He still insist that G930 is better with 7.1 or those 5.1 effects. I know how to argue back, but is there anyway to stop him there and telling him that Logitech is making a marketing effort to deceive him?
*
I have neither of these so I can't comment much but, for gaming, I would not recommend AD-700 lol.
I mean, yes, I know in terms of sound quality, AD-700 for sure is going to beat G930 like nothing.

But when it comes to gaming, it is not necessary that a superior SQ headphone will be advantageous.
If you ask me, I'd get G930 SOLELY for gaming purpose too, I mean well, it's tuned for gaming.
And well, 7.1/5.1 on a headphone is basically a gimmick, depending on how good they emulate the surrounds.

Sure, an Opened back headphone will have better soundstage than a closed, but it does not emulates the 5.1/7.1.
It's still somewhat helpful in Games though, more helpful than an Audiophile headphone (Not to mentioned the Mic too), at least.

Just like I don't game with my K701/HD800. (It just doesn't feel right, somehow)

This post has been edited by awyongcarl: Feb 20 2011, 07:53 AM
awyongcarl
post Feb 21 2011, 04:21 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,870 posts

Joined: Dec 2004


QUOTE(DaEMoNteNTAcLe @ Feb 21 2011, 08:13 AM)
how many games actually have 5.1/7.1?
and how many gaming headphone actually have dedicated driver for the 5.1/7.1 channel?
if its only software emulated 5.1/7.1.. might as well go full stereo, less burden on the pc, the soundcard, less requirement for headphone, similar capabilities.

which makes me wonder.. how come headphone got .1? headphone dont have dedicated woofer for the .1 anyways.. >_<
*
Basically...all the new games nowaday have surrounds lol.
Yeah, good question there, to be frank I know nothing about G930 but I do think it has a built-in soundcard that is responsible to emulate the surrounds.

Anyway..have you tried a 5.1/7.1 headphone before? While playing games like Dead Space/FEAR?
It's something that we always laugh at these fake/emulated surrounds but if done right, it's way better than Stereo lol.
awyongcarl
post Feb 21 2011, 05:17 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,870 posts

Joined: Dec 2004


QUOTE(DaEMoNteNTAcLe @ Feb 21 2011, 05:09 PM)
nope..
i cant really play fps.. i got dizzy too fast its not even funny.
i can play S4 tho, since its a 3rd person, and also since the 3d is sensible, not fish-eyed or boxed.. (reads unreal/quake based 3D engine).
cant really test that, but can always test movies (real 5.1 dvd, 3 or 6 channel blu-rays..)

i do know that listening to sounds alone, a 5.1 setup (i got 5.1 speaker) messed up the imaging with a single point bass sound..
no matter if you see the boom is from.. your right, behind, left, center, front, etc.. boom always comes from the subwoofer, wherever its positioned.
not good for movies imho.
also.. i found it very hard not to mess up the imaging of the sound, too close to each other, the sound overlaps, becomes fuzzy, etc.
to far away and the sense of space is lost. angle and seat position plays a big role as well.

i havent tried 5.1/7.1 headphone yet.
i was actually told that roccat kave 6 driver headphone actually does better position imaging than that person's AD300.
it also runs its own dsp to support its own multi driver, usb powered, can be turned off/on.
drawback is throw sound quality and tonality out of the window. turning the dsp off improves the sound, but u lose the 3D.
*
Well, I guess the best thing would be still letting your friend to try them on. We all know, Opinions are best to keep to ourself.
Personally I could care less about the SQ during a game as long as it doesn't go bad. I'm just going to concentrate on the game itself anyway, long as the headphone produces what's necessary and crucial. And the built-in Mic on these headsets are just handy, I suppose. (Go ahead and laugh at me, I am using Alienware TactX headset for gaming lol)
awyongcarl
post Feb 24 2011, 10:49 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,870 posts

Joined: Dec 2004


QUOTE(antonio @ Feb 24 2011, 10:47 AM)
OEM of Steelseries 5H  rclxms.gif  rclxm9.gif

Sound quality usually the headphone makers have a slight edge but only for their high end or mid to high product...their low end like these gaming headsets all from the same sourced OEM drivers from China or Taiwan such as Fostex or DAIN or other big company who cater similar products...Its just audio company tends to have better response due to their outlook design or their brand wink.gif
*
Yeap. I knew before I purchase lol.
The price i got for it was Rm170 or something, so okay lar. At least the it's doing what it should properly.
awyongcarl
post Mar 7 2011, 09:41 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,870 posts

Joined: Dec 2004


QUOTE(echoesian @ Mar 7 2011, 09:26 PM)
Which one do you think is more "Audiophile" quality?
*
Hard to define lol..I'd say any one that has a "Reference" title on it laugh.gif
Basically..any headphone above RM1k is considered as Audiophile.

In fact..Audiophile = Money spending. The more you spend, you more you are an audiophile. LOL Just kidding,.
awyongcarl
post Mar 28 2011, 06:26 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,870 posts

Joined: Dec 2004


Any review of EW9?
Was thinking of a better portable solution..Was considering about Beyerdynamic T50p but..meh I want something more "fun" on-the-go if you get my drift. lol.
awyongcarl
post Apr 29 2011, 08:13 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,870 posts

Joined: Dec 2004


QUOTE(Geminist @ Apr 29 2011, 07:44 AM)
Hmmm, I doubt I'll spend £750 on a headphone amp when all my components are around the £350 mark.  I think it will only help if I have a very good source to drive the amp.  I am currently using my 5 years old EMU, which I think is on its way out as well. 

I am contemplating of replacing that with a DAC Magic should it go.  Has anyone got any ideas? 

I'm still frankly amazed by the W1000X.  It's so addictive to listen to it and it's hard to actually take it off.  It makes a world of difference compared to the K701 when listening to instrumental music, classical, symphonies etc.
*
Your words have intrigued me.
Because in some musical instrument albums and song..I like K701 more than Senns HD800.
Hmmm maybe I should pick up a W1000x and try too..Or I can just go W5000x if I can find a good deal. (AT are expensive in UK/EU tho)

This post has been edited by awyongcarl: Apr 29 2011, 08:14 AM
awyongcarl
post Apr 29 2011, 08:45 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,870 posts

Joined: Dec 2004


QUOTE(Geminist @ Apr 29 2011, 08:31 AM)
I think for K701 and considering the price, it would be the headphone I recommend for £200 as it is a bit unfair to compared it to a £500 headphone.  I like the K701 because it is to me an analytical headphone.  It's just not as warm/lush for instruments as compared to the W1000X.

I am in London and if you're around I'm happy to meet up.  I like to try the HD800 if I get the opportunity too, as I've only heard HD555 before. 

You can try looking at eBay or pricejapan.  I got mine on eBay so I paid about £150 less than I would if I were to buy the W1000X here in London.
*
Ah lol, I'm in Wrexham. (Uni hostel expiring soon, looking for place to stay until Nov or so lol)
Well I'd love to have a meet up but the train fare to London is expensive :/

Yeah well, K701 is a flawed headphone, that is undeniable (Thus the price), but still, there are still shitloads of merit.
HD800 is even more analytical (Neutral) than K701, and perhaps that is why I prefer K701 than HD800 in certain "situation".

(Yep, K701 is my first reference headphone and it turned me from a basshead into a person who appreciates treble/highs lol)
awyongcarl
post Apr 29 2011, 09:03 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,870 posts

Joined: Dec 2004


QUOTE(Geminist @ Apr 29 2011, 08:48 AM)
laugh.gif The K701 is still one I would go to, I was just a bit crossed with Harman's customer service and I also wanted to try something else (glad I did!).  Hmmm, the HD800 costs a fortune though.
*
I've always thought HD800 would be the end of my journey, but it appears to be the otherwise lol.
It "motivated" or..triggered the ultimate curiosity in me to try out each and every headphones out there sweat.gif
awyongcarl
post May 2 2011, 12:34 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,870 posts

Joined: Dec 2004


QUOTE(fr0sti3 @ May 2 2011, 06:54 AM)
hmmm i think i saw ATH-FC700 on a TV series Fringe Season 3 Episode 21., around the 3 minute mark. can confirm?
but they cover up the label
*
And what about it?
Your point?

Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0464sec    0.32    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 2nd December 2025 - 10:41 AM