Ash, did u check teh ram timing?
i suspect its the ram, not the proc
AMD 64/SEMPRON ---- OC DATABASE, Ocing results..OC problem?ask here..
AMD 64/SEMPRON ---- OC DATABASE, Ocing results..OC problem?ask here..
|
|
May 17 2005, 05:20 PM
Return to original view | Post
#41
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,784 posts Joined: Sep 2004 From: MY |
Ash, did u check teh ram timing?
i suspect its the ram, not the proc |
|
|
|
|
|
May 18 2005, 03:26 AM
Return to original view | Post
#42
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,784 posts Joined: Sep 2004 From: MY |
if 3-4-4-x still got prob, i donno..
beep? disable safety ler |
|
|
May 19 2005, 05:48 PM
Return to original view | Post
#43
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,784 posts Joined: Sep 2004 From: MY |
better in terms?
OC = nforce better functionality = nforce better (even get hardware firewall) solutions = nforce better (single controller chip to handle bus n hw interface) affordable price = via performance/price = definately nforce conclusion? u decide |
|
|
May 20 2005, 12:08 PM
Return to original view | Post
#44
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,784 posts Joined: Sep 2004 From: MY |
u can go figure using A64 tweaker
|
|
|
May 28 2005, 06:22 PM
Return to original view | Post
#45
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,784 posts Joined: Sep 2004 From: MY |
hmm.. seems my proc is left behind
This post has been edited by e-jump: May 28 2005, 10:12 PM |
|
|
Jun 8 2005, 12:00 PM
Return to original view | Post
#46
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,784 posts Joined: Sep 2004 From: MY |
use devider.. thats teh way..set it to 200:166 or 2:1
n pump up those htt w/o worryinng bot teh rams |
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 8 2005, 02:13 PM
Return to original view | Post
#47
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,784 posts Joined: Sep 2004 From: MY |
u can juz put on freakin loose timings, n up the htt
but as for me, i only have prob with 200/133 devider i can only use 200/200, 200/166 n 200/100 i suggest u use 200:100 n ram at spd speed wont give probs.. |
|
|
Jun 15 2005, 02:10 PM
Return to original view | Post
#48
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,784 posts Joined: Sep 2004 From: MY |
QUOTE(remysix @ Jun 13 2005, 10:16 PM) does this has anything to do with the one that i order??? i want this one nope, its the same.. 3000+ owns 3200+ [so far that i know]...at vcore 1.58 only and on air... but mine is 3200+...aiya... for venice, it seems that 3000+ can do better OC than 3200+...if i'm correct, for winnie,it is the otherwise...ada betol ka? |
|
|
Jun 27 2005, 11:11 AM
Return to original view | Post
#49
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,784 posts Joined: Sep 2004 From: MY |
ram at it limits..(current timing)
loosen the timing? |
|
|
Jun 28 2005, 02:28 PM
Return to original view | Post
#50
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,784 posts Joined: Sep 2004 From: MY |
he's using adata ddr600 ler
1:1 summore 2800+ prime stable at 2.7ghz.. even my 3000+ not stable |
|
|
Jun 30 2005, 02:00 PM
Return to original view | Post
#51
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,784 posts Joined: Sep 2004 From: MY |
QUOTE(fatalynx05 @ Jun 30 2005, 12:14 PM) guys my question a bit sound of noob (coz iam noob) may i know hoy the calculation between fsb and ram divider 100/133/166/200...iam kinda blur i'll make it easy..say, ur proc runs at fsb200mhz, n ur rams at ddr400(200mhz).. by this, its 200:200 @ 1:1 ratio using devider is when fsb 200/ram 166[ddr333] , thus its 200:166 say, ur proc can go up to 300fsb, but ur rams only 250mhz[ddr500], u can use 200:166 (try use the calculator) get it? |
|
|
Jul 27 2005, 10:41 AM
Return to original view | Post
#52
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,784 posts Joined: Sep 2004 From: MY |
QUOTE(fatalynx05 @ Jul 26 2005, 07:05 PM) u mean decrease cpu multiplyer and increase fsb to achieve 2.5ghz?? yes..that mean i drop the multiply 8.5*300 2.5 ghz and set the ddr divider to 266 is it like that?? so the ht multiply can set to 2? but y u wanna use HT 2x? 3x300=900, still below 1k.. btw, any of u guys got prob with HT 2x n below? it seems im suffering it.. i cant go above htt350 even using 2x n 1x |
|
|
Jul 27 2005, 11:35 AM
Return to original view | Post
#53
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,784 posts Joined: Sep 2004 From: MY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 28 2005, 01:51 PM
Return to original view | Post
#54
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,784 posts Joined: Sep 2004 From: MY |
so the rams can go higher FSB too
|
|
|
Aug 5 2005, 04:00 PM
Return to original view | Post
#55
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,784 posts Joined: Sep 2004 From: MY |
did u try 3-4-4-x ?
coz even the rams can go that high at 1:1, but it might not when using deviders.. the memory-controllers is not good on deviders i guess.. btw, did u up the chipset voltage? |
|
|
Dec 4 2005, 10:29 AM
Return to original view | Post
#56
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,784 posts Joined: Sep 2004 From: MY |
i'm wondering, any winnie user able to pass 2.7ghz barrier?
esp the ones with ddr600 rams, coz i know winnie' mem controller is shitty on other deviders except 1:1 |
|
|
Dec 29 2005, 10:50 AM
Return to original view | Post
#57
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,784 posts Joined: Sep 2004 From: MY |
n for some reason, my winnie juz bootable at 300x9 ..
any clicks resulted reboot =_=;; i feed it 1.7v, ldt x3 since my s/w monitor cant read nf3ultra temp, whats the highest volt we can feed em?.. n more volt increase stability? coz oC threads dont mention the increment of vchipset affects eanything or not |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0397sec
0.26
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 3rd December 2025 - 07:36 AM |