Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 AMD 64/SEMPRON ---- OC DATABASE, Ocing results..OC problem?ask here..

views
     
e-jump
post May 17 2005, 05:20 PM

┐( ¯3¯)┌
*******
Senior Member
4,784 posts

Joined: Sep 2004
From: MY



Ash, did u check teh ram timing?
i suspect its the ram, not the proc
e-jump
post May 18 2005, 03:26 AM

┐( ¯3¯)┌
*******
Senior Member
4,784 posts

Joined: Sep 2004
From: MY



if 3-4-4-x still got prob, i donno..
beep? disable safety ler
e-jump
post May 19 2005, 05:48 PM

┐( ¯3¯)┌
*******
Senior Member
4,784 posts

Joined: Sep 2004
From: MY



better in terms?
OC = nforce better
functionality = nforce better (even get hardware firewall)
solutions = nforce better (single controller chip to handle bus n hw interface)
affordable price = via
performance/price = definately nforce

conclusion? u decide wink.gif
e-jump
post May 20 2005, 12:08 PM

┐( ¯3¯)┌
*******
Senior Member
4,784 posts

Joined: Sep 2004
From: MY



u can go figure using A64 tweaker wink.gif
e-jump
post May 28 2005, 06:22 PM

┐( ¯3¯)┌
*******
Senior Member
4,784 posts

Joined: Sep 2004
From: MY



hmm.. seems my proc is left behind sweat.gif

This post has been edited by e-jump: May 28 2005, 10:12 PM
e-jump
post Jun 8 2005, 12:00 PM

┐( ¯3¯)┌
*******
Senior Member
4,784 posts

Joined: Sep 2004
From: MY



use devider.. thats teh way..set it to 200:166 or 2:1
n pump up those htt w/o worryinng bot teh rams
e-jump
post Jun 8 2005, 02:13 PM

┐( ¯3¯)┌
*******
Senior Member
4,784 posts

Joined: Sep 2004
From: MY



u can juz put on freakin loose timings, n up the htt
but as for me, i only have prob with 200/133 devider
i can only use 200/200, 200/166 n 200/100

i suggest u use 200:100 n ram at spd speed wont give probs.. smile.gif
e-jump
post Jun 15 2005, 02:10 PM

┐( ¯3¯)┌
*******
Senior Member
4,784 posts

Joined: Sep 2004
From: MY



QUOTE(remysix @ Jun 13 2005, 10:16 PM)
does this has anything to do with the one that i order??? i want this one
...at vcore 1.58 only and on air... sweat.gif
but mine is 3200+...aiya...
for venice, it seems that 3000+ can do better OC than 3200+...if i'm correct, for winnie,it is the otherwise...ada betol ka?
*
nope, its the same.. 3000+ owns 3200+ [so far that i know]
e-jump
post Jun 27 2005, 11:11 AM

┐( ¯3¯)┌
*******
Senior Member
4,784 posts

Joined: Sep 2004
From: MY



ram at it limits..(current timing)
loosen the timing?
e-jump
post Jun 28 2005, 02:28 PM

┐( ¯3¯)┌
*******
Senior Member
4,784 posts

Joined: Sep 2004
From: MY



he's using adata ddr600 ler
1:1 summore drool.gif

2800+ prime stable at 2.7ghz..
even my 3000+ not stable sad.gif
e-jump
post Jun 30 2005, 02:00 PM

┐( ¯3¯)┌
*******
Senior Member
4,784 posts

Joined: Sep 2004
From: MY



QUOTE(fatalynx05 @ Jun 30 2005, 12:14 PM)
guys my question a bit sound of noob (coz iam noob) may i know hoy the calculation between fsb and ram divider 100/133/166/200...iam kinda blur sweat.gif  thx... notworthy.gif  notworthy.gif  notworthy.gif
*
i'll make it easy..

say, ur proc runs at fsb200mhz, n ur rams at ddr400(200mhz).. by this, its 200:200 @ 1:1 ratio

using devider is when fsb 200/ram 166[ddr333] , thus its 200:166

say, ur proc can go up to 300fsb, but ur rams only 250mhz[ddr500], u can use 200:166 (try use the calculator)


get it? wink.gif
e-jump
post Jul 27 2005, 10:41 AM

┐( ¯3¯)┌
*******
Senior Member
4,784 posts

Joined: Sep 2004
From: MY



QUOTE(fatalynx05 @ Jul 26 2005, 07:05 PM)
u mean decrease cpu multiplyer and increase fsb to achieve 2.5ghz??
that mean i drop the multiply 8.5*300 2.5 ghz and set the ddr divider to 266 is it like that?? so the ht multiply can set to 2?
*
yes..
but y u wanna use HT 2x? 3x300=900, still below 1k..

btw, any of u guys got prob with HT 2x n below?
it seems im suffering it..
i cant go above htt350 even using 2x n 1x
e-jump
post Jul 27 2005, 11:35 AM

┐( ¯3¯)┌
*******
Senior Member
4,784 posts

Joined: Sep 2004
From: MY



QUOTE(antonio_zth @ Jul 27 2005, 11:24 AM)
hihih..wanna go 350 wat for...ram cannot follow oso...btw the way my 'dead' LanParty cant even boot at 2x...1x no need try lar...
*
thats the only way to see the proc limits...

yeah, cant boot at 2x n 1x too doh.gif
e-jump
post Jul 28 2005, 01:51 PM

┐( ¯3¯)┌
*******
Senior Member
4,784 posts

Joined: Sep 2004
From: MY



so the rams can go higher FSB too wink.gif
e-jump
post Aug 5 2005, 04:00 PM

┐( ¯3¯)┌
*******
Senior Member
4,784 posts

Joined: Sep 2004
From: MY



did u try 3-4-4-x ?
coz even the rams can go that high at 1:1, but it might not when using deviders..
the memory-controllers is not good on deviders i guess.. btw, did u up the chipset voltage?
e-jump
post Dec 4 2005, 10:29 AM

┐( ¯3¯)┌
*******
Senior Member
4,784 posts

Joined: Sep 2004
From: MY



i'm wondering, any winnie user able to pass 2.7ghz barrier?
esp the ones with ddr600 rams, coz i know winnie' mem controller is shitty on other deviders except 1:1 sweat.gif
e-jump
post Dec 29 2005, 10:50 AM

┐( ¯3¯)┌
*******
Senior Member
4,784 posts

Joined: Sep 2004
From: MY



n for some reason, my winnie juz bootable at 300x9 ..
any clicks resulted reboot =_=;;
i feed it 1.7v, ldt x3

since my s/w monitor cant read nf3ultra temp, whats the highest volt we can feed em?.. n more volt increase stability? coz oC threads dont mention the increment of vchipset affects eanything or not sweat.gif


3 Pages < 1 2 3Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0397sec    0.26    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 3rd December 2025 - 07:36 AM