QUOTE(Roland San @ Jun 14 2010, 03:59 PM)
So say you make it and become rich tomorrow. You go buy a 9ff 997 turbo. Does that automatically make you a cock?
Going back to the Pavilion valet issue, maybe it wouldn't have been that big an issue if owners weren't photographed with their cars, and maybe if plates were blacked out. I know of quite a few owners of exotics who would not want to be associated with their cars on photo in public forums like this for security reasons. Similarly, I also know a few who would not want their cars to be photographed in more personal spaces, like their home garages or their workplace parking. Pavilion valet is fair game as far as I'm concerned, as long as spotters don't overstep the boundaries and place faces and names with cars, and of course leave handprints and such on them. Unfortunately what's done is done. On the plus side, they valet people can't stop spotters taking pics of cars entering or leaving the porte-cochere from the street

I do agree with yr opinion there. Food of thought. But i think taking pictures at the valet is still considered public place.
QUOTE(caerulln @ Jun 14 2010, 04:03 PM)
Yeah try not to be too much a stalker.
We just want to see the cars not who's the owner or where he lives (exceptions to some public figures of course)
Pavilion is a private area so they have the rights to ban us from taking pics.
Just do paparazzi style lor. Shoot & run. Try not to be too obvious

I strongly believe that PAV Valet is NOT a private area as people can go in and out of there as part of the mall. Furthermore, a mall is a public area where the public can go for any reason, so there is no reason for the valet to ban anyone from taking pictures.
Photographing cars is not a crime against the law of this country.