Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

70 Pages « < 24 25 26 27 28 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Hynix RAM Discussion

views
     
Mr_47
post Sep 10 2005, 09:16 PM

***NOT MODERATOR *** Post : +10,000,000,00 Warn: 100%
*******
Senior Member
4,337 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Bora-bora u jelly? Special: Age of multi-monitor



QUOTE(rzonealley @ Sep 9 2005, 07:58 AM)
check many previous pages b4 when i post i test single sided 512.
even me among the 1st to get those ram from my pc.
if u're planning to oc dun get it.
coz how can u OC if one chip running 64mhz rather than
double sided ram running 32mhz/chip.
looking by those number i can see 32mhz got lotsa room to OC.
*
loh.... i tot singleside is better than doubleside. for 4 damn years i belive this.

This post has been edited by Mr_47: Sep 10 2005, 09:17 PM
almostthere
post Sep 10 2005, 11:22 PM

Kepala abah ko
Group Icon
VIP
3,773 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Anywhere lah...as long got Kopi-O



QUOTE(Mr_47 @ Sep 10 2005, 09:16 PM)
loh.... i tot singleside is better than doubleside. for 4 damn years i belive this.
*
For nForce 2, it's true as double sided are hindered by talkback and stuff like that and the nF2 archtecture isn't that well designed to cope with such matters. Double sided OC'ing demands greater luck in reaching high FSB's and that also with certain sacrifices. Like for my BT-D43 double sided, I had to disable clocks-per-command in order to hit 250 Mhz.
SUSceo684
post Sep 11 2005, 12:22 AM

Component Burner
********
All Stars
11,667 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Klang/Subang




Double sided ram takes up more current too..which is why most mobo limited to ddr333 with 4x512 sticks
Mr_47
post Sep 11 2005, 12:23 AM

***NOT MODERATOR *** Post : +10,000,000,00 Warn: 100%
*******
Senior Member
4,337 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Bora-bora u jelly? Special: Age of multi-monitor



QUOTE(almostthere @ Sep 10 2005, 11:22 PM)
For nForce 2, it's true as double sided are hindered by talkback and stuff like that and the nF2 archtecture isn't that well designed to cope with such matters. Double sided OC'ing demands greater luck in reaching high FSB's and that also with certain sacrifices. Like for my BT-D43 double sided, I had to disable clocks-per-command in order to hit 250 Mhz.
*
same here to hit 230 fsb.

This post has been edited by Mr_47: Sep 11 2005, 12:27 AM
HairlessLamer
post Sep 11 2005, 09:31 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
9 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: Pinang Island



I on epox 8rda+ , and i tested few kind of ram with single sided n double sided. But only when i disable the clocks-per-command , the ram will be oc better.
PCcrazy
post Sep 11 2005, 09:36 PM

Milanista
*******
Senior Member
3,224 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: B.B.Bangi



QUOTE(HairlessLamer @ Sep 11 2005, 09:31 PM)
I on epox 8rda+ , and i tested few kind of ram with single sided n double sided. But only when i disable the clocks-per-command , the ram will be oc better.
*
Yup, because you reduce the cycle time. So the ram isn't stressed out. But, performance will degrade as a result of that. So you have to find the balance where you actually gain back performance with CPC off.
Mr_47
post Sep 11 2005, 11:00 PM

***NOT MODERATOR *** Post : +10,000,000,00 Warn: 100%
*******
Senior Member
4,337 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Bora-bora u jelly? Special: Age of multi-monitor



QUOTE(PCcrazy @ Sep 11 2005, 09:36 PM)
Yup, because you reduce the cycle time. So the ram isn't stressed out. But, performance will degrade as a result of that. So you have to find the balance where you actually gain back performance with CPC off.
*
+ more fsb that the way i like it ! thumbup.gif


rzonealley
post Sep 12 2005, 12:44 AM

Freude Am Fahren
*****
Senior Member
968 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Papar/K.Kinabalu



QUOTE(ceo684 @ Sep 11 2005, 12:22 AM)
Double sided ram takes up more current too..which is why most mobo limited to ddr333 with 4x512 sticks
*
since we're talking bout hynix i would say yes to btd43
but half-no to dtd43. coz i test 4stick dtd43 on intel still can run at ddr400
but oc with those 4 stick seem problem coz the memory controller
i guess.

but if on new proc such as venice e3/e6 or intel emt64
the memory controller got even improve for 4x512mb double sided
dual channel mode even for OC.
wtm0325
post Sep 13 2005, 09:25 PM


******
Senior Member
1,796 posts

Joined: Jan 2005

just got a pair of 512mb kvr ddr400 dt d43 at LYP, i'm blur tht i still can find it... it's double sided 1, so i din hesitate it anymore, buy it straight

user posted image
SUSceo684
post Sep 13 2005, 11:24 PM

Component Burner
********
All Stars
11,667 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Klang/Subang




QUOTE(rzonealley @ Sep 12 2005, 12:44 AM)
since we're talking bout hynix i would say yes to btd43
but half-no to dtd43. coz i test 4stick dtd43 on intel still can run at ddr400
but oc with those 4 stick seem problem coz the memory controller
i guess.

but if on new proc such as venice e3/e6 or intel emt64
the memory controller got even improve for 4x512mb double sided
dual channel mode even for OC.
*
The mem controller for intel board handles 4stick well. You used 4x512 (dbl sided) at 2T?

My via kt880 have to use slow timing 3-3-3-8 to run 4x512 (dbl sided) at 2T. Any less memtest fail sweat.gif
rzonealley
post Sep 14 2005, 02:41 AM

Freude Am Fahren
*****
Senior Member
968 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Papar/K.Kinabalu



QUOTE(ceo684 @ Sep 13 2005, 11:24 PM)
The mem controller for intel board handles 4stick well. You used 4x512 (dbl sided) at 2T?

My via kt880 have to use slow timing 3-3-3-8 to run 4x512 (dbl sided) at 2T. Any less memtest fail  sweat.gif
*
yep at 2T.
on intel 1T and 2T doesnt effect much, except 1T give u less room for OC.
but for 4stick ram,timing i still can hit 200mhz@2.5-3-3-7 but at 2.85vdimm.
and performance mood disable.
so lemah la.
super macgyver
post Sep 14 2005, 09:56 AM

★~13k Spam Club~★
********
All Stars
19,322 posts

Joined: Jan 2003



lowyat staff told me dfi k8t880 not support hynix chipset last week,sad now.
SUSceo684
post Sep 14 2005, 01:52 PM

Component Burner
********
All Stars
11,667 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Klang/Subang




QUOTE(super macgyver @ Sep 14 2005, 09:56 AM)
lowyat staff told me dfi k8t880 not support hynix chipset last week,sad now.
*
KT880 lah. Soket A punya. tongue.gif
wtm0325
post Sep 14 2005, 07:28 PM


******
Senior Member
1,796 posts

Joined: Jan 2005

yohoo my dtd43can run at 265fsb 3-3-3-8 at 2.8v
sidewinderz
post Sep 14 2005, 07:29 PM

Long Live UV!!!
*******
Senior Member
3,966 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur



wow...1:1?
where you get it?? i interested leh.. tongue.gif
PCcrazy
post Sep 14 2005, 07:35 PM

Milanista
*******
Senior Member
3,224 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: B.B.Bangi



QUOTE(wtm0325 @ Sep 14 2005, 07:28 PM)
yohoo my dtd43can run at 265fsb 3-3-3-8 at 2.8v
*
1T or 2T?

Hmm, if 2T my BTD43 is capable of 2.5-4-3-6 at 2.85v @ DDR550 / 275 HTT @ Dual Channel
moderno
post Sep 14 2005, 08:48 PM

*Thanks for all the memories & supports! @ LYN**
******
Senior Member
1,924 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: Subang Jaya

QUOTE(PCcrazy @ Sep 14 2005, 07:35 PM)
1T or 2T?

Hmm, if 2T my BTD43 is capable of 2.5-4-3-6 at 2.85v @ DDR550 / 275 HTT @ Dual Channel
*
the ram prime stable in windows bro?...or inside the memtest? drool.gif
wtm0325
post Sep 14 2005, 10:14 PM


******
Senior Member
1,796 posts

Joined: Jan 2005

hehe it's 2T, n my max vdimm is 2.8 only, cant boot at 270 edi tongue.gif

only go the 1st round memtest, then cant wait to test my system tht time edi tongue.gif

sidewinders, u wan it? i'm thinking to sell it, coz my proc is doh.gif
bwky398
post Sep 15 2005, 12:24 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
91 posts

Joined: Apr 2005



QUOTE(shadow_dweller @ Aug 24 2005, 01:49 PM)
hehe .. manage to get my ram running 2.5-4-4-10 1T @ 3V

benchable at 282Mhz
bootable at 284Mhz

on my KVR bt-d43  flex.gif

Genie BIOS Settings:

FSB Bus Frequency - 282
AGP Bus Frequency - 67mhz
Clock Spread Spectrum - Disabled
LDT Downstream Width - Auto
LDT Upstream Width - Auto
LDT/FSB Frequency - X 3.0
CPU/FSB Frequency Ratio - X 8.0

CPU VID Control - 1.500v
CPU VID Special Control - Avove VID * 104%
Chip Set Voltage Control - 1.80v
AGP Voltage Control - 1.70v
DRAM Voltage Control - 3.00v

DRAM Configuration Settings:

DRAM Frequency Set - 200
Command Per Clock (CPC) - Enable
CAS Latency Control (Tcl) - 2.5
RAS# to CAS# delay (Trcd) - 04 Bus Clocks
Min RAS# active time (Tras) - 10 Bus Clocks
Row precharge time (Trp) - 04 Bus Clocks
Row Cycle time (Trc) - 10 Bus Clocks
Row refresh cyc time (Trfc) - 17 Bus Clocks
Row to Row delay (Trrd) - 03 Bus Clocks
Write recovery time (Twr) - 03 Bus Clocks
Write to Read delay (Twtr) - 02 Bus Clocks
Read to Write delay (Trwt) - 03 Bus Clocks
Refresh Period (Tref) - 4708 Cycles
Write CAS Latency (Twcl) - Auto
DQS Skew Control - Decrease Skew
DQS Skew Value - 128
DRAM Drive Strength - Level 1
Max Async Latency - 08.0 Nano Seconds
Read Preamble Time - 06.0 Nano Seconds
IdleCycle Limit - 256 Cycles
Dynamic Counter - Disable
R/W Queue Bypass - Auto
Bypass Max - 07 x
32 Byte Granularity - Disable(8 Bursts)
*
Hi, my Radeon 9550 is using Hynix DRAMs.
Can use these settings to set the memory timings? or
Can someone show me the correct memory timings for a GC?
PCcrazy
post Sep 15 2005, 02:36 AM

Milanista
*******
Senior Member
3,224 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: B.B.Bangi



QUOTE(moderno @ Sep 14 2005, 08:48 PM)
the ram prime stable in windows bro?...or inside the memtest? drool.gif
*
Stable in both of the environment. 2T is nothing to shout about anyhow. rolleyes.gif

QUOTE
Hi, my Radeon 9550 is using Hynix DRAMs.
Can use these settings to set the memory timings? or
Can someone show me the correct memory timings for a GC?


Those are not mem settings for g.card.

70 Pages « < 24 25 26 27 28 > » Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0223sec    0.40    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 7th December 2025 - 05:29 PM