for typing qwerty physical keyboard is better so its N97 Mini or N900

I will personally choose N97 mini over E72 because

(1) Got full qwerty that spaces very well not like E72 very close so if u have big hands u accidentally press wrong key
(2) N97 mini have a 3.2 inch screen vs 2.36inch screen E72 so if the screen so small everything also must look closer
(3) Have 8GB internal memory
(4) Have touch interface so its more fun
(5) The bigger the screen the nicer the GPS navigation if so small while drive its so dangerous
(6) Due to its slide angle your phone can stand on its own
(7) Autofcocus on N97 mini but E72 from wat i heard to focus you must press the T button on keyboard
(8) N97 mini u can choose wherher you wan qwerty or alphanumberic that means u can sms while driving
(9) Plenty of accelerator stuff for N97 mini compare to E72 because of screen size


But for me i prefer Nokia N900 over this both


For more info head to its dedicated page
http://forum.lowyat.net/topic/1371100

This post has been edited by aspire2oo6: Apr 5 2010, 08:42 AM

+1

To some people i know they dont like touchscreen maybe they are not used to it. They somemore ask me is there any phone like N95 ? similar

Its like LCD TV do u prefer to watch on a 14inch TV or a 42 inch LCD?

This post has been edited by aspire2oo6: Apr 5 2010, 09:58 AM

The logic is very simple. If u give the most powerful weapon to an ordinary person it will just be ordinary. Imagine u pass it to an experience or skillful person imagine what an ordinary weapon can become, it will be more deadly than the most powerful weapon. To me i dont listen to people negative comment so much i do my own research then i go test it myself i like it then i buy it. Its like you ask a technical person about investment you end up even more confuse because the logic and terms will be base on their technical knowledge

This post has been edited by aspire2oo6: Apr 5 2010, 02:20 PM

Here an example 1 person tell u 1 phone good good good
another person tell u another phone another guy tell you another make you even more confuse.

Furthermore comparison against milestone and N97 mini is not even fair

N97 mini runs ARM 11 434 MHz processor vs Milestone ARM Cortex A8 600 MHz, PowerVR SGX530 graphics


Its like comparing a pentium 4 pc without external graphic card VS a dual core PC wit external graphic card

Somemore the price different about RM500 or more

An example if u are not sure how to choose

(1) Go test both phone in the shop then choose which u prefer
(2) Then go to the dedicated page and discuss about it. Because if u ask in general section u get general answers
(3) Final is up to u to choose dont let ppl choose for you because you will regret getting it

This post has been edited by aspire2oo6: Apr 5 2010, 02:28 PM

Aino is not a smartphone. N97 mini is a better investment

He just trying to suit your budget.

same tiny like hell.

Your best choice is to get a phone with touchscreen and qwerty keyboard.
The best i tried is Nokia N97 its spaced very well if u have big fingers

If u say similar cannot be because nokia phone u listed above are smartphones when SE similar are not except P1i

if your bill achieve RM238monthly then YES

I am just sharing this no offense to you just for your reference

Let me do a minor comparison for you

Go to the LYNWM section
http://forum.lowyat.net/WindowsMobilePhone...cificDiscussion

and

Nokia Symbian section
http://forum.lowyat.net/SymbianPhone-SpecificDiscussion

Currently u notice WM usually V3 V4 not that many ppl interested. But When u go to the Nokia Symbian Section Nokia 5800XM already reached V27. U imagine 2,500 posts X 26 times +++
So u be the judge which is useless.

This post has been edited by aspire2oo6: Apr 10 2010, 10:44 PM

Even satio today become so successful because its running Symbian.

@chiahau

Win mo your info is correct
but Win Mo been here even before symbian. Window Mobile been around even before the first colour screen phone. Nokia first Smartphone is Nokia 7650 comes with colour
refer the link below for more info
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_Mobile


Symbian is not from linux refer here
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Symbian_OS


Android is running Linux not similar to iphone's OS. Iphone is derived from Mac OS X,
Refer here for more info http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IPhone_OS

Cheers mate

Correct me if i am wrong

This post has been edited by aspire2oo6: Apr 10 2010, 10:57 PM

In responsiveness Vivaz owns Satio due to its CPU 720 MHz, PowerVR SGX graphics furthermore both of them are running Symbian.

If compare to both of this my choice is Vivaz

Sure vivaz will win in HARDWARE
but in flexibility of OS nokia N900 wins here..

can even overclock with N900 can multitask. The community is growing too fast unexpected.

N900 screen is not harder to scroll its very smooth u just use your finger to push it already scroll thanks to kenetic scrolling and capacitive u must use your finger only it works.

With resisitive touch u can use anything as a stylus. Capacitive u cant

More info on comparison is here
http://www.allaboutsymbian.com/features/it...nts_can_win.php

This post has been edited by aspire2oo6: Apr 15 2010, 06:10 PM

nope it lack of mutlitasking too.

Nokia X6 16GB

This post has been edited by aspire2oo6: Apr 17 2010, 11:18 PM

always connected means like sms immediately receive your email,instant messenger etc = BIS

Phones without BIS connected to internet via 3G and drain the battery

we are loving our n900 so much we keep discovering new things we can do
Some of us even manage to dual boot our N900 with maemo and android.

if u very fast boring get iphone