Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Do you believe in SORCERY?, Any scientific evidence

views
     
wongpeter
post Aug 22 2010, 09:54 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
973 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
If science cannot prove the existence of God then this science cannot disprove the existence of ghosts & spirits.

As for magic & sorcery, try to read up on the life of that infamous western occultist Aleister Crowley. A little closer to home would be Mona Fandey. People who knew her when she was alive said she had a tangible power.
wongpeter
post Sep 16 2010, 10:31 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
973 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
QUOTE(jimliew @ Aug 24 2010, 12:19 PM)
Its always second hand sources. Anyone here actually know a real bomoh and witnessed the so called sorcery?
*
And what is the point of your question, that if someone knows a real bomoh and has witnessed this sorcery - he is supposed to come and give you a demo of his prowess? Since you indulge in words and demand proof then maybe I should also use words and ask if you have proof that this sorcery doesn't exist?

This post has been edited by wongpeter: Sep 16 2010, 10:33 PM
wongpeter
post Sep 16 2010, 10:58 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
973 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
QUOTE(robertngo @ Sep 16 2010, 10:37 PM)
how can someone proof sorcery dont exist, it should those who claim it does to show proof.
*
Using the same line of argument I will have to say "how can someone proof sorcery exists, those who claim it doesn't have to show proof."

Kinda like the chicken and egg situation, which came first?


Added on September 16, 2010, 11:16 pm
QUOTE(teongpeng @ Apr 1 2010, 11:56 PM)
If sorcery really work, why dont we see more of it? Instead of fixing football matches, why dont punters just resort to sorcery to influence the results they want and win lots of money that way. Or maybe its already happening just that we dont realise it? unsure.gif

Why bother with scientific explanation when practical explanations cant even be answered.
*
Millions of people believe in God, whichever the religion. How come we don't see more of him???


Added on September 16, 2010, 11:18 pm
QUOTE(robertngo @ Apr 1 2010, 04:39 PM)
people that predict future made tons of prediction, some of them are correct by chance so they use it to prove that their can predict the future, all those failed prediction will not be mentioned again.

claivoyance have never been proven, there are million dollar offer for anyone can demonstrate a single reproducible psychic event, after 30 years no a single person have been able to claim that money.
*
It is a technique called 'cold reading'.


Added on September 16, 2010, 11:20 pm
QUOTE(Xepz @ Apr 20 2010, 10:04 AM)
If all these bomoh so powerful, why they can't prevent the British from taking over Malaya? Tok Janggut was probably a bomoh and had many bomoh friends, right? And same for the others. During that period, I think there were more santau practitioners in Malaya than today.
*
Malaya pakai bomoh, how to win when the British pakai witches, warlocks, shamans and sorcerers! tongue.gif

This post has been edited by wongpeter: Sep 16 2010, 11:20 PM
wongpeter
post Sep 18 2010, 01:43 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
973 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
QUOTE(robertngo @ Sep 17 2010, 03:42 PM)
it is not the same, to proof the sorcery exists you just need to demonstrate a single act that can be duplicated, to proof it does not exists you will have to prove everywhere in the world, every single claim of sorcery is false.

it is like in court case where presumption of innocence mean the prosecution can not make argument like "You can’t prove that the defendant didn’t commit the crime" as the basis for his case. he need to present evidence that show the defendant have indeed commit the crime.
*
it depends on which part of the world you are in. Under British law a person is presumed innocent until proven guilty but under French law a person is guilty until proven innocent.

________________________________________________________________________________________

n/b: this may not be sorcery but like sorcery there are detractors that this sort of thing doesn't exist. it makes for good reading anyway so enjoy.


QUOTE
Ghosts and corpses

2010/03/20

U-EN NG
uen-nst@gmail.com

Believe it or not, resident spirits do roam our theatre venues. U-EN NG talks about his ghostly encounters

MOST theatres have a ghost, and some have more than one. It is difficult to say precisely why this is so — dissatisfied customers, possibly, or maybe the veil separating this world from the other is thinner in places where illusions are frequently made.


Over the centuries theatre managers have seen fit to set “ghost lights” in the middle of the stage during dark nights (such as when the theatre is closed) to let resident spirits put on their own shows or to chase away malevolent remnants of past performances, and in the age before electricity the use of bare candles for this purpose was one of the main reasons why so many theatres burnt down.


The more prosaic dismiss this as mere superstition: ghost lights prevent technicians walking into sets or falling off the stage into the orchestra pit, thereby resulting in personal injury and the sudden manifestation of other frightening entities, to wit, lawyers — but sometimes reason can be a poor mirror to an uncanny reality.


At one of the major Kuala Lumpur venues some years ago, the ensemble of a large musical (sadly, mine) were subject to an inexplicable attack of nosebleeds that stopped after the stage manager discovered an unsettling “young woman” sitting on the electrical console during the show.


On another occasion, while escaping hostile critics displeased with another of my shows, I sneaked into the stairwell by The Actors Studio in Bangsar, only to be lectured to by disembodied whispering. I could not make out what the voice was saying, but gathered that it had to do with my reliance on violence to drive the plot — in any case this was what the critics had a problem with.


On still another occasion, a stage manager watching the monitor during a mixed media production (equal parts film and live theatre) saw me drag across the stage a “corpse” wrapped in a sheet (that is, another actor pretending to be a corpse in a sheet) — when in fact this happened five minutes previously.


Other people have other stories, most of them involving locked dressing-room doors becoming unlocked, or vice-versa; lights going on or off for no apparent reason; sound equipment acting up despite not being plugged in to begin with; and at least one instance of costumes crawling on the ceiling.


There is another kind of corpse, however, that appears very frequently on stage: the term “corpsing” applies to the action of an actor at the moment of distraction: a line is forgotten or one is assailed by crazy-laughter — whatever the cause, the character disappears and the illusion of the stage is broken.


Corpsing really happens only when it is bad enough that the audience notices, as, for example, if Sir Ian McKellen playing Titus Andronicus is unaccountably amused by someone’s phone going off and thereby ceases to be Titus and starts being Ian McKellen, or Gandalf, or Magneto.


However terrifying it might be for the corpse, it is generally very amusing for everyone else: an actor needs to think very quickly to get him or herself out of the problem in a timely and acceptable fashion, with the illusion intact, and this requires a great exercise of wit under pressure.


Sometimes people invent lines on the spot, which is not difficult to do if the play is a modern one. Harold Pinter, for example, was famous for inserting long “pregnant” pauses in his lines that one may exploit with ease; and Samuel Beckett’s lines were so notoriously dense that you can get away with making it up if you know his vocabulary well enough.


It all becomes funnier, however, when one has to do it with Shakespeare or some other ancient dramatist — Sir Peter Ustinov, for example, once famously extemporised Sheridan at length to help a fellow actor who had gone off the rails — but mostly we get away with short-term mumbling, a melodramatic hand to the forehead, or a convincing fumble.
__________________________________________________


U-En Ng is a former parliamentary correspondent and leader-writer. He has dallied with theatre for some time in an effort to prove that you can make a fool of yourself in more ways than one.




"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."
- Arthur C. Clarke


This post has been edited by wongpeter: Sep 18 2010, 01:47 AM
wongpeter
post Sep 19 2010, 12:15 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
973 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
QUOTE(robertngo @ Sep 18 2010, 09:25 AM)
i dont know where you get this, in any modern country innocent until provent guilty is a fundamental right, it is in the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen since the french revolution. it is also in the European Convention on Human Rights

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Declaration_o..._of_the_Citizen
*
sry not France but Mexico.


Added on September 19, 2010, 12:18 am
QUOTE(Awakened_Angel @ Sep 18 2010, 09:31 PM)
let us not dwell far to the realm of Merlin casting fire out of his staff or Gandalf whom shine as bright as the sun with his cloak. Let us talk about psychokinetic. The ability to move objects with mind, or levitation? perhaps. (which the Yoga master or Hindu yogi claim possible)

it is even recorded that that this meditation grandmasters has gain control over their subcontious mind even muscle reflects (that they can stop their heart beat)
Sorcery is the field wherby people with abiblity that is capable of manipualting their surroundings whereby witchcraft is the manupulation/exploitation of other beings other than human for evil conduct.
*
for psychokinesis please research Nina Kulagina. re: 'Psychic discoveries behind the Iron Curtain'





LEVITATION (so why not sorcery?)





.


Added on September 19, 2010, 8:08 pm
QUOTE(Awakened_Angel @ Sep 18 2010, 08:41 AM)
what about malaysia?  biggrin.gif
*
In M'sia the presumption of innocence or guilt is unimportant cos we got ISA. sweat.gif

This post has been edited by wongpeter: Sep 19 2010, 08:08 PM
wongpeter
post Sep 23 2010, 12:20 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
973 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
QUOTE(Awakened_Angel @ Sep 23 2010, 12:13 PM)
malay word nailed it...

"SILAP mata"
*
Shouldn't it be jampi and/or ilmu sihir? hmm.gif

wongpeter
post Sep 23 2010, 03:39 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
973 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
Haunted computers

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


100 apes says this story is true but hopefully that 1 ape will not be back to tell these 100 apes otherwise.




This post has been edited by wongpeter: Sep 23 2010, 03:43 PM
wongpeter
post Sep 24 2010, 12:18 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
973 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
QUOTE(TheDoer @ Sep 24 2010, 12:02 PM)
Do you mind referencing? Extraordinary claims, require extraordinary evidence.

I tried searching online, but couldn't find the case to verify.

A search on the author, turned up with a concept he came up with such as:
Hundredth monkey effect


You are always questioned and shunned for thinking differently from others.
*
maybe you missed this in it's entirety?
QUOTE
All these cases were mentioned in the book 'The Nature of Things' by the author, Lyall Watson who was acclaimed for his book 'Supernature'.


The Nature of Things: The Secret Life of Inanimate Objects

"You are always questioned and shunned for thinking differently from others."
-Seems to me to be a double edged sword meaning it cuts both ways.

This post has been edited by wongpeter: Sep 24 2010, 12:39 PM
wongpeter
post Sep 24 2010, 12:47 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
973 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
"As mentioned, the author doesn't seem credible. (see my findings above.)"
-You may be right. The author doesn't seem credible and maybe....just maybe, Witwatersrand University and the University of London are just degree mills!

QUOTE
He was born in Johannesburg as Malcolm Lyall-Watson. He had an early fascination for nature in the surrounding bush, learning from Zulu and !Kung bushmen. Watson attended boarding school at Rondebosch Boys' High School in Cape Town, completing his studies in 1955. He enrolled at Witwatersrand University in 1956, where he earned degrees in botany and zoology, before securing an apprenticeship in palaentology under Raymond Dart, leading on to anthropological studies in Germany and the Netherlands. Later he earned degrees in geology, chemistry, marine biology, ecology and anthropology. He completed a doctorate of ethology at the University of London, under Desmond Morris. He also worked at the BBC writing and producing nature documentaries.


 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0465sec    0.57    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 28th November 2025 - 01:57 PM