Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
Do you believe in SORCERY?, Any scientific evidence
|
faceless
|
Apr 1 2010, 01:48 PM
|
|
It is ironic that people do not believe in sorcery today but can accept telepath, clairvoyance, psychic, and David Copperfield. If these people had lived in those times would they not be branded as a witch?
|
|
|
|
|
|
faceless
|
Apr 1 2010, 03:33 PM
|
|
Back in the times when witches were at large misdirection of the eye would be deemed as witchcraft, Robert.
|
|
|
|
|
|
faceless
|
Apr 1 2010, 04:18 PM
|
|
Well Robert, if you had those abilities back in the times that scientific knowledge was zero, you would throw in some mumble jumbo or hocus pocus to stand out in the crowd.
How about your beilef in clairvoyance, Robert. There is a good deal of people who can predict the future with some accuracy but they can see the future all the time. So they played it up. Seeming going in to trance ... But we dont call them witch craft. Some are called gypsies. In other societies shaman, bomoh, medium. Yet some who dont do mumbo jumbo scientiest just call them claivoyance.
Added on April 1, 2010, 4:20 pmopps some correction in Full Cap
There is a good deal of people who can predict the future with some accuracy but they CAN'T see the future all the time. So they played it up. Seeming going in to trance ...
This post has been edited by faceless: Apr 1 2010, 04:20 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
faceless
|
Apr 2 2010, 10:40 AM
|
|
People who comes up with many wrong prediction are just make educated guess. There are many analyst making hundreds of prediction on the economy. Robert would you consider Nostradamus to have prediction abilities?
|
|
|
|
|
|
faceless
|
Apr 5 2010, 11:50 AM
|
|
I offer one last resistance to this Robert. It would be a situation in which we can argue till we are blue to the face and we will still hold on to our own views. Hindsight is always 20-20. Foresight is always blurred.
|
|
|
|
|
|
faceless
|
Apr 17 2010, 01:45 AM
|
|
Why mess with them when you can make friends
|
|
|
|
|