Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 3D setup, wanna enjoy 3D

views
     
TSdyn09
post Mar 29 2010, 07:52 AM, updated 16y ago

New Member
*
Junior Member
35 posts

Joined: Dec 2009
Hi guys,

just wanna ask fews questions smile.gif

I'm planning to upgrade my non HDMI AVR to new AVR to enjoy HD audio.
But now with 3D come around, should I wait and upgrade to 3D capable AVR later
or just upgrade now with AVR without 3D, I believed I read somewhere that 3D
will use HDMI v1.4.
If I want to enjoy 3D, I need to upgrade AVR, TV & bd player 3D capable?
or just upgrade one of these?
SiriuslyCold
post Mar 29 2010, 09:25 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,976 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
From: 55100


I think TV and player need to be capable; AVR not so much (except maybe HDMI version)

low98944
post Mar 29 2010, 09:30 AM

...oooOOOooo...
*******
Senior Member
5,533 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
From: Area 51
QUOTE(dyn09 @ Mar 29 2010, 07:52 AM)
Hi guys,

just wanna ask fews questions  smile.gif

I'm planning to upgrade my non HDMI AVR to new AVR to enjoy HD audio.
But now with 3D come around, should I wait and upgrade to 3D capable AVR later
or just upgrade now with AVR without 3D, I believed I read somewhere that 3D
will use HDMI v1.4.
If I want to enjoy 3D, I need to upgrade AVR, TV & bd player 3D capable?
or just upgrade one of these?
*
TV and BD player is a must upgrade in order to enjoy 3D. But for AVR, it is no necessary cause you can choice BD player that got 2 HDMI output (eg.: Panasonic 3D-Ready BD player, etc.). So, 1 output connect you BD player to 3D-Ready TV with HDMI 1.4 and another output connect to HDMI in non 3D-Ready AVR.

Unless you use PS3 as player than you only need to upgrade TV to 3D-Ready TV (max. fps you can select is 24p if you use HDMI 1.3 and AVR also not need to be 3D-Ready)

This post has been edited by low98944: Mar 29 2010, 09:33 AM
TSdyn09
post Mar 29 2010, 04:12 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
35 posts

Joined: Dec 2009
QUOTE(low98944 @ Mar 29 2010, 09:30 AM)
TV and BD player is a must upgrade in order to enjoy 3D.  But for AVR, it is no necessary cause you can choice BD player that got 2 HDMI output (eg.: Panasonic 3D-Ready BD player, etc.).  So, 1 output connect  you BD player to 3D-Ready TV with HDMI 1.4 and another output connect to HDMI in non 3D-Ready AVR.

Unless you use PS3 as player than you only need to upgrade TV to 3D-Ready TV (max. fps you can select is 24p if you use HDMI 1.3 and AVR also not need to be 3D-Ready)
*
thanks notworthy.gif
writesimply
post Mar 30 2010, 12:40 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
934 posts

Joined: Dec 2009
QUOTE(low98944 @ Mar 29 2010, 09:30 AM)
TV and BD player is a must upgrade in order to enjoy 3D.  But for AVR, it is no necessary cause you can choice BD player that got 2 HDMI output (eg.: Panasonic 3D-Ready BD player, etc.).  So, 1 output connect  you BD player to 3D-Ready TV with HDMI 1.4 and another output connect to HDMI in non 3D-Ready AVR.
So far the only 3D BD player in the market that has HDMI 1.4 and 1.3 out is the Panasonic. The rest just use ONE HDMI out.

QUOTE
Unless you use PS3 as player than you only need to upgrade TV to 3D-Ready TV (max. fps you can select is 24p if you use HDMI 1.3 and AVR also not need to be 3D-Ready)
*
Right now we don't know how this is going to work. It could be that there is enough bandwidth for 3D at 720p while still delivering lossless sound (encoded or decoded).

My advice is to wait until the new 3D-capable receivers arrive. Pioneer have already announced theirs. The VSX-920-K and VSX-1020-K should be available by July.

As far as the claims of FullHD 3D is concerned, I don't know if that is possible with a 1920x1080 resolution screen. Consider this anaglyph image.

user posted image
The full resolution of this image is 800x630. But take into account that the blue image is for the right eye and the red image is for the left eye. If you separate the two images, you'd see that their horizontal resolution is no longer 800.

The same is true when a 3D BD movie is played back on a current fixed screen 3D HDTV. Each left and right eye information as stored on the disc are 1920x1080; this is necessary because when the disc is played back on a non-3D BD player or TV, it must display all 1920x1080 pixels. However, when it is played back on a 3D HDTV with a 3D BD player, that horizontal resolution must be rescaled to fit 1920 pixels; this downscaling may also affect the vertical resolution as well.

To get the full resolution, the flat screen panels and even LCD/DLP imaging chips must have slightly more horizontal pixels than what they have now.


fuad

This post has been edited by writesimply: Mar 30 2010, 12:44 AM
SiriuslyCold
post Mar 30 2010, 06:57 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,976 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
From: 55100


are you saying that 761px image you posted is not really 761px? or that somehow it's bigger than a 2D 761px image?

anyhow if you were transmitting these, you'd digitally superimpose them onto a resulting single frame of whatever resolution they are supposed to be, no? so that a 3D 1920x1080 frame contains the same number of bytes a 2D 1920x1080 frame does.

This post has been edited by SiriuslyCold: Mar 30 2010, 07:01 AM
writesimply
post Mar 30 2010, 11:38 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
934 posts

Joined: Dec 2009
QUOTE(SiriuslyCold @ Mar 30 2010, 06:57 AM)
are you saying that 761px image you posted is not really 761px?
No, I'm not saying that.

QUOTE
or that somehow it's bigger than a 2D 761px image?
That is what I'm saying. A 3D image is made of two 2D sources. To include both images, the horizontal resolution must be slightly bigger than 1920.

QUOTE
anyhow if you were transmitting these, you'd digitally superimpose them onto a resulting single frame of whatever resolution they are supposed to be, no? so that a 3D 1920x1080 frame contains the same number of bytes a 2D 1920x1080 frame does.
*
The two images are not superimposed until they are delivered to the 3D HDTV. The 3D HDTV will decide how to show each frame using whichever technology it employs.

Will have to experiment with Photoshop to verify my hypothesis.


fuad
freedom2912
post Mar 30 2010, 11:41 AM

Cool Like Fire
*****
Senior Member
802 posts

Joined: Mar 2009
From: Amsterdam
Each time I watch a 3D movie..
easily got headache rclxub.gif
low98944
post Mar 30 2010, 11:54 AM

...oooOOOooo...
*******
Senior Member
5,533 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
From: Area 51
Here is review for Panasonic's Full HD 3D Blu-ray products. Maybe you will interested.

First look: Panasonic's Full HD 3D Blu-ray products

In this review, you will noted Panasonic BDT300 3D Ready BD player got 2 HDMI outputs ("HDMI Main AV Out" and "HDMI Sub AV Out"), by using this player, you only need AVR got HDMI input is enough instead of go to upgrade expensive 3D-Ready AVR.

user posted image

Here is explanation:
QUOTE
Connections

Here's another potential deal-breaker, but one that need not worry the 3D customer; Full HD 3D is sometimes said to require "HDMI 1.4" connectivity. However, new HDMI standards dictate that any HDMI cable labeled as "High Speed" will work to provide 3D content. Does that still mean that buyers interested in upgrading to 3D Blu-ray need to shell out several hundred more dollars on a new receiver? With Panasonic's solution, the answer is fortunately "no." While owners will need to make sure they're connecting a "High Speed" HDMI cable for use between the Blu-ray player and the plasma television, the BDT300 actually houses a pair of HDMI outputs. The second -- labeled HDMI (SUB) -- when set to "V.OFF" in the player's "HDMI Connection" submenu will output only audio through to the receiver and allow for FullHD 3D video to be sent via the HDMI "High Speed" cable connected between the player and the television, all without the costly upgrade to a new "3D" receiver.
pierreye
post Mar 30 2010, 01:42 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,308 posts

Joined: Oct 2004
From: Penang & Ipoh


I would hold the purchase now until there is clearer picture on the compatibility of equipment. Even 1st gen blu-ray player had compatibility problem with current newer BD profile disc without firmware to upgrade.
writesimply
post Mar 30 2010, 09:41 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
934 posts

Joined: Dec 2009
QUOTE(pierreye @ Mar 30 2010, 01:42 PM)
I would  hold the purchase now until there is clearer picture on the compatibility of equipment. Even 1st gen blu-ray player had compatibility problem with current newer BD profile disc without firmware to upgrade.
*
I would hold off buying first gen equipment but not for the above reasons. The reason why 1st gen BD player need firmware upgrade was due to it being rushed to the market (BD vs. HD-DVD).

3D BD discs must work on 2D BD players as well as 3D BD players. 3D BD players must work with 2D and 3D HDTVs/projector. 3D HDTVs must work with 2D and 3D signals. So far, 3D BD players comes with 3D software (Samsung comes bundled with Monsters vs Aliens while Panasonic came with a 3D sampler) so you know it works.


fuad
SQL INJECTION
post Mar 31 2010, 07:44 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
34 posts

Joined: Feb 2009
From: Klang Valley



Don't forget Sony Expo 3D 2010 tomorrow icon_rolleyes.gif
TSdyn09
post Mar 31 2010, 08:02 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
35 posts

Joined: Dec 2009
very good discussion & explaination thumbup.gif
can help newbies like me to understand more
about this 3D thingy notworthy.gif

looks like i will proceed with my AVR purchase
and no need to wait for 3D avr hmm.gif
writesimply
post Mar 31 2010, 11:05 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
934 posts

Joined: Dec 2009
QUOTE(dyn09 @ Mar 31 2010, 08:02 PM)
looks like i will proceed with my AVR purchase
and no need to wait for 3D avr  hmm.gif
*
I guess you're intent on buying the Panasonic 3D system then. Because anything else may not work with a regular receiver.


fuad

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0180sec    0.78    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 20th December 2025 - 01:01 AM