Nov 1 2014, 06:47 AM
QUOTE(murrayballs @ Nov 1 2014, 04:16 AM)
noted on your points. but can see that tujuan gemilang ni more geared for high end concept
and i just have personal appreciation for designs, too often developments in malaysia is so bland and boring and smacks of laziness (who can blame developer, do simple design right pricing can sell edi)
but looking at tamarind & pjtc & point 92, interesting la..might not get a perfect result but such effort is commendable
not saying tamarind will guarantee attract, but it has its own selling point
and shaftsbury is awesome too
and if wanna bash tamarind and pro shaftsbury, get hyve la!
options aplenty
My observation that Tamarind Suites and Shaftsbury are different for the following:and i just have personal appreciation for designs, too often developments in malaysia is so bland and boring and smacks of laziness (who can blame developer, do simple design right pricing can sell edi)
but looking at tamarind & pjtc & point 92, interesting la..might not get a perfect result but such effort is commendable
not saying tamarind will guarantee attract, but it has its own selling point
and shaftsbury is awesome too
and if wanna bash tamarind and pro shaftsbury, get hyve la!
options aplenty
1. Time horizon. They are 5 years apart. Shaftsbury is current while Tamarind is in the future. Shaftsbury product is delivered can feel, see and touch. Tamarind is in picture. Even that in sales office, nothing to show.
2. Locality. Shaftsbury is nearer towards the commercial zone while Tamarind is towards MMU end with residential enclaves, both high and low density. A touch of competition if one wants to rent out.
3. Concept. Tamarind Suites and Square is trying to combine the chill out factors for younger generation, with touch of Alfresco. Focus of greenery and openness. Cool factors some people call.
4. Price. Tamarind is not the cheapest development in Cyber and surrounding. Not fair to compare Shaftsbury launch price here but subsale is not too far apart. Check iProperty.
5. Developer ability. Shaftsbury has delivered. Tujuan Gemilang has yet to prove. Current projects of PJTC and Point 92 have the concept but lacks the execution and refinement. So Risk Factor to be considered.
This post has been edited by webby88: Nov 1 2014, 06:47 AM
Quote
0.0215sec
0.67
7 queries
GZIP Disabled