Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

> World's cleverest man, Russian Grigory Perelman

views
     
bgeh
post Mar 27 2010, 12:09 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,814 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(lin00b @ Mar 27 2010, 02:08 AM)
whats wrong with the navier-stokes equation? i thought it describes the behaviour of fluid in a flow well enough
*
Well for mathematicians, we tend to think of ODEs/PDEs in terms of:

Given a system of ODEs/PDEs, and a set of Initial/Boundary conditions, does a solution exist? If it exists, is this solution unique? Is it possible to characterise this solution in some way, e.g. is it differentiable, or is it a smooth (infinitely differentiable) solution?

Example: You may remember in engineering maths classes (assuming you did it) that some boundary value problems for some simple ODEs did not have a unique solution.

Back to the Navier-Stokes equation: The challenge (in the Clay Math prize) is, given the Navier-Stokes PDEs, and a set of quite general initial conditions, show that a smooth solution exists globally (not locally), or show otherwise, that no such solution exists.

Interestingly enough, Perelman's proof of the Poincare Conjecture also uses a PDE, the Ricci flow, in which he showed that the singularities of the Ricci flow were 'well behaved' and disappeared in a finite time, giving the 'answer' to Thurston's geometrisation conjecture, which then implies Poincare's conjecture. [I'm only describing approximately what he did here, this is as far as my understanding goes]

This post has been edited by bgeh: Mar 27 2010, 12:10 PM

Bump Topic Add ReplyOptions New Topic
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0519sec    0.60    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 26th November 2025 - 10:45 AM