Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
46 Pages « < 29 30 31 32 33 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Unifi Boycott Unifi - capped connection

views
     
milky
post Mar 27 2010, 01:15 AM

- King -
*******
Senior Member
4,743 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: u noe EARTH ? wher all human being is there




@wan
soon streamyx will get affected one.....say goodbye to open 24/7 computer & modem staying online....1st victim is UNIFI's Customer.. i think by year end Streamyx coming along...
ahpek26
post Mar 27 2010, 01:23 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
475 posts

Joined: Apr 2007


QUOTE(milky @ Mar 27 2010, 01:15 AM)
@wan
soon streamyx will get affected one.....say goodbye to open 24/7 computer & modem staying online....1st victim is UNIFI's Customer.. i think by year end Streamyx coming along...
*
Why are you paraphrasing him, are you a parrot?

I think everyone knows that when UNIfail started to put cap, streamyx will get a cap too because both from the same company.
basher
post Mar 27 2010, 02:07 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
18 posts

Joined: Jul 2008
Cap complain, no cap also complain when UniFAIL throttle.

Malaysians like to ask for the sky but not willing to spend. I truly believe that the cap is more than enough for normal use.

I like this part:
QUOTE
Which would you rather have? Have more quality Internet speeds  within the allocated download usage you paid for or pay for so called Unlimited  package but with high possibility of having your speeds throttled for the sake of “all UniFi subscribers receive equal service quality”.

http://www.soyacincau.com/2010/03/27/tm-un...-bandwidth-cap/
This post has been edited by basher: Mar 27 2010, 02:10 AM
Neptern
post Mar 27 2010, 02:24 AM

On my way
****
Junior Member
518 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
Yes we do complain but the low caps are really ridiculous.

Everyone has different needs for using the internet and tmnut should do something to cater for it.It seems like they wanna put low cap to save cost and as usual squeeze us like shit.
porty
post Mar 27 2010, 03:50 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
19 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
QUOTE(milky @ Mar 26 2010, 11:30 PM)
@facebook reach more than 650fans already... seems that
UNIFI has just loss
650ppl x RM149 = RM96,850 x 24 months = 2,324,400  moneyflies.gif  moneyflies.gif
*
you should probably add 1,000 more for those who cant be bothered to use facebook biggrin.gif

Mokuton
post Mar 27 2010, 04:03 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
51 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
From: Earth
QUOTE(milky @ Mar 27 2010, 01:15 AM)
@wan
soon streamyx will get affected one.....say goodbye to open 24/7 computer & modem staying online....1st victim is UNIFI's Customer.. i think by year end Streamyx coming along...
*
explain how they are going to do that?

we have a contract.. :\

This post has been edited by Mokuton: Mar 27 2010, 04:03 AM
silverhawk
post Mar 27 2010, 08:27 AM

Eyes on Target
Group Icon
Elite
4,956 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


QUOTE(Wan @ Mar 27 2010, 01:08 AM)
TM said themselves that FUP will be implemented across all type of services they offer. They just don't know how much to cap us yet. They're trying to get peoples feedback by saying they would have caps on the current Unifi packages. Even streamyx won't get away from it. Goodbye download 24/7 I guess soon.
*
this is one reason why we need to get the caps for unifi right. can u imagine what the caps on 1mbps streamys will be if 5mbps unifi is just 60gb?

things will scale so expect streamyx to be 10gb or sumthing

iipohbee
post Mar 27 2010, 08:42 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
603 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
Any isp which is willing to come out with 4-6mbps is enough to nail them of their plans.

Believe me.

P1Wimax, DiGi, Jaring, YTL, MetroFON if they were to start offering 3-5mbps services with similar/lower pricing is enough to dent TM.

There's a serious flaw in TM's packages.They are very fresh in this broadband business.

They just can't compete due to the high initial setup costs.
billytong
post Mar 27 2010, 09:43 AM

Lord Sauron
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Mordor, Middle Earth.


I dont like the idea of capping, if they cannot afford to deliver the bandwidth, they should stop offering higher download speed. In fact we are paying at least 10-30 times higher than international Major Telcos. I still cant see how they cant offer unlimited with the small broadband speed they offer here while charging the rates where we should be getting 50-100mbps.

This post has been edited by billytong: Mar 27 2010, 09:44 AM
prasys
post Mar 27 2010, 09:46 AM

Heros Never Die
Group Icon
VIP
12,925 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
From: Kuala Lumpur
You guys are expecting for 1TB of cap. Common even some website packages do offer 20GB of bandwidth quota. But then if you're a heavy downloader you're screwed. For me and to be honest , I rather have the cap which is rather reasonable , umm say 75GB for 5Mbps

I dont want to suffer with slow connection just like streamyx because of certain group of self-centered folks who think that they are the only ones that are paying taxes and downloading things 24/7 !
roommate
post Mar 27 2010, 10:04 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
383 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: anywhere u want =)


QUOTE(prasys @ Mar 27 2010, 09:46 AM)
You guys are expecting for 1TB of cap. Common even some website packages do offer  20GB of bandwidth quota. But then if you're a heavy downloader you're screwed. For me and to be honest , I rather have the cap which is rather reasonable , umm say 75GB for 5Mbps

I dont want to suffer with slow connection just like streamyx because of certain group of self-centered folks who think that they are the only ones that are paying taxes and downloading things 24/7 !
*
+1

Besides many developed country like Aus/UK/US already implementing the Cap policy to ensure the Internet service that they provide is at maximum level.
alexan
post Mar 27 2010, 10:16 AM

Regular
Group Icon
Elite
1,377 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: KL
EXACTLY my point to a lot of people. If its left free flow, users around your neighbourhood will be sucking bandwidth like crazy and your 20Mbps or whatever speed will be crawling when you need to use it the most. Then the backhaul will be 90% utilize by abuse users leaving only 10% for the rest.

QUOTE(prasys @ Mar 27 2010, 09:46 AM)
You guys are expecting for 1TB of cap. Common even some website packages do offer  20GB of bandwidth quota. But then if you're a heavy downloader you're screwed. For me and to be honest , I rather have the cap which is rather reasonable , umm say 75GB for 5Mbps

I dont want to suffer with slow connection just like streamyx because of certain group of self-centered folks who think that they are the only ones that are paying taxes and downloading things 24/7 !
*
This post has been edited by alexan: Mar 27 2010, 10:16 AM
billytong
post Mar 27 2010, 10:22 AM

Lord Sauron
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Mordor, Middle Earth.


QUOTE(prasys @ Mar 27 2010, 09:46 AM)
You guys are expecting for 1TB of cap. Common even some website packages do offer  20GB of bandwidth quota. But then if you're a heavy downloader you're screwed. For me and to be honest , I rather have the cap which is rather reasonable , umm say 75GB for 5Mbps

I dont want to suffer with slow connection just like streamyx because of certain group of self-centered folks who think that they are the only ones that are paying taxes and downloading things 24/7 !
*

Well the fact is the price that TM charging us is way capable of offering unlimited. A common youtubing HD content can easily outdo 75GB,I am fine with a higher capping if the DL speed is what it is like our neighbor, if our neighbor can do it so are us. Why should we be any inferior than them?

This post has been edited by billytong: Mar 27 2010, 10:22 AM
wKkaY
post Mar 27 2010, 10:33 AM

misutā supākoru
Group Icon
VIP
6,008 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(billytong @ Mar 27 2010, 01:22 PM)
Well the fact is the price that TM charging us is way capable of offering unlimited.
*
On what grounds do you say this? Do you know something about TM's cost structure that we don't?
porty
post Mar 27 2010, 10:39 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
19 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
in future, when tm implement caps i wonder if its really going to be the internet utopia we are all hoping for

tm won be able to blame p2p users anymore...so i guess they will just have to say its the other servers fault, congestion along the links beyond their control, business users using all the bandwidth? LOL etc etc

so in the end, we pay more, download less, lets hope network performance is much better and not marginally...

if videos dont stream properly, and im not talking just about youtube but other video sites as well...i think i will be very disappointed.

today streamyx throttles youtube at certain times of the day, unifi with caps better not throttle youtube at all since they already have usage caps...






porty
post Mar 27 2010, 10:55 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
19 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
streamyx altho it says "unlimited"

tm does all kinds of stuff quietly to reduce the amount of bandwidth used eg throttling youtube at certain times and it affects everyone, whether you watch 1 video per day or 100 videos...

in future, with reasonable caps, hopefully tm ceases all these...
wKkaY
post Mar 27 2010, 11:10 AM

misutā supākoru
Group Icon
VIP
6,008 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(Eralus @ Mar 27 2010, 01:41 PM)
with the profit gain up to 600 million a year...u think TM not capable to give us unlimited cap???
*
What does TM's past profits have to do with billytong's claim that "Unifi's price is way capable of offering unlimited" ?
sg999
post Mar 27 2010, 11:13 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,027 posts

Joined: May 2008
QUOTE(Wan @ Mar 27 2010, 01:59 AM)
Maybe some of the users misunderstand the xgb/day thing, but some of us understand it well enough that it's not a daily cap tha we can only use 2gb per day. It's just a way to make a point against their monthly cap.

Yes, bandwidth cap is a must since bandwidth ain't free. But their cap ain't reasonable at all for a lot of us. Some people may not use that much bandwidth, but there are others who would. They should offer different type of packages of the same package to cater all the groups and not just satisfy the 'browsing only' people.

Please understand that bandwidth ain't free. And if you want unlimited, go get a dedicated line. There are reasons why they cost so much for those type of lines. Maybe in some other country it's cheap, but it's obvious from the beginning that it's not in Malaysia for whatever reasons. TM just need to make the cap bigger.


Added on March 27, 2010, 1:05 amCrap. Just read the previous page.. daily cap? Now that's shit!
*
noneed dedicated line
4M can did it already
no need this fakap UNIfi
throw to rubbish bin if no change for the 60gb cap wink.gif


Added on March 27, 2010, 11:15 am
QUOTE(milky @ Mar 27 2010, 02:15 AM)
@wan
soon streamyx will get affected one.....say goodbye to open 24/7 computer & modem staying online....1st victim is UNIFI's Customer.. i think by year end Streamyx coming along...
*
if streamyx also kena cap
what i can said this is MUNDUR
better did ntg
stay 4m
noneed HSBB noneed Unifi
just streamyx 4M enough nod.gif
n how come TIME can do it unlimited this tmnet cant?
wana earn more and dun1 buy the BW!!! rclxm9.gif


Added on March 27, 2010, 11:16 am
QUOTE(ahpek26 @ Mar 27 2010, 02:23 AM)
Why are you paraphrasing him, are you a parrot?

I think everyone knows that when UNIfail started to put cap, streamyx will get a cap too because both from the same company.
*
beneifit from streamyx is UNLIMITED!
if cap
then we go use AMAX!
ppl wireless and unlimited leh
rclxm9.gif


Added on March 27, 2010, 11:16 am
QUOTE(Mokuton @ Mar 27 2010, 05:03 AM)
explain how they are going to do that?

we have a contract.. :\
*
.........subjected change from time to time............ mad.gif


Added on March 27, 2010, 11:17 am
QUOTE(billytong @ Mar 27 2010, 10:43 AM)
I dont like the idea of capping, if they cannot afford to deliver the bandwidth, they should stop offering higher download speed. In fact we are paying at least 10-30 times higher than international Major Telcos. I still cant see how they cant offer unlimited with the small broadband speed they offer here while charging the rates where we should be getting 50-100mbps.
*
i agreed with you
no enough port add port la
no enough bw go buy la
not minus it form customer!
ridiculous!


Added on March 27, 2010, 11:18 am
QUOTE(prasys @ Mar 27 2010, 10:46 AM)
You guys are expecting for 1TB of cap. Common even some website packages do offer  20GB of bandwidth quota. But then if you're a heavy downloader you're screwed. For me and to be honest , I rather have the cap which is rather reasonable , umm say 75GB for 5Mbps

I dont want to suffer with slow connection just like streamyx because of certain group of self-centered folks who think that they are the only ones that are paying taxes and downloading things 24/7 !
*
please la
streamyx's slow connection not because of unlimited bw!
if because of the setting for the old copper line
think b4 u talk!


This post has been edited by sg999: Mar 27 2010, 11:18 AM
ahtung79
post Mar 27 2010, 11:25 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
76 posts

Joined: Oct 2004
From: Kuala Lumpur


only cap + pricing issue. where i think tm & their product marketing group can come up with more interesting packages for us...

i really believe tm can give cheaper pricing plan (even less than rm100) for 5mbps IF they can take out iptv, ipphone/homephone ANNNNNDDDD lower cap, let say 20-40GB. they are people that will use this package e.g. my parents/grandparents.

then they can charge value added price for iptv and phone.

for those that really need download more, maybe tm can charge for the bulk of data downloads. e.g. RM10-RM20 for every 5GB downloads.

i think with more packages, tm can penetrate more and get customers to their unifi. IMHO the pricing plan that's less than RM100 is the only affordable one by most malaysian.

cheers.
herojack41
post Mar 27 2010, 11:29 AM

Master Of Trouble Maker
*******
Senior Member
5,697 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: A Place Where God And Master Of TroubleMaker Exist



QUOTE(Eralus @ Mar 27 2010, 10:41 AM)
with the profit gain up to 600 million a year...u think TM not capable to give us unlimited cap???
*
u think tm will giv u no cap?

streamyx are femes in blooksucker and its huge profit....why they wanna giv benefit as...giving u = TM rugi



46 Pages « < 29 30 31 32 33 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0181sec    0.23    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 2nd December 2025 - 02:43 PM