i paired with gigabyte 890GX mobo..so far the performance i din feel any differences with the my old 955 + 790GX...
This post has been edited by Legend86: Apr 27 2010, 10:21 PM
AMD Phenom II X6, amd already started the shipping
|
|
Apr 27 2010, 10:21 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,800 posts Joined: Feb 2009 From: KL / PJ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 27 2010, 11:14 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,800 posts Joined: Feb 2009 From: KL / PJ |
|
|
|
Apr 28 2010, 12:19 AM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,800 posts Joined: Feb 2009 From: KL / PJ |
|
|
|
Apr 28 2010, 10:38 AM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,800 posts Joined: Feb 2009 From: KL / PJ |
QUOTE(Hiruka @ Apr 28 2010, 11:34 AM) Nice result for this new fabrication chip.. Yea...X6 stock cooler...look nice with copper base n 5 pipes....The temp quite promissing even the temp quite high for current Intel chip.. That's the stock cooler? Wuhuuu didnt looks like cheapo stock one.. even intel chip hv higher temp with stock cooler... |
|
|
Apr 28 2010, 10:44 AM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,800 posts Joined: Feb 2009 From: KL / PJ |
QUOTE(Hiruka @ Apr 28 2010, 11:41 AM) Yea lol..Intel shud outcome this stock cooler with better build. Not just packed as bundling products to bigger the box.. hahaha...new AMD retail box damn small..even X6 retail box small like hell...but like this more ECO..kaka... This post has been edited by Legend86: Apr 28 2010, 10:44 AM |
|
|
Apr 28 2010, 02:50 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,800 posts Joined: Feb 2009 From: KL / PJ |
Noisy?i don thk so bro...where u get the several comments? SOS?
This post has been edited by Legend86: Apr 28 2010, 02:51 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 28 2010, 02:56 PM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,800 posts Joined: Feb 2009 From: KL / PJ |
|
|
|
Apr 28 2010, 04:39 PM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,800 posts Joined: Feb 2009 From: KL / PJ |
|
|
|
Apr 29 2010, 03:52 PM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,800 posts Joined: Feb 2009 From: KL / PJ |
QUOTE(Silverfire @ Apr 29 2010, 04:47 PM) Unless those benchmark programmes are not fully optimised for 6 multi-core applications, then these P2 X6 might perform better with later version of benchmark programmes. Then 6 cores can be fully utilised, though I highly doubt the current benchmark programmes cannot utilise a processor with 6 threads when they can on a processor with 8 threads. +1 Programmes run on threads, not cores. Thus, above statements like not utilising all 6 cores are literally false as P2 X6 only have 6 threads. most benchmarking program still cant fully optimize or support 6 cores proc like 1055T...some even show unknown proc... |
| Change to: | 0.0266sec
0.23
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 3rd December 2025 - 10:18 PM |